Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:37:25.312Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Development of the Chinese Version of the Geriatric Mental State Schedule

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2005

Hin-Yeung Tsang
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chai Yi, Taiwan
Main-Yoon Chong
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
Andrew T. A. Cheng
Affiliation:
Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan
Get access

Abstract

Objective: To test the validity and reliability of the Chinese Geriatric Mental State Schedule (CGMS) in Taiwanese elders. Methods: The CGMS has gone through a standardized two-way translation, a pretest phase, and consensus focus group meetings in order to modify relevant culture-related terms of the original English version. The interrater reliability of the CGMS among eight psychiatrists was conducted after a training course was given to them. Diagnoses generated by the CGMS-AGECAT (Automated Geriatric Examination for Computer Assisted Taxonomy) were compared with psychiatric diagnoses according to the DSM-III-R criteria. The sample subjects were aged 65 and over and recruited from a community (n = 36) and an “old age home” (n = 56). Results: Four of the eight diagnostic categories generated by the CGMS-AGECAT had a generalized kappa value of 1.0, and the figures for the remaining four categories were acceptable: .8 for depressive neurosis, .6 for anxiety disorder, .5 for schizophrenia, and .5 for depressive psychosis (generalized kappa = .5). The overall agreement between the CGMS-AGECAT and independent psychiatric diagnosis (based on the DSM-III-R criteria) was satisfactory. Conclusion: The CGMS has been found to be a crossculturally valid and reliable instrument for use in Taiwan.

Type
Articles
Copyright
© 2002 International Psychogeriatric Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)