Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-05T20:03:50.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

From Loss to Looting? Battlefield Costs and Rebel Incentives for Violence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 August 2014

Reed M. Wood
Get access

Abstract

Research into the causes of civilian abuse during civil conflict has increased significantly in recent years, yet the mechanisms responsible for changes in actors' tactics remain poorly understood. I investigate how the outcomes of discrete conflict interactions influence subsequent patterns of rebel violence against civilians. Two competing logics suggest opposite influences of material loss on violence. A stylized model of rebel-civilian bargaining illustrates how acute resource demands resulting from recent severe conflict losses may incentivize insurgent violence and predation. I also identify several factors that might condition this relationship. I evaluate hypotheses based on these expectations by first analyzing the behaviors of the Lord's Resistance Army using subnational conflict data and then analyzing a cross-sectional sample of post–Cold War African insurgencies. Results from both the micro- and macrolevel analyses suggest that rising battlefield costs incentivize attacks on civilians in the period immediately following the accrual of losses. However, group-level factors such as effective control over territory and the sources of rebel financing condition this relationship. The findings suggest potential benefits from examining the interaction of strategic conditions and more static organizational characteristics in explaining temporal and geographic variation in rebel violence.

Type
Research Notes
Information
International Organization , Volume 68 , Issue 4 , Fall 2014 , pp. 979 - 999
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Balcells, Laia. 2011. Continuation of Politics by Two Means: Direct and Indirect Violence in Civil War. Journal of Conflict Resolution 55 (3):397–422.Google Scholar
Baines, Erin, and Paddon, Emily. 2012. This Is How We Survived: Civilian Agency and Humanitarian Protection. Security Dialogue 43 (3):321–47.Google Scholar
Barter, Shane J. 2012. Unarmed Forces: Civilian Strategy in Violent Conflicts. Peace and Change 37 (4):544–70.Google Scholar
Beardsley, Kyle, and McQuinn, Brian. 2009. Rebel Groups as Predatory Organizations: The Political Effects of the 2004 Tsunami in Indonesia and Sri Lanka. Journal of Conflict Resolution 53 (4):624–45.Google Scholar
Beber, Bernd, and Blattman, Christopher. 2013. The Logic of Child Soldiering. International Organization 67 (1):65–104.Google Scholar
Brambor, Thomas, Clark, William R., and Golder, Matt. 2006. Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses. Political Analysis 14 (1):63–82.Google Scholar
Branch, Adam. 2005. Neither Peace nor Justice: Political Violence and the Peasantry in Northern Uganda, 1986–1998. African Studies Quarterly 8 (2):1–30.Google Scholar
Braumoeller, Bear F. 2004. Hypothesis Testing and Multiplicative Interaction Terms. International Organization 58 (4):807–20.Google Scholar
Butler, Christopher, and Gates, Scott. 2009. Asymmetry, Parity, and (Civil) War: Can International Relations Theories Help Us Understand Civil War? International Interactions 35 (3):330–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byman, Daniel L. 2008. Understanding Proto-Insurgencies. Journal of Strategic Studies 31 (2):165–200.Google Scholar
Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN). 2005a. Global Subnational Infant Mortality Rates Dataset. Palisades, NY: CIESIN, Columbia University. Available at <http://www.ciesin.columbia.edu/povmap/ds_global.html>. Accessed 17 January 2012..+Accessed+17+January+2012.>Google Scholar
Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN). 2005b. Gridded Population of the World Version 3. Palisades, NY: CIESIN, Columbia University. Available at <http://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/data/set/gpw-v3-population-count>. Accessed 17 January 2012..+Accessed+17+January+2012.>Google Scholar
Cunningham, David, Gleditsch, Kristian S., and Salehyan, Idean. 2009. It Takes Two: A Dyadic Approach to Civil War Duration and Outcome. Journal of Conflict Resolution 53 (4):570–97.Google Scholar
Eck, Kristine. 2012. In Data We Trust? A Comparison of UCDP, GED, and ACLED Conflict Events Datasets. Cooperation and Conflict 47 (1):121–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eck, Kristine, and Hultman, Lisa. 2007. One-Sided Violence Against Civilians in War. Journal of Peace Research 44 (2):233–46.Google Scholar
Global Administrative Areas. 2012. GADM Database of Global Administrative Areas, Version 2.0. Available at <www.gadm.org>. Accessed 20 March 2014..+Accessed+20+March+2014.>Google Scholar
Harbom, Lotta, Melander, Erik, and Wallensteen, Peter. 2008. Dyadic Dimensions of Armed Conflict. Journal of Peace Research 45 (5):697–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, Danny. 2004. The Civilian Target in Sierra Leone and Liberia: Political Power, Military Strategy, and Humanitarian Intervention. African Affairs 103 (411):211–26.Google Scholar
Hovil, Lucy, and Werker, Eric D., 2005. Portrait of a Failed Rebellion: An Account of Rational, Sub-Optimal Violence in Western Uganda. Rationality and Society 17 (1):5–34.Google Scholar
Hultman, Lisa. 2007. Battle Losses and Rebel Violence: Raising the Cost of Fighting. Terrorism and Political Violence 19 (2):205–22.Google Scholar
Hultman, Lisa. 2010. Keeping the Peace or Spurring Violence? Unintended Effects of Peace Operations on Violence Against Civilians. Civil Wars. 12 (1–2):29–46.Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch. 2010. Trail of Death: LRA Atrocities in Northeastern Congo. New York: Human Rights Watch. Available at <http://www.hrw.org/reports/2010/03/28/trail-death>. Accessed 17 January 2012..+Accessed+17+January+2012.>Google Scholar
Humphreys, Macartan, and Weinstein, Jeremy M.. 2006. Handling and Manhandling Civilians in Civil War. American Political Science Review 100 (3):429–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, Patrick. 2008. The Geography of Insurgent Organization and Its Consequences for Civil War: Evidence from Liberia and Sierra Leone. Security Studies 17 (1):107–37.Google Scholar
Kalyvas, Stathis N. 2006. The Logic of Violence in Civil War. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kalyvas, Stathis N. 2012. Micro-level Studies of Violence in Civil War: Refining and Extending the Control-Collaboration Model. Terrorism and Political Violence 24 (4):658–68.Google Scholar
Lockyer, Adam. 2010. The Dynamics of Warfare in Civil War. Civil Wars 12 (1–2):91–116.Google Scholar
Long, J. Scott, and Freese, Jeremy. 2006. Regression Models for Categorical Outcomes Using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.Google Scholar
Lyall, Jason. 2009. Does Indiscriminate Violence Incite Insurgent Attacks? Evidence from Chechnya. Journal of Conflict Resolution 53 (3):331–62.Google Scholar
Mampilly, Zachariah C. 2011. Rebel Rulers: Insurgent Governance and Civilian Life During War. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Metelits, Claire. 2009. The Logic of Change: Pushing the Boundaries of Insurgent Behavior Theory. Defense and Security Analysis. 25 (2):105–18.Google Scholar
Mkandawire, Thandika. 2002. The Terrible Toll of Post-Colonial “Rebel Movements” in Africa: Towards an Explanation of the Violence Against the Peasantry. Journal of Modern African Studies 40 (2):181–215.Google Scholar
Raleigh, Clionadh, Linke, Andrew, Hegre, Havard, and Karlsen, Joakim. 2010. Introducing ACLED: An Armed Conflict Location and Event Dataset. Journal of Peace Research 47 (6):651–60.Google Scholar
Refugee Law Project. 2004. Behind the Violence: Causes, Consequences and the Search for Solutions to the War in Northern Uganda. Working Paper No.11. Kampala, Uganda: RLP. Available at http://www.refugeelawproject.org/files/working_papers/RLP.WP11.pdf. Accessed 16 January 2013.Google Scholar
Rustad, Siri A., and Binningsbø, Helga M.. 2012. A Price Worth Fighting for? Natural Resources and Conflict Recurrence. Journal of Peace Research 49 (4):531–46.Google Scholar
Singer, J. David, Bremer, Stuart, and Stuckey, John. 1972. Capability Distribution, Uncertainty, and Major Power War, 1820–1965. In Peace, War, and Numbers, edited by Russett, Bruce, 19–48. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Press.Google Scholar
Staniland, Paul. 2012. Organizing Insurgency: Networks, Resources, and Rebellion in Southeast Asia. International Security 37 (1):142–77.Google Scholar
Sundberg, Ralph, and Melander, Erik. 2013. Introducing the UCDP Georeferenced Event Dataset. Journal of Peace Research 50 (4):523–32.Google Scholar
Taber, Robert. 2002. The War of the Flea: The Classic Study of Guerrilla Warfare. Washington, DC: Brassey's.Google Scholar
Weidmann, Nils B., Rød, Jan K., and Cederman, Lars-Erik. 2010. Representing Ethnic Groups in Space: A New Dataset. Journal of Peace Research 47 (4):491–99.Google Scholar
Weinstein, Jeremy M. 2007. Inside Rebellion: The Politics of Insurgent Violence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wickham-Crowley, Timothy P. 1987. The Rise (and Sometimes Fall) of Guerrilla Governments in Latin America. Sociological Forum 2 (3):473–99.Google Scholar
Wickham-Crowley, Timothy P. 1990. Terror and Guerrilla Warfare in Latin America, 1956–1970. Comparative Studies in Society and History 32 (2):201–37.Google Scholar
Wood, Elisabeth J. 2003. Insurgent Collective Action and Civil War in El Salvador. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wood, Reed M. 2010. Rebel Capability and Strategic Violence Against Civilians. Journal of Peace Research 47 (5):601–14.Google Scholar
Wood, Reed M., and Kathman, Jacob D.. 2013. Too Much of a Bad Thing: Civilian Victimization and Bargaining in Civil War, British Journal of Political Science, 1–22.Google Scholar
Wood, Reed M., Kathman, Jacob D., and Gent, Stephen E.. 2012. Armed Intervention and Civilian Victimization in Intrastate Conflicts, Journal of Peace Research 49 (5):647–60.Google Scholar