Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T04:38:27.086Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

What factors are associated with the presence of mental health legislation? A cross-national study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Ajit Shah
Affiliation:
Ethnicity and Mental Health, Institute for Philosophy, Diversity and Mental Health, Centre for Ethnicity and Health, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK, email ajit.shah@wlmht.nhs.uk
Chris Heginbotham
Affiliation:
Institute for Philosophy, Diversity and Mental Health, Centre for Ethnicity and Health, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The World Health Report 2001, dedicated to mental health, identified several important factors for improving mental health services (World Health Organization, 2001): the policy and legislative framework; community mental health services; provision of mental healthcare within primary care; human resources; public education; links with other sectors; and monitoring and research. Moreover, national mental health policies and national implementation programmes for these policies are vital for the improvement of mental health services (World Health Organization, 2004; Jacob et al, 2007).

Type
Original papers
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits noncommercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists 2008

References

Horton, R. (2007) Launching a new movement for mental health. Lancet, 370, 806.Google Scholar
Jacob, K. S., Sharan, P., Mirza, I., et al (2007) Global mental health 4. Mental health systems in countries: where are we now? Lancet, 370, 10611077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mental Health Act Commission (2006) Eleventh Biennial Report. Placed Amongst Strangers, paras 3.73–3.86. TSO (The Stationery Office).Google Scholar
Mental Health Act Commission (2008) Twelfth Biennial Report. Risk, Right and Recovery, ch. 8. TSO (The Stationery Office).Google Scholar
Patel, V., Araya, R., Chatterjee, S., et al (2007) Treatment and prevention of mental disorders in low and middle-income countries. Lancet, 370, 9911005.Google Scholar
Saraceno, B., van Ommeren, M., Batniji, R., et al (2007) Global mental health 5. Barriers to improvement of mental health services in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet, 370, 11641174.Google Scholar
Saxena, S., Thornicroft, G., Knapp, K., et al (2007) Global mental health 2. Resources for mental health: scarcity, inequity, and inefficiency. Lancet, 370, 878889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shah, A. K. (2007) The importance of socio-economic status of countries for mental disorders in old age: a development of an epidemiological transition model. International Psychogeriatrics, 19, 785787.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shah, A. K. & Bhat, R. (2008) Are elderly suicide rates improved by increased provision of mental health service resources? A cross-national study. International Psychogeriatrics, 17 March, 18.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (2001) World Health Report 2001 – Mental Health: New Understanding, New Hope. WHO.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (2004) Mental Health Policy, Plans and Programme. WHO.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.