Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T02:48:35.441Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The politics of productivity: foundations of American international economic policy after World War II

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 May 2009

Charles S. Maier
Get access

Extract

The years immediately after World War II provided American policy makers with a unique opportunity to help shape the international economic order for a generation to come. United States objectives are usually described in terms of enlightened idealism or capitalist expansionism. But much of the way policy makers envisaged international economic reconstruction derived from the ambivalent way in which domestic economic conflict had been resolved before and during the New Deal. In the inconclusive struggle between business champions and the spokesmen for reform, Americans achieved consensus by celebrating a supposedly impartial efficiency and productivity and by condemning allegedly wasteful monopoly. Looking outward during and after World War II, United States representatives condemned Fascism as a form of monopoly power, then later sought to isolate Communist parties and labor unions as adversaries of their priorities of production. American blueprints for international monetary order, policy toward trade unions, and the intervention of occupation authorities in West Germany and Japan sought to transform political issues into problems of output, to adjourn class conflict for a consensus on growth. The American approach was successful because for almost two decades high rates of growth made the politics of productivity apparently pay off. Whether an alternative approach could have achieved more equality remains an important but separate inquiry.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Organization , Volume 31 , Issue 4 , Autumn 1977 , pp. 607 - 633
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 For critical analyses, Gardner, Lloyd C., Economic Aspects of New Deal Diplomacy (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1964)Google Scholar; Kolko, Gabriel, The Politics of War: The World and United States Foreign Policy, 1943–1945 (New York: Random House, 1968)Google Scholar; Williams, William Appleman, The Tragedy of American Diplomacy (New York: Dell Publishing Co., 1962)Google Scholar.

2 For Johnston and Nelson, see Gaddis, John Lewis, The United States and the Origins of the Cold War, 1941–1947 (New York: Columbia University Press, 1972), pp. 176–77, 185–89Google Scholar. Clayton cited in Thomas Paterson, Soviet-American Confrontation: Postwar Reconstruction and the Origins of the Cold War (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1973), p. 4Google Scholar.

3 The Memoirs of Cordell Hull, 2 vols. (New York: Macmillan Co., 1948), Vol. 1, p. 364Google Scholar.

4 To see the implications of Wilsonianism, see Levin, N. Gordon Jr., Woodrow Wilson and World Politics. America's Response to War and Revolution (New York: Oxford University Press, 1970)Google Scholar.

5 For the earlier analogue: Gallagher, John and Robinson, Ronald, “The Imperialism of Free Trade,” Economic History Review, 2nd series, 6 (1953): 1–15Google Scholar; objections in D.C.M. Platt, “The Imperialism of Free Trade: Some Reservations,” Economic History Review, 2nd series, 11 (1968): 296–306Google Scholar, and “Further Objections to an ‘Imperialism of Free Trade,’ 1830–1860,” Economic History Review, 2nd series, 26 (1973): 77–91Google Scholar.

6 Rowland, Benjamin M., “Preparing the American Ascendency: The Transfer of Economic Power from Britain to the United States,” in Balance of Power or Hegemony: The Interwar Monetary System, Rowland, Benjamin M., ed. A Lehrman Institute Book (New York: New York University Press, 1976), pp. 195–224Google Scholar, and, in the same volume, Cleveland, Harold van B., “The International Monetary System in the Interwar Period,” esp. pp. 54–56Google Scholar; Pumphrey, Lowell M., “The Exchange Equalization Account of Great Britain,” American Economic Review, 32 (12 1942): 803–16Google Scholar.

7 Gardner, Richard N., Sterling-Dollar Diplomacy: Anglo-American Cooperation in the Reconstruction of Multilateral Trade (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1956), offers the best account of this relationshipGoogle Scholar.

8 Rowland in Rowland, pp. 202–04, 213–15.

9 For Morgenthau's ideas, see Blum, John Morton, ed., From the Morgenthau Diaries, Vol. 3: Years of War 1941–1945 (Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1967), pp. 228–30, 324–26, 333ff;cf. Kolko, pp. 323–40Google Scholar.

10 Leuchtenburg, William E., Franklin D. Roosevelt and the New Deal, 1932–1940 (New York: Harper and Row, 1963), pp. 243 ff.Google Scholar; Huthmachei, J. Joseph, Senator Robert F. Wagner and the Rise of Urban Liberalism (New York: Atheneum, 1971)Google Scholar; Sherwood, Robert, Roosevelt and Hopkins (New York: Harper & Brothers, 1948), pp. 110–11Google Scholar.

11 Letter to Averell Harriman, July 7, 1941, in James Forrestal papers, Princeton University Library, Box 56. For a liberal, journalistic account of Washington wartime economic conflicts, see Catton, Bruce, The Warlords of Washington (New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1948)Google Scholar.

12 Koistinen, Paul A. C., “Mobilizing the World War II Economy: Labor and the Industrial-Military Alliance,” Pacific Historical Review, 42 (11 1973): 443–78, esp. 446–60. CfGoogle Scholar. Bernstein, Barton J., “America in War and Peace: The Test of Liberalism,” in Toward a New Past: Dissenting Essays in American History, Bernstein, Barton J., ed., (New York: Random House-Vintage, 1968)Google Scholar.

13 Blum, John Morton, ed., The Price of Vision: The Diary of Henry A. Wallace, 1942–1946 (Boston: Atlantic-Little Brown, 1973), p. 137Google Scholar. See also Markowitz, Norman D., The Rise and Fall of the People's Century: Henry A. Wallace and American Liberalism, 1941–1948 (New York: Free Press, 1973), pp. 47ffGoogle Scholar.; Schapsmeier, Frederick H. and Schapsmeier, Edward L., Prophet in Politics: Henry A. Wallace and the War Years, 1940–1945 (Ames, Iowa: The University of Iowa Press, 1970), pp. 55–71Google Scholar.

14 Bernstein in Bernstein for Congressional conservatism; Markowitz, pp. 57–65 on NRPB; Huthmacher, pp. 285–302; Bailey, Stephen Kemp, Congress Makes a Law: The Story behind the Employment Act of 1946 (New York: Columbia University Press, 1950)Google Scholar.

15 See Hawley, Ellis, “Herbert Hoover, the Commerce Secretariat and the Vision of an ‘Associative State,’ 1921–1928,” The Journal of American History, 61 (06 1974): 116–40Google Scholar; also Hawley's, own essay in Herbert Hoover and the Crisis of American Capitalism, Hawley, Ellis et al. (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Schenkman, 1973)Google Scholar; Karl, Barry D., “Presidential Planning and Social Science Research: Mr. Hoover's Experts,” Perspectives in American History, 3 (1969): 347–409Google Scholar; Maier, Charles S., “Between Taylorism and Technocracy: European Ideologies and the Vision of Industrial Productivity in the 1920's,” Journal of Contemporary History, 5 (04 1970): 27–61Google Scholar.

16 Schriftgeisser, Karl, Business Comes of Age: The Story of the Committee for Economic Development and its Impact upon the Economic Policies of the United States (New York: Harper and Row, 1960)Google Scholar; also Stein, Herbert, The Fiscal Revolution in America (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1969), Chapters 8–9Google Scholar; Lekachman, Robert, The Age of Keynes (New York: Random House, 1966)Google Scholar.

17 Secretary of Commerce files in W. Averell Harriman papers, Washington, National Press Club Luncheon, October 15,1946.

18 The Journals of David E. Lilienthal, Vol. 1: The TVA Years, 1939–1945 (New York: Harper & Row, 1964), p. 471Google Scholar, entry of April 14, 1942. On the conservation justification, see Himmelberg, Robert F. essay in Hawley et al. , pp. 63–82Google Scholar; for planning in the '30s: Hawley, Ellis W., The New Deal and the Problem of Monopoly (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1966), pp. 122–27, 130–46Google Scholar; Lorwin, Lewis L. and Hinrichs, A. Ford, National Economic and Social Planning (Washington: GPO, 1935)Google Scholar; Roos, Charles F., NPA Economic Planning (Bloomington, Indiana: Principia, 1937)Google Scholar; Merriam, Charles, “The National Resources Planning Board: A Chapter in American Planning Experience,” American Political Science Review, 38 (12 1944): 1075–88Google Scholar.

19 Robinson, Joan, The Economics of Imperfect Competition (London, 1933)Google Scholar; Chamberlain, Edward H., The Theory of Monopolistic Competition (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1938)Google Scholar.

20 US Congress, Senate, Industrial Prices and their Relative Inflexibility, by Gardiner Means, Sen. Doc. 13, 74th Congress, 1st. Sess. 1935; cf. Beile, Adolph and Gardiner, Means, The Modern Corporation and Private Property (New York: The Macmillan Co., 1937)Google Scholar; also Leven, Maurice, Moulton, Harold G., Warburton, Clark, America's Capacity to Consume (Washington: The Brookings Institution, 1934), pp. 126–28Google Scholar.

21 Lynch, David, The Concentration of Economic Power (New York: Columbia University Press, 1946), pp. 1–34Google Scholar; Hawley, , The New Deal and the Problem of Monopoly, pp. 404–19Google Scholar.

22 Temporary National Economic Committee, Hearings, Vol. 1, appendix, p. 105.

23 The Memoirs of Cordell Hull, 1, p. 364.

24 Lilienthal, p. 324, entry of May 22, 1941.

25 Blum, John Morton, ed., From the Morgenthau Diaries, Vol. 1: Years of Urgency, 1938–1941 (Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1965), p. 20Google Scholar.

26 Lynch describes the TNEC results; for antitrust see Hawley, , The New Deal and the Problem of Monopoly, pp. 420–25Google Scholar.

27 See three books byBrady, Robert, The Rationalization Movement in German Industry (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1933)Google Scholar; The Spirit and Structure of German Fascism (New York: The Viking Press, 1937)Google Scholar; Business as a System of Power (New York: Columbia University Press, 1943)Google Scholar; Neumann, Franz, Behemoth: The Structure and Practice of National Socialism (Toronto and New York: Columbia University Press, 1942)Google Scholar. Cf. Niethammer, Lutz, Entnazifientng in Bayern: Säuberung und Rehabilitierung unter amerikanischer Besatzung (Frankfurt am Main: S. Fischer Verlag, 1972), pp. 37 ffGoogle Scholar.

28 Cohen, Jerome B., Japan's Economy in War and Reconstruction (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1949), p. 427Google Scholar.

29 For the embittered reaction of one see Martin, James Stewart, All Honorable Men (Boston: Little, Brown, 1952)Google Scholar.

30 Council on Foreign Relations: Studies of American Interests in the War and the Peace, Memoranda of Discussion; Economic and Financial Series, E-A 36, October 27, 1942.

31 Gardner, Cf., Sterling-Dollar Diplomacy; Rowland in Rowland, pp. 213–22Google Scholar; Paterson, pp. 159–73; Harrod, Roy, The Life of John Maynard Keynes (New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1951), p. 547 (letter to Keynes, March 2,1943)Google Scholar.

32 Dupriez, Leon H., Monetary Reconstruction in Belgium (New York: The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and the King's Crown Press, 1947)Google Scholar, esp. Chapters 3–4; Grotius, Fritz, “Die europäischen Geldreformen nach dem 2. Weltkrieg,” Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, Vol. 63 (1949 II): 106–52, 276–325Google Scholar; Gurley, J.C., “Excess Liquidity and European Monetary Reforms,” The American Economic Review, 43 (03 1953): 76–100Google Scholar; Möller, Hans, “Die westdeutsche Währungsreform von 1948,” in Währung und Wirtschaft in Deutschland 1876–1975, Bundesbank, Deutsche, ed., (Frankfurt am Main: Fritz Knapp GmbH, 1976), pp. 433–83Google Scholar.

33 For criticism, Cecco, Marcello De, “Sulla politica di stabilizzazione del 1948,” Saggi di politico monetaria (Milan: Dott. A. Giuffrè Editore, 1968), pp. 109–41Google Scholar; Economic Cooperation Administration, Country Study (Italy) (Washington, 1950)Google Scholar; Foa, Bruno, Monetary Reconstruction in Italy (New York: The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and King's Crown Press, 1949)Google Scholar; favorable judgments in Hildebrand, George H., Growth and Structure in the Economy of Modern Italy (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1965)Google Scholar, Chapters 2 and 8. On France, see Parodi, Maurice, L 'èconomie et la socéé française de 1945 à 1970 (Paris: Armand Colin, 1971), pp. 66ffGoogle Scholar. For general coverage of postwar policies, Brown, A.J., The Great Inflation, 1939–1951 (London: Oxford University Press, 1955), pp. 227–48Google Scholar.

34 Diebold, William Jr., Trade and Payment in Western Europe (New York: Harper and Row, 1952), esp. pp. 64–69Google Scholar. I have also drawn upon an oral-history interview with Averell Harriman, Milton Katz et al.

35 On this issue, see Diebold, William Jr., The End of the ITO, Princeton University, Department of Economics and Social Institutions, Studies in International Finance (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1952)Google Scholar.

36 Paterson, pp. 94–98.

37 US Department of State, Foreign Relations of the United States, 1946, V, 440–43Google Scholar. (Minutes of the Twenty-Fourth Meeting of the National Advisory Council on International and Monetary Problems, Washington, May 6,1946.)

38 Council on Foreign Relations archives, Records of Groups, XII G.

39 US Department of State, Foreign Relations of the United States, 1947, III, 224–25Google Scholar.

40 Trends can be followed in Lefranc, Georges, Le mouvement syndical de la libèration aux èvènements de mai–juin 1968 (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1969), pp. 41–76Google Scholar; Levi, Fabio, Rugafiori, Paride, Vento, Salvatore, II triangolo industriale tra ricostruzione e lotta di classe 1945/48 (Turin: Feltrinelli, 1974)Google Scholar; Pepe, Adolfo, “La CGIL della ricostruzione alia scissione (1944–1948),” Storia Contemporanea, 5 (1974): 591–636Google Scholar; Rieber, Alfred J., Stalin and the French Communist Party, 1941–1947 (New York: Columbia University Press, 1962), Chapter 14Google Scholar.

41 Besides the above, see Ambassador Caffrey's report to the State Department in Foreign Relations of the United States, 1947, III, p. 703, and Ambassador Dunn (Rome) on May 28, 1947, in ibid., pp. 91 Iff.

42 Lefranc, pp. 51–76; Turone, Serigo, Storia del sindacato in Italia (1943–1969) (Bari: Laterza, 1973), pp. 177–89Google Scholar; Horowitz, Daniel L., The Italian Labor Movement (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1963), pp. 214 ffGoogle Scholar.

43 The New York Times, May 8, 1967, p. 1, for Braden revelations.

44 Foreign Relations of the United States, 1947, III, 690–91Google Scholar (Caffrey cable, February 19), and 747–48 (Dunn report, December 11, 1948), III.

45 Evolution of the CIO leadership can be followed in Foreign Relations of the United States, 1948, III, 847–48Google Scholar, 867 (reports of March 10 and 24).

46 Foreign Relations of the United States, 1948, III, p. 863 (03 28,1948)Google Scholar.

47 Ibid., p. 855 (March 17, 1948).

48 For Clay's opposition to British plans, and Washington discussions, seeForeign Relations of the United States, 1947, II, pp. 910–11, 924ffGoogle Scholar; also Smith, Jean Edward, ed., The Papers of Lucius D. Clay: Germany 1945–1949, 2 vols. (Bloomington, Ind.: The Indiana University Press, 1975), Vol. 1, pp. 341–43Google Scholar, 352–63, 411–13. For German political ramifications see, among others, Schwarz, Hans-Peter, Vom Reich zur Bundesrepublik. Deutschland im Widerstreit der aussenpolitischen Konzeptionen in den Jahren der Besatzungsherrschaft 1945–1949 (Neuwied and Berlin: Luchterhand, 1966), pp. 297–344, 551–64Google Scholar; also Schmidt, Eberhard, Die verhinderte Neuordnung 1945–1952 (Frankfurt am Main: Europäische Verlagsanstalt, 1970)Google Scholar.

49 Halliday, Jon, A Political History of Japanese Capitalism (New York: Pantheon Books, 1975), pp. 206–19Google Scholar, is useful from a Marxist perspective. See also Kishimoto, Eitaro, “Labour-Management Relations and the Trade Unions in Post-War Japan (1),” The Kyoto University Economic Review Vol. 38, No. 1 (04 1968): 1–35Google Scholar, which emphasizes the role played by “seniority wages” in encouraging enterprise unions at the expense of more class-oriented labor coalitions; also Ayusawa, Iwayo F., A History of Labor in Modern Japan (Honolulu: East-West Center Press, 1966), pp. 257–75, 281–301, 315–23Google Scholar; Taira, Koji, Economic Development and the Labor Market in Japan (New York: Columbia University Press, 1970), pp. 183–87Google Scholar.

50 Halliday, , A Political History of Japanese Capitalism, pp. 182–90Google Scholar; Gimbel, John, The American Occupation of Germany, 1945–1949 (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1968), pp. 147 ff., 163 ff., 174–85Google Scholar.

51 See, for example, Herman Abs's presentation to the Council on Foreign Relations, December 5,1949, Council on Foreign Relations Archives, Records of Meetings, Vol. 10.

52 Ellis, Howard, The Economics of Freedom (New York: Harper, 1952), pp. 129, 135Google Scholar.

53 Titmuss, Richard, ”The Irresponsible Society,” Essays on the Welfare State (Boston: Beacon Press, 1969)Google Scholar.

54 These continuities in Europe comprise a major theme of my own current research; for the Japanese case, see Taira, p. 188, drawing upon the Japanese work of Ryohei Magota.

55 For the issue of whether international monetary systems do or do not require “hegemonic” leadership see the essays in Rowland, ed., Balance of Power or Hegemony; also Krasner, Stephen D., “State Power and the Structure of International Trade,” World Politics Vol. 28, No. 3 (07 1976): 317–43Google Scholar. Insights into the regulatory capacity of the earlier system are derived from Bloomfield, Arthur, Short-Term Capital Movements under the Gold Standard, Princeton University, Department of Economics and Social Institutions, International Studies No. 16 (Princeton, N.J., 1952), esp. pp. 72ff.Google Scholar; Lindert, Peter, ”Key Currencies and Gold, 1900–1913,” Princeton Studies in International Finance, No. 24 (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1969)Google Scholar.