Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:57:57.236Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Clinical Validity and Utility of the Interview for Deterioration of Daily Living in Dementia for Spanish-Speaking Communities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2005

Peter Böhm
Affiliation:
Section of Neuropsychology, Hospital del Mar, Institut Municipal d'Assistencia Sanitaria (IMAS), Barcelona, Spain
Jordi Peña-Casanova
Affiliation:
Section of Neuropsychology, Hospital del Mar, Institut Municipal d'Assistencia Sanitaria (IMAS), Barcelona, Spain
Miquel Aguilar
Affiliation:
Service of Neurology, Hospital Mútua de Terrassa, Terrassa, Spain
Gonzalo Hernández
Affiliation:
Research and Development Department, Parke-Davis, SA, Barcelona, Spain
Josep M. Sol
Affiliation:
Research and Development Department, Parke-Davis, SA, Barcelona, Spain
Rafael Blesa
Affiliation:
Service of Neurology, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
Get access

Abstract

The assessment of activities of daily living is a central procedure in the diagnosis of dementia. Few instruments in the field allow for early detection of functional decline because the items they use refer mainly to basic activities of daily living (BADL), which do not become compromised until later in the disease process. The Interview for Deterioration of Daily Living in Dementia (IDDD) may be a valuable tool for early detection of functional decline because it includes, apart from a BADL subscale, another subscale containing a variety of instrumental activities of daily living (IADL), which are the first to be affected in dementing processes. We present an adaptation and validation of the IDDD for Spanish-speaking communities (S-IDDD). A total of 254 control subjects (CONT), 86 patients with mild memory/cognitive impairment with no dementia (CIND), and 111 patients diagnosed with probable dementia of the Alzheimer type (DAT) participated in this project. IDDD total scores (mean and SD) were as follow: CONT: 33.1 (0.4); CIND: 35.2 (3.4); DAT: 54.3 (18.6). The present validation showed no sociodemographic effects on the IDDD total scores. The IDDD demonstrated great internal consistency (α = .985) and reproducibility (intraclass correlation coefficient = .94). Correlations were high (r = .81; p < .1) when they took into account the whole sample, but decreased significantly when the groups were separated by pathologic condition. The scale showed significant differences between DAT versus CIND and CONT. The IADL subscale differentiated all three groups, which makes it extremely valuable for early detection of functional decline. The present study shows that the S-IDDD is a reliable adaptation of the of the original IDDD scale and may be used successfully in Spanish populations for staging and follow-up of subjects with dementia.

Type
Aspects of Dementia
Copyright
© 1998 International Psychogeriatric Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)