Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:57:12.788Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Getting Socialized to Build Bridges: Constructivism and Rationalism, Europe and the Nation-State

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 October 2005

Michael Zürn  and
Jeffrey T. Checkel
Michael Zürn
Affiliation:
Hertie School of Governance, Berlin, Germany, and the Science Center Berlin, zuern@hertie-school.org
Jeffrey T. Checkel
Affiliation:
University of Oslo, Norway, and the ARENA Centre for European Studies, jeffrey.checkel@stv.uio.no
Get access

Abstract

Building on the empirical findings of the preceding articles, we advance three arguments. First, while socialization research has typically been construed as constructivism's home turf, this volume's emphasis on mechanisms and scope conditions reveals that rational choice has much to contribute here as well. We develop this claim by undertaking a “double interpretation” of each essay, which allows us to advance more fine-grained arguments connecting the two social theories. Second, while there are good conceptual reasons for expecting a predominance of international socialization in Europe, the empirical cases instead suggest that its effects are often weak and secondary to dynamics at the national level. We make sense of this puzzle by reasoning more explicitly in longitudinal terms, by drawing on work on European identity, and by noting that students of European socialization—as well as integration—have much to gain by “bringing the domestic back in.” Finally, while our collaborators have demonstrated the empirical and theoretical benefits of combining a social ontology with a positivist epistemology, this comes at a cost, with normative perspectives neglected. This matters—and all the more so in a Europe marked by supranational constitution- and polity building. Socialization dynamics may well take us beyond the nation-state, but their legitimacy and governance implications bring us back—forcefully—to it.We are grateful to the project participants and contributors to this volume for valuable discussions on the themes addressed here. For detailed comments on earlier versions of this essay, we thank two anonymous reviewers, the IO editors, Peter Katzenstein, and Ron Mitchell.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Organization , Volume 59 , Issue 4 , October 2005 , pp. 1045 - 1079
Copyright
© 2005 The IO Foundation and Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adler, Emanuel, and Michael Barnett, eds. 1998. Security Communities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Barnett, Michael, and Martha Finnemore. 2004. Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
Beck, Ulrich. 1993. Die Erfindung des Politischen. Frankfurt, Germany: Suhrkamp.
Bunge, Mario. 1997. Mechanism and Explanation. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 27 (4):410–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrnes, Timothy, and Peter Katzenstein, eds. Forthcoming. Praying for Europe: Secular States and Transnational Religion in an Expanding EU. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carlsnaes, Walter. 1992. The Agency-Structure Problem in Foreign Policy Analysis. International Studies Quarterly 36 (3):245–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey T. 1999. Norms, Institutions and National Identity in Contemporary Europe. International Studies Quarterly 43 (1):83–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey T. 2001. Constructing European Institutions. In The Rules of Integration: Institutionalist Approaches to the Study of Europe, edited by Gerald Schneider and Mark Aspinwall, 19–39. Manchester, England: Manchester University Press.
Checkel, Jeffrey T. 2003. ‘Going Native’ in Europe? Theorizing Social Interaction in European Institutions. Comparative Political Studies 36 (1–2):209–31.Google Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey T. 2004. Social Constructivisms in Global and European Politics: A Review Essay. Review of International Studies 30 (2):229–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey T., and Andrew Moravcsik. 2001. A Constructivist Research Program in EU Studies? Forum Debate. European Union Politics 2 (2):219–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cortell, Andrew, and James Davis. 2000. Understanding the Domestic Impact of International Norms: A Research Agenda. International Studies Review 2 (1):65–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowles, Maria Green, James A. Caporaso, and Thomas Risse, eds. 2001. Transforming Europe: Europeanization and Domestic Change. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
Dahl, Robert A. 1994. A Democratic Dilemma: System Effectiveness versus Citizen Participation. Political Science Quarterly 109 (1):23–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durkheim, Emile. 1922. Éducation et sociologie. Paris: Alcan.
Elster, Jon. 1979. Ulysses and the Sirens: Studies in Rationality and Irrationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Elster, Jon. 1985. Sour Grapes: Studies in the Subversion of Rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Elster, Jon. 1992. Arguing and Bargaining in the Federal Convention and the Assemblée Constituante. In Rationality and Institutions: Essays in Honour of Knut Midgaard, edited by Raino Malnes and Arild Underdal, 13–50. Oslo, Norway: Universitetsforlaget.
Elster, Jon. 1998. A Plea for Mechanisms. In Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory, edited by Peter Hedström and Richard Swedberg, 45–73. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Eriksen, Erik Oddvar, and John Erik Fossum, eds. 2000. Democracy in the European Union: Integration through Deliberation? London: Routledge.
Fearon, James D., and Alexander Wendt. 2002. Rationalism versus Constructivism: A Skeptical View. In Handbook of International Relations, edited by Walter Carlsnaes, Beth Simmons, and Thomas Risse, 52–72. London: Sage Publications.
Festinger, Leon. 1957. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
Finnemore, Martha. 1996. National Interests in International Society. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
Finnemore, Martha, and Kathryn Sikkink. 1998. International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. International Organization 52 (4):887–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fossum, John Erik. 2003. The European Union: In Search of an Identity. European Journal of Political Theory 2 (3):319–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gourevitch, Peter. 2002. Domestic Politics and International Relations. In Handbook of International Relations, edited by Walter Carlsnaes, Thomas Risse, and Beth Simmons, 309–28. London: Sage Publications.
Haas, Ernst B. 1958. The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social and Economic Forces, 1950–57. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
Haas, Ernst B. 2001. Does Constructivism Subsume Neo-Functionalism? In The Social Construction of Europe, edited by Thomas Christiansen, Knud Erik Jorgensen, and Antje Wiener, 22–31. London: Sage Publications.
Held, David. 1995. Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Hemmer, Christopher, and Peter Katzenstein. 2002. Why Is There No NATO in Asia? Collective Identity, Regionalism and the Origins of Multilateralism. International Organization 56 (3):575–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heritier, Adrienne, Christoph Knill, and Susanne Mingers. 1996. Ringing the Changes in Europe: Regulatory Competition and Redefinition of the State. Britain, France, Germany. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Herrmann, Richard, and Marilynn Brewer. 2004. Identities and Institutions: Becoming European in the EU. In Transnational Identities: Becoming European in the EU, edited by Richard Herrmann, Thomas Risse, and Marilynn Brewer, 1–24. Boulder, Colo.: Rowman & Littlefield.
Herrmann, Richard, Thomas Risse, and Marilynn Brewer, eds. 2004. Transnational Identities: Becoming European in the EU. Boulder, Colo.: Rowman & Littlefield.
Hooghe, Liesbet, and Gary Marks. 2001. Multi-Level Governance and European Integration. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield.
Hooghe, Liesbet, and Gary Marks. 2004a. Does Identity or Economic Rationality Drive Public Opinion on European Integration? PS: Political Science & Politics 37 (3):415–20.Google Scholar
Hooghe, Liesbet, and Gary Marks. 2004b. The Neofunctionalists Were (Almost) Right: Politicization and European Integration. Paper presented at the ARENA Research Seminar, October, ARENA Centre for European Studies, Oslo.
Hopf, Ted. 2002. Social Construction of International Politics: Identities and Foreign Policies, Moscow, 1955 and 1999. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
Hovi, Jon. 2004. Causal Mechanisms and the Study of International Environmental Regimes. In Regime Consequences: Methodological Challenges and Research Strategies, edited by Arild Underdal and Oran Young, 71–86. Boston: Kluwer Academic.
Hurrelmann, Klaus. 2002. Einführung in die Sozialisationstheorie. 8th ed. Weinheim/Basel: Beltz.
Johnston, Alastair Iain. 2001. Treating International Institutions as Social Environments. International Studies Quarterly 45 (4):487–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Josephson, John R. 2000. Smart Inductive Generalizations are Abductions. In Abduction and Induction: Essays on Their Relation and Integration, edited by Peter A. Flach and Antonis Kakas, 31–44. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
Jupille, Joseph, and James A. Caporaso. 1999. Institutionalism and the European Union: Beyond International Relations and Comparative Politics. Annual Review of Political Science 2:429–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jupille, Joseph, James A. Caporaso, and Jeffrey T. Checkel. 2003. Integrating Institutions: Rationalism, Constructivism, and the Study of the European Union. Comparative Political Studies 36 (1/2):7–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahler, Miles. 2004. Defining Accountability Up: The Global Economic Multilaterals. Government and Opposition 39 (2):132–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter. 2003. Same War–Different Views: Germany, Japan and Counterterrorism. International Organization 57 (4):731–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter, Robert Keohane, and Stephen Krasner, eds. 1998. International Organization at Fifty: Exploration and Contestation in the Study of World Politics. International Organization 52 (4):645–1061.Google Scholar
Kelley, Judith. 2004. International Actors on the Domestic Scene: Membership Conditionality and Socialization by International Institutions. International Organization 58 (3):425–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Keohane, Robert O., and Joseph S. Nye. 2000. Introduction. In Governance in a Globalizing World, edited by Joseph S. Nye and John D. Donahue, 1–41. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
Kohler-Koch, Beate, ed. 2003. Linking EU and National Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kohler-Koch, Beate, and Rainer Eising, eds. 1999. The Transformation of Governance in the European Union. London: Routledge.
Kuhn, Thomas. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Laffan, Brigid. 1998. The European Union: A Distinctive Model of Internationalization. Journal of European Public Policy 5 (2):235–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laffan, Brigid. 2004. The European Union and Its Institutions as ‘Identity Builders.’ In Transnational Identities: Becoming European in the EU, edited by Richard Herrmann, Thomas Risse, and Marilynn Brewer, 75–96. Boulder, Colo.: Rowman & Littlefield.
Levy, Jack. 1994. Learning and Foreign Policy: Sweeping a Conceptual Minefield. A Review Essay. International Organization 48 (2):279–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Lisa, and Beth Simmons. 1998. Theories and Empirical Studies of International Institutions. International Organization 52 (4):729–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayntz, Renate. 2003. Mechanisms in the Analysis of Macro-Social Phenomena. MPIfG Working Paper 03/3. Cologne, Germany: Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
Milner, Helen. 1992. International Theories of Cooperation Among Nations: Strengths and Weaknesses. A Review Essay. World Politics 44 (3):466–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew. 1993. Integrating International and Domestic Theories of International Bargaining. In Double-edged Diplomacy: International Bargaining and Domestic Politics, edited by Peter B. Evans, Harold Jacobson, and Robert Putnam, 3–42. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Moravcsik, Andrew. 1998. The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
Moravcsik, Andrew. 2002. In Defense of the ‘Democratic Deficit’: Reassessing Legitimacy in the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies 40 (4):603–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueller, Harald. 2004. Arguing, Bargaining and All That: Communicative Action, Rationalist Theory and the Logic of Appropriateness in International Relations. European Journal of International Relations 10 (3):395–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueller, Harald, and Thomas Risse-Kappen. 1993. From the Outside In and From the Inside Out: International Relations, Domestic Politics and Foreign Policy. In The Limits of State Autonomy: Societal Groups and Foreign Policy Formulation, edited by David Skidmore and Valerie Hudson, 25–48. Boulder, Colo.: Westview.
Pierce, Charles S. 1878. Deduction, Induction, and Hypothesis. Popular Science Monthly 13 (8):470–82.Google Scholar
Risse, Thomas. 2000. ‘Let's Argue!’: Communicative Action in World Politics. International Organization 54 (1):1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risse, Thomas. 2004. European Institutions and Identity Change: What Have We Learned? In Transnational Identities: Becoming European in the EU, edited by Richard Herrmann, Thomas Risse, and Marilynn Brewer, 247–71. Boulder, Colo.: Rowman & Littlefield.
Risse, Thomas. 2005. Neo-Functionalism, European Identity, and the Puzzles of European Integration. Journal of European Public Policy 12 (2):291–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risse, Thomas, and Matthias Maier, eds. 2003. Europeanization, Collective Identities and Public Discourses—Draft Final Report submitted to the European Commission. Florence, Italy: European University Institute and Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies.
Risse-Kappen, Thomas, ed. 1995. Bringing Transnational Relations Back In: Non-State Actors, Domestic Structures and International Institutions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ross, Edward A. 1896. Social Control. American Journal of Sociology 1 (5):513–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saretzki, Thomas. 1996. Wie unterscheiden sich Argumentieren und Verhandeln? Definitionsprobleme, funktionale Bezüge und strukturelle Differenzen von zwei verschiedenen Kommunikationsmodi. In Verhandeln und Argumentieren. Dialog, Interessen und Macht in der Umweltpolitik, edited by Volker Prittwitz, 19–39. Opladen, Germany: Leske & Budrich.
Scharpf, Fritz W. 1997. Economic Integration, Democracy, and the Welfare State. Journal of European Public Policy 4 (1):18–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schelling, Thomas C. 1960. The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Schelling, Thomas C. 1978. Micromotives and Macrobehavior. New York: Norton.
Schimmelfennig, Frank. 2003. Internationale Sozialisation: Von einem “erschöpften” zu einem produktiven Forschungsprogramm? In Die Neuen Internationalen Beziehungen: Forschungsstand und Perspektiven in Deutschland, edited by Gunther Hellmann, Klaus-Dieter Wolf, and Michael Zürn, 401–28. Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos.
Schneider, Volker. 2003. Komplexität und Policy-Forschung: Über die Angemessenheit von Erklärungsstrategien. In Die Reformierbarkeit der Demokratie. Innovationen und Blockaden, edited by Renate Mayntz and Wolfgang Streeck, 291–317. Frankfurt/New York: Campus.
Stinchcombe, Arthur L. 1991. The Conditions of Fruitfulness of Theorizing About Mechanisms in Social Science. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 21 (3):367–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokke, Olav Schram, and Davor Vidas. 1996. Effectiveness and Legitimacy of International Regimes. In Governing the Antarctic: The Effectiveness and Legitimacy of the Antarctic Treaty System, edited by Olav Schram Stokke and Davor Vidas, 13–31. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Waltz, Kenneth N. 1979. Theory of International Politics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Weber, Steven. 1994. Origins of the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. International Organization 48 (1):1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wessels, Wolfgang. 1998. Comitology: Fusion in Action. Politico-Administrative Trends in the EU System. Journal of European Public Policy 5 (2):209–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiener, Antje, and Thomas Diez, eds. 2004. European Integration Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Young, Oran R., and Marc Levy. 1999. The Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes. In The Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes: Causal Connections and Behavioral Mechanisms, edited by Oran Young, 1–32. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Zangl, Bernhard, and Michael Zürn. 1996. Argumentatives Handeln bei internationalen Verhandlungen. Moderate Anmerkungen zur post-realistischen Debatte. Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 3 (2):341–66.Google Scholar
Zehfuss, Maja. 2002. Constructivism in International Relations: The Politics of Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zinnecker, Jürgen. 2000. Selbstsozialisation. Zeitschrift für Soziologie der Erziehung und Sozialisation 20 (3):272–90.Google Scholar
Zürn, Michael. 1992. Interessen und Institutionen in der internationalen Politik. Grundlegung und Anwendungen des situationsstrukturellen Ansatzes. Opladen, Germany: Leske & Budrich.
Zürn, Michael. 1997. Assessing State Preferences and Explaining Institutional Choice: The Case of Intra-German Trade. International Studies Quarterly 41 (2):295–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zürn, Michael. 1998. Regieren jenseits des Nationalstaates. Globalisierung und Denationalisierung als Chance. Frankfurt, Germany: Suhrkamp.
Zürn, Michael. 2000. Democratic Governance Beyond the Nation-State: The EU and Other International Institutions. European Journal of International Relations 6 (2):183–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zürn, Michael. 2002. From Interdependence to Globalization. In Handbook of International Relations, edited by Walter Carlsnaes, Beth Simmons, and Thomas Risse, 235–54. London: Sage Publications.
Zürn, Michael, and Juergen Neyer. 2005. Conclusions—The Conditions of Compliance. In Law and Governance in Postnational Europe: Compliance Beyond the Nation-State, edited by Michael Zürn and Christian Joerges, 183–217. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.