Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T01:25:17.493Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Different disasters, different needs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Diyanath Samarasinghe
Diyanath Samarasinghe*
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Kynsey Road, Colombo 8, Sri Lanka, email dsamara@vinet.lk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Different kinds of disaster create dissimilar conditions for survivors, and the specific realities associated with each must guide our helping responses. This in no way negates the importance of having general principles to follow in responding to major disasters (Sphere Project, 2004; van Ommeren et al, 2005).

Type
Thematic Papers — Natural Disasters and their Aftermath
Information
International Psychiatry , Volume 3 , Issue 3 , July 2006 , pp. 8 - 11
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits noncommercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal College of Psychiatrists 2006

References

Alexander, D. A. (2005) Early mental health intervention after disasters. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 11, 12–18.Google Scholar
Davidson, J. R. T. (2002) Surviving disaster: what comes after the trauma? British Journal of Psychiatry, 181, 366–368.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Vries, F. (1998) To make a drama out of trauma is fully justified. Lancet, 351, 1579–1580.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (2001) Psychological Support: Best Practices from Red Cross and Red Crescent Programmes. Geneva: International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies.Google Scholar
Pupavac, V. (2001) Therapeutic governance: the politics of psychosocial intervention and trauma risk management. Disasters, 25, 358–372.Google Scholar
Rose, S., Bisson, J. & Wessely, S. (2002) Psychological debriefing for preventing post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, issue 2. Oxford: Update Software.Google Scholar
Roxane, C. H., Holman, E., McIntosh, D., et al (2002) Nationwide longitudinal study of psychological responses to September 11. JAMA, 288, 1235–1244.Google Scholar
Simeon, D., Greenberg, B. A., Knutelska, M. P. H., et al (2003) Posttraumatic reactions associated with the World Trade Center disaster American Journal of Psychiatry, 160, 1702–1705.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sphere Project (2004) Sphere Handbook (revised edn). Geneva: Sphere Project. Available at http://www.sphereproject.org/handbook/index.htm. Last accessed 20 April 2006.Google Scholar
van Ommeren, M., Saxena, S. & Saraceno, B. (2005) Mental and social health during and after acute emergencies: emerging consensus? Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 83, 71–75.Google ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.