Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T23:37:29.713Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The multiple dimensions of frailty: physical capacity, cognition, and quality of life

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 April 2012

Francis Langlois ,
Thien Tuong Minh Vu ,
Marie-Jeanne Kergoat ,
Kathleen Chassé ,
Gilles Dupuis  and
Louis Bherer
Francis Langlois*
Affiliation:
Université du Quebec à Montreal (UQAM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada Institut Universitaire de Geriatrie de Montreal (IUGM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Thien Tuong Minh Vu
Affiliation:
Institut Universitaire de Geriatrie de Montreal (IUGM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montreal
Marie-Jeanne Kergoat
Affiliation:
Institut Universitaire de Geriatrie de Montreal (IUGM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Kathleen Chassé
Affiliation:
Institut Universitaire de Geriatrie de Montreal (IUGM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Gilles Dupuis
Affiliation:
Université du Quebec à Montreal (UQAM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada Institut de Cardiologie de Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Louis Bherer
Affiliation:
Université du Quebec à Montreal (UQAM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada Institut Universitaire de Geriatrie de Montreal (IUGM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: Francis Langlois, CRIUGM, 4545 Queen Mary, Montreal, QC H3W 1W4, Canada. Phone: +1-514-340-2800 (4048); Fax: +1-514-340-3548. Email: jfkfrancis@yahoo.ca.
Get access

Abstract

Background: Frailty is a complex health state of increased vulnerability associated with adverse outcomes such as disability, falls, hospitalization, and death. Along with physical impairments, cognition and quality of life may be affected in frail older adults. Yet, evidence is still lacking. The aim of this study was to compare frail and non-frail older adults on physical, cognitive, and psychological dimensions.

Methods: Thirty-nine frail and 44 non-frail elders were compared on several measures of physical capacity, cognition, and quality of life. Frailty status was based on a geriatric examination and scored using the Modified Physical Performance Test.

Results: After controlling for demographic and medical characteristics, physical capacity measures (i.e. functional capacities, physical endurance, gait speed, and mobility) were significantly lower in frail participants. Frail participants showed reduced performances in specific cognitive measures of executive functions and processing speed. On the quality of life dimension, frail elders reported poor self-perceptions of physical capacity, cognition, affectivity, housekeeping efficacy, and physical health.

Conclusion: In addition to the reduced physical capacity, frailty might affect selective components of cognition and quality of life. These dimensions should be investigated in intervention programs designed for frail older adults.

Keywords

frailtyneuropsychologypsychological well-beingphysical fitness
Type
Research Article
Information
International Psychogeriatrics , Volume 24 , Issue 9 , September 2012 , pp. 1429 - 1436
Copyright
Copyright © International Psychogeriatric Association 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bergman, H. et al. (2007). Frailty: an emerging research and clinical paradigm – issues and controversies. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Medical Science, 62, 731–737.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bohannon, R. W. (1997). Comfortable and maximum walking speed of adults aged 20–79 years: reference values and determinants. Age and Ageing, 26, 15–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bohnen, N., Jolles, J., and Twijnstra, A. (1992). Modification of the Stroop Color Word Test Improves Differentiation Between Patients with Mild Head Injury and Matched Controls. Lisse, Pays-Bas: Swets & Zeitlinger.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, M., Sinacore, D. R., Binder, E. F. and Kohrt, W. M. (2000). Physical and performance measures for the identification of mild to moderate frailty. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Medical Science, 55, M350–M355.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cesari, M. et al. (2006). Frailty syndrome and skeletal muscle: results from the Invecchiare in Chianti study. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 83, 1142–1148.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chang, C. I., Chan, D. C., Kuo, K. N., Hsiung, C. A. and Chen, C. Y. (2010). Vitamin D insufficiency and frailty syndrome in older adults living in a Northern Taiwan community. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 50 (Suppl 1), S17–S21.Google Scholar
Duquette, R. L., Dupuis, G. and Perrault, J. (1994). A new approach for quality of life assessment in cardiac patients: rationale and validation of the Quality of Life Systemic Inventory. Canadian Journal of Cardiology, 10, 106–112.Google ScholarPubMed
Edwards, J. D., Delahunt, P. B. and Mahncke, H. W. (2009). Cognitive speed of processing training delays driving cessation. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Medical Science, 64, 1262–1267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Enright, P. L. et al. (2003). The 6-min walk test: a quick measure of functional status in elderly adults. Chest, 123, 387–398.Google Scholar
Ferrucci, L., Windham, B. G. and Fried, L. P. (2005). Frailty in older persons. Genus, 61, 39–53.Google Scholar
Fillenbaum, G. G. and Smyer, M. A. (1981). The development, validity, and reliability of the OARS multidimensional functional assessment questionnaire. Journal of Gerontology, 36, 428–434.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Folstein, M., Folstein, S. E. and McHugh, P. R. (1975). “Mini-mental state”: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189–198.Google Scholar
Fried, L. P. et al. (2001). Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Medical Science, 56, M146–M156.Google Scholar
Fried, L. P., Ferrucci, L., Darer, J., Williamson, J. D. and Anderson, G. (2004). Untangling the concepts of disability, frailty, and comorbidity: implications for improved targeting and care. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Medical Science, 59, 255–263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hays, R. D., Hahn, H. and Marshall, G. (2002). Use of the SF-36 and other health-related quality of life measures to assess persons with disabilities. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 83, S4–S9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jokinen, H. et al. (2011). Incident lacunes influence cognitive decline: the LADIS study. Neurology, 76, 1872–1878.Google Scholar
Leng, S. X., Hung, W., Cappola, A. R., Yu, Q., Xue, Q. L. and Fried, L. P. (2009). White blood cell counts, insulin-like growth factor-1 levels, and frailty in community-dwelling older women. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Medical Science, 64, 499–502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Masel, M. C., Graham, J. E., Reistetter, T. A., Markides, K. S. and Ottenbacher, K. J. (2009). Frailty and health related quality of life in older Mexican Americans. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 7, 70.Google Scholar
Matusik, P. et al. (2011). Severe frailty and cognitive impairment are related to higher mortality in 12-month follow-up of nursing home residents. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics. Epublished ahead of print. doi:10.1016/j.archger.2011.06.034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyake, A., Emerson, M. J. and Friedman, N. P. (2000). Assessment of executive functions in clinical settings: problems and recommendations. Seminars in Speech and Language, 21, 169–183.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Podsiadlo, D. and Richardson, S. (1991). The timed “Up & Go”: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 39, 142–148.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reitan, R. M. (1958). Validity of the trail making test as an indicator of organic brain damage. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 8, 271–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rey, A. (1941). L'examen psychologique dans les cas d'encéphalopathie traumatique. Archives de Psychologie, 28, 21.Google Scholar
Rochat, S. et al. (2010). Frailty and use of health and community services by community-dwelling older men: the Concord Health and Ageing in Men Project. Age and Ageing, 39, 228–233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rockwood, K. et al. (2004). Prevalence, attributes, and outcomes of fitness and frailty in community-dwelling older adults: report from the Canadian study of health and aging. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Medical Science, 59, 1310–1317.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rockwood, K. et al. (2005). A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 173, 489–495.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Samper-Ternent, R., Al Snih, S., Raji, M. A., Markides, K. S. and Ottenbacher, K. J. (2008). Relationship between frailty and cognitive decline in older Mexican Americans. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 56, 1845–1852.Google Scholar
Serviddio, G. et al. (2009). Frailty syndrome is associated with altered circulating redox balance and increased markers of oxidative stress. International Journal of Immunopathology & Pharmacology, 22, 819–827.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walston, J. et al. (2006). Research agenda for frailty in older adults: toward a better understanding of physiology and etiology: summary from the American Geriatrics Society/National Institute on Aging Research conference on frailty in older adults. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 54, 991–1001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wechsler, D. (ed.) (1997). WAIS-III Administration and Scoring Manual. New York: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Yogev-Seligmann, G., Hausdorff, J. M. and Giladi, N. (2008). The role of executive function and attention in gait. Movement Disorders, 23, 329–342; quiz 472.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed