Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T12:07:23.922Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Forum Isolation: Social Opprobrium and the Origins of the International Law of Internal Conflict

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2018

Giovanni Mantilla
Get access

Abstract

Why have states created international laws to regulate internal armed conflicts? This article is the first to theorize the emergence and design of these international rules, focusing on Common Article 3 to the 1949 Geneva Conventions. Drawing on original multicountry archival research, I develop the mechanism of forum isolation to explain the origins of Common Article 3, demonstrating the importance of social opprobrium pressure to explain why Britain and France switched from staunch opposition to support and leadership in 1949. Specifically, forum isolation pressured these European empires to concede and to react strategically behind the scenes, saving face and safeguarding their security interests by deliberately inserting ambiguous language in the text of Common Article 3. This move later facilitated states' avoidance of this rule in many conflict cases.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Organization , Volume 72 , Issue 2 , Spring 2018 , pp. 317 - 349
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abi-Saab, Rosemary. 1986. Droit Humanitaire et Conflits Internes: Origines et Évolution de la Réglementation Internationale. Geneva: Editions A. Pedone.Google Scholar
Adler-Nissen, Rebecca. 2012. Diplomacy as Impression Management: Strategic Face-Work and Post-Colonial Embarassment. Note de Recherche, Project on Globalization and the National Security State, Centre for International Peace and Security Studies, Montreal.Google Scholar
Adler-Nissen, Rebecca. 2014. Stigma Management in International Relations: Transgressive Identities, Norms, and Order in International Society. International Organization 68 (1):143–76.Google Scholar
Adler-Nissen, Rebecca. 2015. Conclusion: Relationalism or Why Diplomats Find International Relations Theory Strange. In Diplomacy and the Making of World Politics, edited by Sending, Ole Jacob, Pouliot, Vincent, and Neumann, Iver B., 284–308. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Arimatsu, Louise, and Choudhury, Mohbuba. 2014. The Legal Classification of the Armed Conflicts in Syria, Yemen and Libya. London: Chatham House.Google Scholar
Best, Geoffrey. 1994. War and Law Since 1945. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bradley, Mark Philip. 2010. Decolonization, the Global South, and the Cold War, 1919–1962. In Westad and Leffler, 464–85.Google Scholar
Brunnée, Jutta, and Toope, Stephen J.. 2010. Legitimacy and Legality in International Law: An Interactional Account. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bugnion, François. 2003. The International Committee of the Red Cross and the Protection of War Victims. Oxford: Macmillan Education.Google Scholar
Cialdini, Robert B., and Goldstein, Noah J.. 2004. Social Influence: Compliance and Conformity. Annual Review of Psychology 55 (1974):591–621.Google Scholar
Clunan, Anne. 2009. The Social Construction of Russia's Resurgence: Aspirations, Identity and Security Interests. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Dafoe, Allan, Renshon, Jonathan, and Huth, Paul. 2014. Reputation and Status as Motives for War. Annual Review of Political Science 17 (1):371–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
David, Barbara, and Turner, John C.. 2001. Self-Categorization Principles Underlying Majority and Minority Influence. In Social Influence: Direct and Indirect Processes, edited by Forgas, Joseph P. and Williams, Kipling D., 293–314. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Deighton, Anne. 2010. Britain and the Cold War, 1945–1955. In Westad and Leffler, 112–32.Google Scholar
Deitelhoff, Nicole. 2009. The Discursive Process of Legalization: Charting Islands of Persuasion in the ICC Case. International Organization 63 (1):33–65.Google Scholar
Engerman, David C. 2010. Ideology and the Origins of the Cold War, 1917–1962. In Westad and Leffler, 20–43.Google Scholar
Erb, Hans-Peter, Bohner, Gerd, Rank, Susanne, and Einwiller, Sabine. 2002. Processing Minority and Majority Communications: The Role of Conflict with Prior Attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 28 (9):1172–82.Google Scholar
Erickson, Jennifer. 2015. Dangerous Trade: Arms Exports, Human Rights, and International Reputation. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Federal Political Department of Switzerland (FPD). 1963. Final Record of the Diplomatic Conference of Geneva of 1949, Volume II-B. Bern: Swiss Federal Political Department.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha. 2009. Legitimacy, Hypocrisy, and the Social Structure of Unipolarity: Why Being a Unipole Isn't All It's Cracked Up to Be. World Politics 61 (1):58–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnemore, Martha, and Jurkovich, Michelle. 2014. Getting a Seat at the Table: The Origins of Universal Participation and Modern Multilateral Conferences. Global Governance 20 (3):361–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnemore, Martha, and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. International Organization 52 (4):887–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forgas, Joseph P., and Williams, Kipling D., eds. 2001. Social Influence: Direct and Indirect Processes. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Friman, Richard H. 2015. Introduction: Unpacking the Mobilization of Shame. In The Politics of Leverage in International Relations: Name, Shame, and Sanction, 1–32. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Gaiduk, Ilya. 2013. Divided Together: The United States and the Soviet Union in the United Nations, 1945–1965. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Hawkins, Darren. 2004. Explaining Costly International Institutions: Persuasion and Enforceable Human Rights Norms. International Studies Quarterly 48 (4):779–804.Google Scholar
Heimann, Gadi. 2014. What Does It Take To Be a Great Power? The Story of France Joining the Big Five. Review of International Studies 41 (1):1–22.Google Scholar
Heiss, Mary Ann. 2015. Exposing “Red Colonialism”: US Propaganda at the United Nations, 1953–1963. Journal of Cold War Studies 17 (3):82–115.Google Scholar
Hendrix, Cullen, and Wong, Wendy. 2013. When Is the Pen Truly Mighty? Regime Type and the Efficacy of Naming and Shaming in Curbing Human Rights Abuses. British Journal of Political Science 43 (3):651–72.Google Scholar
Hill, Christopher. 2016. Powers of a Kind: The Anomalous Position of France and the United Kingdom in World Politics. International Affairs 92 (2):393–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hitchcock, William I. 2012. Human Rights and the Laws of War: The Geneva Conventions of 1949. In The Human Rights Revolution: An International History, edited by Iriye, Akira, Goedde, Petra, and Hitchcock, William I., 93–112. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC). 1946a. Conférence Préliminaire des Societés de la Croix-Rouge pour l’Étude des Conventions et des Divers Problèmes Ayant Trait à la Croix-Rouge: Procès-Verbaux, Vol. II. Geneva: International Committee of the Red Cross.Google Scholar
International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC). 1947a. Report on the Work of the Preliminary Conference of National Red Cross Societies for the Study of the Conventions and of Various Problems Relative to the Red Cross Geneva, July 26 – August 3, 1946. Geneva: ICRC.Google Scholar
International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC). 1947b. Conférence d'Experts Gouvernementaux pour l’étude des Conventions protégeant les victimes de la guerre, Genève, 14–16 avril 1947, Procès-Verbaux, Assemblées Plénières, Vol. I. Geneva: ICRC.Google Scholar
International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC). 1947c. Report on the Work of the Conference of Government Experts for the Study of the Conventions for the Protection of War Victims, Geneva, April 14–26, 1947. Geneva: ICRC.Google Scholar
International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC). 1948. Draft Revised or New Conventions for the Protection of War Victims. Geneva: ICRC.Google Scholar
International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC). 1949. XVII Conférence de la Croix-Rouge, Stockholm, Août 1948, Commission juridique, Sténogramme des séances. Geneva: ICRC.Google Scholar
Jackson, Robert H. 1993. The Weight of Ideas in Decolonization: Normative Change in International Relations. In Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions and Political Change, edited by Goldstein, Judith and Keohane, Robert O., 111–38. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Harold Karan. 1962. The United Nations and Colonialism: A Tentative Appraisal. International Organization 16 (1):37–56.Google Scholar
Jervis, Robert. 2010. Identity and the Cold War. In The Cambridge History of the Cold War, II, Crisis and Détente, edited by Leffler, Melvyn P. and Westad, Odd Arne, 22–43. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Johnston, Alastair Iain. 2008. Social States: China in International Institutions, 1980–2000. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kahler, Miles. 1992. Multilateralism with Small and Large Numbers. International Organization 46 (3):681–708.Google Scholar
Kay, David A. 1970. The New Nations in the United Nations, 1960–1967. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Keck, Margaret E., and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kelley, Judith G. 2017. Scorecard Diplomacy: The Power of Reputation to Influence States. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kelley, Judith G., and Pevehouse, Jon C.W.. 2015. An Opportunity Cost Theory of US Treaty Behavior. International Studies Quarterly 59 (3):531–43.Google Scholar
Kinsella, Helen M. 2011. The Image Before the Weapon: A Critical History of the Distinction Between Combatant and Civilian. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kolodziej, Edward A. 1974. French International Policy Under De Gaulle and Pompidou: The Politics of Grandeur. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Koremenos, Barbara. 2016. The Continent of International Law. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipscy, Phillip Y. 2015. Explaining Institutional Change: Policy Areas, Outside Options, and the Bretton Woods Institutions. American Journal of Political Science 59 (2):341–56.Google Scholar
Mansfield, Edward D., Milner, Helen V., and Pevehouse, Jon C.. 2007. Vetoing Co-operation: The Impact of Veto Players on Preferential Trading Arrangements. British Journal of Political Science 37 (3):403–32.Google Scholar
Mantilla, Giovanni. n.d. Under (Social) Pressure: The Historical Regulation of Internal Armed Conflicts through International Law. Draft book manuscript.Google Scholar
Martin, Guy. 1995. Continuity and Change in Franco-African Relations. The Journal of Modern African Studies 33 (1):1–20.Google Scholar
Martin, Robin, and Hewstone, Miles. 2001. Determinants and Consequences of Cognitive Processes in Majority and Minority Influence. In Social Influence: Direct and Indirect Processes, edited by Forgas, Joseph P. and Williams, Kipling D., 315–30. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Mazower, Mark. 2011. The End of Civilization and the Rise of Human Rights: The Mid-Twentieth-Century Disjuncture. In Human Rights in the Twentieth Century, edited by Hoffmann, Stefan-Ludwig, 29–44. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McCourt, David M. 2014. Britain and World Power Since 1945: Constructing a Nation's Role in International Politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Mitzen, Jennifer. 2005. Reading Habermas in Anarchy: Multilateral Diplomacy and Global Public Spheres. American Political Science Review 99 (3):401–17.Google Scholar
Moir, Lindsay. 2007. The Law of Internal Armed Conflict. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew. 2000. The Origins of Human Rights Regimes: Democratic Delegation in Postwar Europe. International Organization 54 (2):217–52.Google Scholar
Moreillon, Jacques. 1973. Le Comité International de la Croix-Rouge et la Protection des Détenus Politiques. Geneva: Institut Henry-Dunant, Editions L'Age d'Homme.Google Scholar
Morrow, James D. 2014. Order Within Anarchy: The Laws of War as an International Institution. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Odell, John S., and Sell, Susan K.. 2006. Reframing the Issue: The WTO Coalition on Intellectual Property and Public Health. In Negotiating Trade: Developing Countries in the WTO and NAFTA, edited by Odell, John S., 85–114. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Paul, TV, Larson, Deborah Welch, and Wohlforth, William C., eds. 2014. Status in World Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Price, Richard. 1998. Reversing the Gun Sights: Transnational Civil Society Targets Land Mines. International Organization 52 (3):613–44.Google Scholar
Renshon, Jonathan. 2016. Status Deficits and War. International Organization 70 (3):513–50.Google Scholar
Reus-Smit, Christian. 2013. Individual Rights and the Making of the International System. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rey-Schyrr, Catherine. 2007. De Yalta a Dien Bien Phu: Histoire du Comité International de la Croix-Rouge, 1945–1955. Geneve: Georg Editeur.Google Scholar
Ringmar, Erik. 2002. The Recognition Game: Soviet Russia Against the West. Cooperation and Conflict 37 (2):115–36.Google Scholar
Risse, Thomas, Ropp, Stephen C., and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1999. The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Risse, Thomas, Ropp, Stephen C., and Sikkink, Kathryn. 2013. The Persistent Power of Human Rights: From Commitment to Compliance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, Christopher N.J. 2014. The Contentious History of the International Bill of Human Rights. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scheff, Thomas J. 2000. Shame and the Social Bond: A Sociological Theory. Sociological Theory 18 (1):84–99.Google Scholar
Scheffer, David. 2013. All the Missing Souls: Personal History of the War Crimes Tribunals. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Schimmelfennig, Frank. 2001. The Community Trap: Liberal Norms, Rhetorical Action, and the Eastern Enlargement of the European Union. International Organization 55 (1):47–80.Google Scholar
Sending, Ole Jacob, Pouliot, Vincent, and Neumann, Iver B., eds. 2015. Diplomacy and the Making of World Politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shlaim, Avi. 1975. Britain's Quest for a World Role. International Relations 5 (1):838–56.Google Scholar
Simpson, AW. Brian. 2002. Britain and the Genocide Convention. British Yearbook of International Law 73 (1):5–64.Google Scholar
Simpson, AW. Brian. 2004. Human Rights and the End of Empire: Britain and the Genesis of the European Convention. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sivakumaran, Sandesh. 2012. The Law of Non-International Armed Conflict. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Steele, Brent J. 2008. Ontological Security in International Relations: Self-Identity and the IR State. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Steinberg, Richard H. 2002. In the Shadow of Law or Power? Consensus-Based Bargaining and Outcomes in the GATT/WTO. International Organization 56 (2):339–74.Google Scholar
Tarnopolsky, Christina H. 2010. Prudes, Perverts, and Tyrants: Plato's Gorgias and the Politics of Shame. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Towns, Ann E. 2012. Norms and Social Hierarchies: Understanding International Policy Diffusion “From Below.” International Organization 66 (2):179–209.Google Scholar
Weeks, Jessica L. 2008. Autocratic Audience Costs: Regime Type and Signaling Resolve. International Organization 62 (1):35–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welch Larson, Deborah, and Shevchenko, Alexei. 2015. Status Concerns and their Role in Cooperation and Conflict. Paper presented at the 2015 Annual Convention of the International Studies Association, New Orleans, LA. 18–21 February.Google Scholar
Westad, Odd Arne. 2010. The Cold War and the International History of the Twentieth Century. In Westad and Leffler, 1–19.Google Scholar
Westad, Odd Arne, and Leffler, Melvyn P., eds. 2010. The Cambridge History of the Cold War, Volume I: Origins. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Kipling D., Forgas, Joseph P., von Hippel, William, and Zadro, Lisa. 2005. The Social Outcast: An Overview. In The Social Outcast: Ostracism, Social Exclusion, Rejection, and Bullying, 1–18. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Wilmshurst, Elizabeth, and Breau, Susan, eds. 2007. Perspectives on the ICRC Study on Customary International Humanitarian Law. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zarakol, Ayşe. 2010. After Defeat: How the East Learned to Live with the West. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Mantilla supplementary material

Mantilla supplementary material 1

Download Mantilla supplementary material(File)
File 19 KB