Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T03:08:35.013Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An investigation of the efficiency of the mini-Kingston standardized cognitive assessment-revised in classifying patients according to DSM-5 major and mild neurocognitive disorders due to possible Alzheimer's disease

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 January 2015

Jeremia Heinik  and
Gitit Kavé
Jeremia Heinik*
Affiliation:
Margoletz Psychogeriatric Center, Ichilov Hospital, Tel Aviv, Israel Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
Gitit Kavé
Affiliation:
Margoletz Psychogeriatric Center, Ichilov Hospital, Tel Aviv, Israel Department of Education and Psychology, The Open University, Ra'anana, Israel
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: Jeremia Heinik, Margoletz Psychogeriatric Center, Ichilov Hospital, 6 Weizmann Street, Tel Aviv, 6423906, Israel. Phone: +972-3-6973325; Fax: +972-3-6974658. Email: heinik@post.tau.ac.il.
Get access

Abstract

Background:

The aim of this study was to examine the efficiency of the mini-Kingston standardized cognitive assessment-revised (mini-KSCAr) in classifying patients according to DSM-5 major and mild neurocognitive disorders (NCD) due to possible Alzheimer's disease (AD).

Methods:

Files of 85 individuals who were tested on the Kingston standardized cognitive assessment-revised were reviewed and scores were calculated for the mini-KSCAr. Medical history, psychiatric and physical status, basic and instrumental activities of daily living, as well as scores on the Cambridge cognitive examination-revised (CAMCOG-R), and the clinical dementia rating (CDR) scale were used to establish DSM-5 diagnoses of major or mild neurocognitive disorders (NCD) due to possible AD or no cognitive decline. All participants were tested on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the clock drawing test (CDT), and a subset (N = 28) were also tested on three well-known memory tasks.

Results:

Scores on the MMSE, CDT, and mini-KSCAr differed across groups, but only the mini-KSCAr significantly distinguished each group from the other two. The mini-KSCAr showed better sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios (LRs) than did the MMSE and the CDT. A regression analysis revealed that the mini-KSCAr accounted for almost half of the variance in memory performance, whereas the MMSE and the CDT contributed nothing to this prediction once the mini-KSCAr was used.

Conclusions:

The mini-KSCAr is an efficient instrument for the diagnosis of DSM-5 major and mild NCD due to possible AD in a specialized psychogeriatric setting, and its utility is greater than that of the MMSE and the CDT.

Keywords

dementiascreening testscognitive evaluationAlzheimer’s disease
Type
Research Article
Information
International Psychogeriatrics , Volume 27 , Issue 5 , May 2015 , pp. 785 - 791
Copyright
Copyright © International Psychogeriatric Association 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edn. American Psychiatric Association: Arlington, VA.Google Scholar
Appels, B. A. and Scherder, E. (2010). The diagnostic accuracy of dementia-screening instruments with an administration time of 10 to 45 minutes for use in secondary care: a systematic review. American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease & Other Dementias, 25, 301–316.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Custodio, N. et al. (2014). The Memory Alteration Test discriminates between cognitively healthy status, mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer`s disease. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra, 4, 314–321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E. and McHugh, P. R. (1975). Mini-Mental State: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganguli, M. (2013). Can the DSM-5 framework enhance the diagnosis of MCI? Neurology, 81, 2045–2050.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ganguli, M. et al. (2011). Classification of neurocognitive disorders in DSM-5: a work in progress. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 19, 205–210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heinik, J. and Shaikewitz, D. (2009). The Clock Drawing Test-Modified and Integrated Approach (CDT-MIA) as an instrument for detecting mild cognitive impairment in a specialized outpatient setting. Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology, 22, 171–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinik, J., Werner, P., Mendel, A., Raikher, B. and Bleich, A. (1999). The Cambridge Cognitive Examination (CAMCOG): validation of the Hebrew version in elderly demented patients. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 14, 1006–1013.3.0.CO;2-5>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heinik, J. et al. (2004). Clock Drawing Test-Modified and Integrated Approach (CDT-MIA): description and preliminary examination of its validity and reliability in dementia patients referred to a specialized psychogeriatric setting. Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology, 17, 73–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hogervorst, E., Combrinck, M., Lapurta, P., Rue, J., Swales, K. and Budge, M. (2002). The Hopkins verbal learning test and screening for dementia. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, 13, 13–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hopkins, R. W. and Kilik, L. A. (2013). The mini-Kingston standardized cognitive assessment. American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease & Other Dementias, 28, 239–244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hopkins, R. W., Kilik, L. A., Day, D. J., Rows, C. P. and Hamilton, P. F. (2004). The revised Kingston standardized cognitive assessment. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 19, 320–326.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hughes, C. P., Berg, L., Danziger, W. L., Coben, L. A. and Martin, R. L. (1982). A new clinical scale for the staging of dementia. British Journal of Psychiatry, 140, 566–572.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacova, C., Kertesz, A., Blair, M., Fisk, J. D. and Feldman, H. H. (2007). Neuropsychological testing and assessment for dementia. Alzheimer's & Dementia, 3, 299–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalbe, E. et al. (2004). DemTect: a new, sensitive screening test to support the diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment and early dementia. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 19, 136–143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liew, T. M., Feng, L., Gao, Q., Ng, T. P. and Yap, P. (in press). Diagnostic utility of the Montreal cognitive assessment in the fifth edition of diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: major and mild neurocognitive disorders. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association.Google Scholar
Lonie, J. A., Tierney, K. M. and Ebmeier, K. P. (2009). Screening for mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 24, 902–915.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lyness, S. A., Lee, A. Y., Zarow, C., Teng, E. L. and Chui, H. C. (2014). 10-minute delayed recall from the modified mini-nental state test predicts Alzheimer's disease pathology. Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, 39, 575–582.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mitchell, A. J. (2009). A meta-analysis of the accuracy of the mini-mental state examination in the detection of dementia and mild cognitive impairment. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 43, 411–431.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ritchie, K. (2008). Psychometry in older persons. In Jacoby, R., Oppenheimer, C., Dening, T. and Thomas, A. (eds.). Oxford Textbook of Old Age Psychiatry (pp. 119–128). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Roth, M., Huppert, F. A., Mountjoy, C. Q. and Tym, E. (1998). CAMDEX-R: The Cambridge Examination for Mental Disorders of the Elderly. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Solomon, P. R. et al. (1998). A 7 minute neurocognitive screening battery highly sensitive to Alzheimer's disease. Archives of Neurology, 55, 349–355.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stephan, B. C. M., Matthews, F. E., McKeith, I. G., Bond, J., Brayne, C. and Medical Research Council Cognitive Function and Aging Study. (2007). Early cognitive change in the general population: how do different definitions work? Journal of the American Geriatric Society, 55, 1534–1540.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vakil, E. and Blachstein, H. (1997). Rey AVLT: developmental norms for adults and the sensitivity of different memory measures to age. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 11, 356–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velayudhan, L. et al. (2014). Review of brief cognitive tests for patients with suspected dementia. International Psychogeriatrics, 26, 1247–1262.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wechsler, D. (1997). Manual for the Wechsler memory scale-3rd edn San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Wechsler, D. (1998). Manual for the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-III. London: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Werner, P., Heinik, J., Mendel, A., Raikher, B. and Bleich, A. (1999). Examining the reliability and validity of the Hebrew version of the Mini-Mental State Examination. Aging (Milano), 11, 329–334.Google ScholarPubMed
Williams, J. G., Huppert, F. A., Matthews, F. E., Nickson, J. and MRC Cognitive Function and Ageing Study (MRC-CFAS). (2003). Performance and normative values of a concise neuropsychological test (CAMCOG) in an elderly population sample. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 18, 631–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, Q., Lv, Y., Zhou, Y., Hong, Z. and Guo, Q. (2012). Short-term delayed recall of auditory verbal learning test is equivalent to long-term delayed recall for identifying amnestic mild cognitive impairment. PLoS ONE, 7, e51157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed