Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:00:08.012Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Strategic Theory of Regime Integration and Separation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 October 2012

Tana Johnson  and
Johannes Urpelainen
Tana Johnson
Affiliation:
Duke University, Durham, N.C. E-mail: tana.johnson@duke.edu
Johannes Urpelainen
Affiliation:
Columbia University, New York. E-mail: ju2178@columbia.edu.
Get access

Abstract

States frequently disagree on the importance of cooperation in different issue areas. Under these conditions, when do states prefer to integrate regimes instead of keeping them separated? We develop a strategic theory of regime integration and separation. The theory highlights the nature of spillovers between issues. Positive spillovers exist when cooperation in one issue area aids the pursuit of objectives in another issue area; negative spillovers exist when cooperation in one issue area impedes this pursuit in another issue area. Conventional wisdom suggests that both positive and negative spillovers foster greater integration. We argue that negative spillovers encourage integration while positive spillovers do not. States integrate not to exploit positive spillovers between issues but to mitigate negative spillovers. To test our theory, we examine the degree of integration or separation among environmental regimes.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Organization , Volume 66 , Issue 4 , October 2012 , pp. 645 - 677
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, Kenneth W., and Snidal, Duncan. 1998. Why States Act Through Formal International Organizations. Journal of Conflict Resolution 42 (1):3–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alter, Karen J., and Meunier, Sophie. 2009. The Politics of International Regime Complexity. Perspectives on Politics 7 (1):13–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Axelrod, Robert, and Keohane, Robert O.. 1985. Achieving Cooperation Under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions. World Politics 38 (1):226–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, Tim P., Pierce, David W., Hidalgo, Hugo G., Bonfils, Celine, Santer, Benjamin D., Das, Tapash, Bala, Govindasamy, Wood, Andrew W., Nozawa, Toru, Mirin, Arthur A., Cayan, Daniel R., and Dettinger, Michael D.. 2008. Human-Induced Changes in the Hydrology of the Western United States. Science 319 (5866):1080–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barrett, Scott. 1997. The Strategy of Trade Sanctions in International Environmental Agreements. Resource and Energy Economics 19 (4):345–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, Scott. 2003. Environment and Statecraft: The Strategy of Environmental Treaty-Making. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benedick, Richard Elliot. 1998. Ozone Diplomacy: New Directions in Safeguarding the Planet. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biermann, Frank, Pattberg, Philipp H., van Asselt, Harro, and Zelli, Fariborz. 2009. The Fragmentation of Global Governance Architectures: A Framework for Analysis. Global Environmental Politics 9 (4):14–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonan, Gordon B. 2008. Forests and Climate Change: Forcings, Feedbacks, and the Climate Benefits of Forests. Science 320 (5882):1444–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Busch, Marc L. 2007. Overlapping Institutions, Forum Shopping, and Dispute Settlement in International Trade. International Organization 61 (4):735–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canadell, Josep G., and Raupach, Michael R.. 2008. Managing Forests for Climate Change Mitigation. Science 320 (5882):1456–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chambers, W. Bradnee. 2008. Interlinkages and the Effectiveness of Multilateral Environmental Agreements. New York: United Nations University Press.Google Scholar
Chasek, Pamela S., Downie, David L., and Brown, Janet Welsh. 2006. Global Environmental Politics. 4th ed.Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Chasek, Pamela S., Downie, David L., and Brown, Janet Welsh. 2010. Global Environmental Politics. 5th ed.Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Chayes, Abram, and Chayes, Antonia Handler. 1995. The New Sovereignty: Compliance with International Regulatory Agreements. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clean Development Mechanism. 2012. About CDM. Available at ⟨http://cdm.unfccc.int/about/index.html⟩. Accessed 30 April 2012.Google Scholar
Convention to Combat Desertification. 1994. Text of the Convention Including All Annexes. Available at ⟨http://www.unccd.int/en/about-the-convention/Pages/Text-overview.aspx⟩. Accessed 30 April 2012.Google Scholar
Davenport, Deborah Saunders. 2006. Global Environmental Negotiations and U.S. Interests. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Christina L. 2009. Overlapping Institutions in Trade Policy. Perspectives on Politics 7 (1):25–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downs, George W., Rocke, David M., and Barsoom, Peter N.. 1996. Is the Good News About Compliance Good News About Cooperation? International Organization 50 (3):379–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drezner, Daniel W. 2000. Bargaining, Enforcement, and Multilateral Sanctions: When Is Cooperation Counterproductive? International Organization 54 (1):73–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drezner, Daniel W. 2009. The Power and Peril of International Regime Complexity. Perspectives on Politics 7 (1):65–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eliasch, Johan. 2008. Climate Change: Financing Global Forests. Review commissioned by the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom. Available at ⟨http://www.official-documents.gov.uk/document/other/9780108507632/9780108507632.pdf⟩. Accessed 30 April 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Environmental Audit Committee. 2008. Committee Calls for Moratorium on Biofuels. Available at ⟨http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-archive/environmental-audit-committee/eac-210108/⟩. Accessed 30 April 2012.Google Scholar
Esty, Daniel C. 1994. The Case for a Global Environmental Organization. In Managing the World Economy: Fifty Years After Bretton Woods, edited by Kenen, Peter B., 287–309. Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Forest Carbon Partnership Facility of the World Bank. 2008. About the FCPF. Available at ⟨http://www.forestcarbonpartnership.org/fcp/node/12⟩. Accessed 30 April 2012.Google Scholar
Gehring, Thomas, and Oberthür, Sebastian. 2009. The Causal Mechanisms of Interaction Between International Institutions. European Journal of International Relations 15 (1):125–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenpeace. 2007. How the Palm Oil Industry Is Cooking the Climate. 8 November 2007. Available at ⟨http://www.greenpeace.org/international/Global/international/planet-2/report/2007/11/cooking-the-climate-full.pdf⟩. Accessed 30 April 2012.Google Scholar
Gullison, Raymond E., Frumhoff, Peter C., Canadell, Josep G., Field, Christopher B., Nepstad, Daniel C., Hayhoe, Katharine, Avissar, Roni, Curran, Lisa M., Friedlingstein, Pierre, Jones, Chris D., and Nobre, Carlos. 2007. Tropical Forests and Climate Policy. Science 316 (5827):985–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gupta, Joyeeta, and Hisschemöller, Matthijs. 1997. Issue Linkage As a Global Strategy Toward Sustainable Development: A Comparative Case Study of Climate Change. International Environmental Affairs 9 (4): 289–308.Google Scholar
Haas, Ernst B. 1980. Why Collaborate? Issue-Linkage and International Regimes. World Politics 32 (3):357–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M. 2009. The Power Politics of Regime Complexity: Human Rights Trade Conditionality in Europe. Perspectives on Politics 7 (1):33–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helfer, Laurence R. 1999. Forum Shopping for Human Rights. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 148 (2):285–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, Matthew J. 2005. Ozone Depletion and Climate Change: Constructing a Global Response. Albany: State University of New York Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphreys, David. 1996. Forest Politics: The Evolution of International Cooperation. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Institute for Governance and Sustainable Development. 2009. Frequently Asked Questions About Regulating Hydrofluorocarbons Under the Montreal Protocol (Abbreviated Version). Available at ⟨http://www.igsd.org/documents/IGSDHFCFAQGenevaJuly2009abbreviatedversion.pdf⟩. Accessed 30 April 2012.Google Scholar
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 1990. First Assessment Report. Available at ⟨http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/publications_and_data_reports.shtml⟩. Accessed 30 April 2012.Google Scholar
International Fund for Agricultural Development. 2012. IFAD and Desertification. Available at ⟨http://www.ifad.org/english/desert/index.htm⟩. Accessed 30 April 2012.Google Scholar
Ivanova, Maria. 2010. UNEP in Global Environmental Governance: Design, Leadership, Location. Global Environmental Politics 10 (1):30–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jinnah, Sikina. 2010. Overlap Management in the World Trade Organization: Secretariat Influence on Trade-Environment Politics. Global Environmental Politics 10 (2):54–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Tana. Forthcoming. Institutional Design and Bureaucrats' Impact on Political Control. Journal of Politics.Google Scholar
Johnson, Tana, and Urpelainen, Johannes. Forthcoming. International Bureaucrats and the Formation of Intergovernmental Organizations: Institutional Design Discretion Sweetens the Pot. International Organization.Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, and Tversky, Amos. 1979. Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk. Econometrica 47 (2):263–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O., and Victor, David G.. 2011. The Regime Complex for Climate Change. Perspectives on Politics 9 (1):7–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koremenos, Barbara, Lipson, Charles, and Snidal, Duncan. 2001. The Rational Design of International Institutions. International Organization 55 (4):761–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. 1982. Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables. International Organization 36 (2):185–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lohmann, Susanne. 1997. Linkage Politics. Journal of Conflict Resolution 41 (1):38–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Lisa L. 1993. Credibility, Costs, and Institutions: Cooperation on Economic Sanctions. World Politics 45 (3):406–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGinnis, Michael D. 1986. Issue Linkage and the Evolution of International Cooperation. Journal of Conflict Resolution 30 (1):141–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molina, Mario J., and Rowland, F. Sherwood. 1974. Stratospheric Sink for Chlorofluoromethanes: Chlorine Atom-Catalysed Destruction of Ozone. Nature 249 (5460):810–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Najam, Adil. 2005. Developing Countries and Global Environmental Governance: From Contestation to Participation to Engagement. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 5 (3):303–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norman, Catherine S., DeCanio, Stephen J., and Fan, Lin. 2008. The Montreal Protocol at Twenty: Ongoing Opportunities for Integration with Climate Protection. Global Environmental Change 18 (2):330–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oberthür, Sebastian, and Gehring, Thomas. 2006. Institutional Interaction in Global Environmental Governance: The Case of the Cartagena Protocol and the World Trade Organization. Global Environmental Politics 6 (2):1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor. 2012. Nested Externalities and Polycentric Institutions: Must We Wait for Global Solutions to Climate Change Before Taking Actions at Other Scales? Economic Theory 49 (2):353–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Overpeck, Jonathan, and Udall, Bradley. 2010. Dry Times Ahead. Science 328 (5986):1642–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oye, Kenneth A. 1992. Economic Discrimination and Political Exchange: World Political Economy in the 1930s and 1980s. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ozone-Climate Campaign. 2012a. The Campaign. Available at ⟨http://www.ozone-climate.org/ozone-campaign/index.php⟩. Accessed 30 April 2012.Google Scholar
Ozone-Climate Campaign. 2012b. Welcome to the Ozone-Climate Campaign. Available at ⟨http://www.ozone-climate.org/⟩. Accessed 30 April 2012.Google Scholar
Pan, Yude, Birdsey, Richard A., Fang, Jingyun, Houghton, Richard, Kauppi, Pekka E., Kurz, Werner A., Phillips, Oliver L., Shvidenko, Anatoly, Lewis, Simon L., Canadell, Josep G., Ciais, Philippe, Jackson, Robert B., Pacala, Stephen W., McGuire, A. David, Piao, Shilong, Rautiainen, Aapo, Sitch, Stephen, and Hayes, Daniel. 2011. A Large and Persistent Carbon Sink in the World's Forests. Science 333 (6045):988–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raustiala, Kal, and Victor, David G.. 2004. The Regime Complex for Plant Genetic Resources. International Organization 58 (2):277–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosendal, G. Kristin. 1995. The Forest Issue in Post-UNCED International Negotiations: Conflicting Interests and Fora for Reconciliation. Biodiversity and Conservation 4 (1):91–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schröder, Heike. 2001. Negotiating the Kyoto Protocol: An Analysis of Negotiation Dynamics in International Relations. Münster, Germany: Lit Verlag.Google Scholar
Schulze, Ernst-Detlef, Mollicone, Danilo, Achard, Frédéric, Matteucci, Giorgio, Federici, Sandro, Eva, Hugh D., and Valentini, Riccardo. 2003. Making Deforestation Pay Under the Kyoto Protocol? Science 299 (5613):1669.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sebenius, James K. 1983. Negotiation Arithmetic: Adding and Subtracting Issues and Parties. International Organization 37 (2):281–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, H. Jesse. 2007. Backdrop for the Future. Science 316 (5823):343.Google Scholar
Sprinz, Detlef F. 2001. Comparing the Global Climate Regime with Other Global Environmental Accords. In International Relations and Global Climate Change, edited by Lutebacher, Urs and Sprinz, Detlef F., 247–78. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sprinz, Detlef, and Vaahtoranta, Tapani. 1994. The Interest-Based Explanation of International Environmental Policy. International Organization 48 (1):77–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, Arthur A. 1980. The Politics of Linkage. World Politics 33 (1):62–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, Randall W. 2011. Controlling Institutions: International Organizations and the Global Economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taib, Fauziah Mohd. 1997. Malaysia and UNCED: An Analysis of a Diplomatic Process: 1989–1992. London: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Tilmes, Simone, Müller, Rolf, and Salawitch, Ross. 2008. The Sensitivity of Polar Ozone Depletion to Proposed Geoengineering Schemes. Science 320 (5880):1201–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
United Nations Collaborative Program on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation. 2009. About the UN-REDD Program. Available at ⟨http://www.un-redd.org/AboutUNREDDProgramme/tabid/583/Default.aspx⟩. Accessed 30 April 2012.Google Scholar
United Nations Environment Program. 1987. The 1987 Montreal Protocol on Substances That Deplete the Ozone Layer. Available at ⟨http://ozone.unep.org/Ratification_status/montreal_protocol.shtml⟩. Accessed 30 April 2012.Google Scholar
United Nations Environment Program. 2010. New Report Highlights Two-Way Link between Ozone Layer and Climate Change. Available at ⟨http://ozone.unep.org/Publications/ozone-day2010-press-release-WMO-UNEP.pdf⟩. Accessed 30 April 2012.Google Scholar
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). 1997. Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Available at ⟨http://unfccc.int/essential_background/kyoto_protocol/items/1678.php⟩. Accessed 30 April 2012.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2003. Ozone: Good Up High, Bad Nearby. Available at ⟨http://www.epa.gov/oar/oaqps/gooduphigh/ozone.pdf⟩. Accessed 30 April 2012.Google Scholar
Westerling, Anthony L., Hidalgo, Hugo G., Cayan, Daniel R., and Swetnam, Thomas W.. 2006. Warming and Earlier Spring Increase Western U.S. Forest Wildfire Activity. Science 313 (5789):940–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wetlands International. 2010. Letter to the European Commission on the Implementation of the EU Biofuel Directive. March 4, 2010. Available at ⟨http://www.wetlands.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=IPScUuJ2K4E%3d&tabid=56⟩. Accessed 30 April 2012.Google Scholar
World Resources Institute. 1996. World Resources 1996–97: The Urban Environment. New York: Oxford University Press. Available at ⟨http://pdf.wri.org/worldresources1996-97_bw.pdf⟩. Accessed 30 April 2012.Google Scholar
Young, Oran R. 1999. Governance in World Affairs. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Oran R., and Zürn, Michael. 2006. The International Regimes Database: Designing and Using a Sophisticated Tool for Institutional Analysis. Global Environmental Politics 6 (3):121–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zartman, I. William, ed. 1994. International Multilateral Negotiation: Approaches to the Management of Complexity. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Tana Johnson and Johannes Urpelainen

Mathematical Appendix

Download Tana Johnson and Johannes Urpelainen(File)
File 146.9 KB