Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T13:02:44.112Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Development of the strain in dementia care scale (SDCS)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 July 2015

Anna-Karin Edberg Open the ORCID record for Anna-Karin Edberg [Opens in a new window] ,
Katrina Anderson ,
Anneli Orrung Wallin  and
Mike Bird
Anna-Karin Edberg*
Affiliation:
Department of Health and Society, Kristianstad University, Kristianstad, Sweden
Katrina Anderson
Affiliation:
Aged Care Evaluation Unit, Southern NSW Local Health District, Canberra, New South Wales, Australia
Anneli Orrung Wallin
Affiliation:
Department of Health and Society, Kristianstad University, Kristianstad, Sweden
Mike Bird
Affiliation:
Dementia Development Services Centre, Bangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd, UK
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: Anna-Karin Edberg, Department of Health and Society, Kristianstad University, SE 291 88 Kristianstad, Sweden. Phone: +46-44-204075. Email: anna-karin.edberg@hkr.se.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background:

Though many staff gain satisfaction from working with people with dementia in residential facilities, they also experience significant stress. This is a serious issue because this in turn can affect the quality of care. There is, however, a lack of instruments to measure staff strain in the dementia-specific residential care environment, and the aim of this study, accordingly, was to develop the “Strain in Dementia Care Scale.”

Methods:

The instrument was developed in three steps. In the first step, items were derived from six focus group discussions with 35 nurses in the United Kingdom, Australia, and Sweden concerning their experience of strain. In the second step, a preliminary 64-item scale was distributed to 927 dementia care staff in Australia and Sweden, which, based on exploratory factor analysis, resulted in a 29-item scale. In the final step, the 29-item scale was distributed to a new sample of 346 staff in Sweden, and the results were subjected to confirmatory factor analysis.

Results:

The final scale comprised the following 27 items producing a five-factor solution: Frustrated empathy; difficulties understanding and interpreting; balancing competing needs; balancing emotional involvement; and lack of recognition.

Conclusions:

The scale can be used (a) as an outcome measurement in residential care intervention studies; (b) to help residential facilities identify interventions needed to improve staff well-being, and, by extension, those they care for; and (c) to generally make more salient the critical issue of staff strain and the importance of ameliorating it.

Keywords

work stresswork situationstaffaged carelong-term caredementia care
Type
Research Article
Information
International Psychogeriatrics , Volume 27 , Issue 12 , December 2015 , pp. 2017 - 2030
Copyright
Copyright © International Psychogeriatric Association 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beaton, E. D., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F. and Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. SPINE, 25, 3186–3191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beck, C., Ortigara, A., Mercer, S. and Shue, V. (1999). Enabling and empowering certified nursing assistants for quality dementia care. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 14, 197–212.Google Scholar
Berg, A., Hallberg, I. and Norberg, A. (1998). Nurses’ reflections about dementia care, the patients, the care and themselves in their daily caregiving. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 35, 271–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, M., Llewellyn-Jones, R. and Korten, A. (2009). An evaluation of a case-specific approach to challenging behaviour associated with dementia. Aging and Mental Health, 13, 73–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bird, M., Llewellyn-Jones, R., Korten, A. and Smithers, H. (2007). A controlled trial of a predominantly psychosocial approach to BPSD. International Psychogeriatrics, 19, 874–891.Google Scholar
Brodaty, H., Draper, B. and Low, L. F. (2003). Nursing home staff attitudes towards residents with dementia: strain and satisfaction with work. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 44, 583–590.Google Scholar
Castle, N. G., Degenholtz, H. and Rosen, J. (2006). Determinants of staff job satisfaction of caregivers in two nursing homes in Pennsylvania. BMC Health Services Research, 6, 60.Google Scholar
Duffy, B., Oyebode, J. and Allen, J. (2009). Burnout among care staff for older people with dementia: the role of reciprocity, self-efficacy and organizational factors. Dementia, 8, 515–541.Google Scholar
Edberg, A.-K., Bird, M., Richards, D., Woods, B., Keeley, P. and Davis-Quarrell, V. (2008). Strain in nursing care of people with dementia: nurses’ experience in Australia, Sweden and United Kingdom. Aging and Mental Health, 12, 236–243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edberg, A.-K., Hallberg, I. R. and Gustafson, L. (1996). Effects of clinical supervision on nurse-patient cooperation quality – a controlled study in dementia care. Clinical Nursing Research, 5, 127–149.Google Scholar
Edberg, A.-K., Moyle, W. and Chan, S. (2012). The IPA Complete Guides to Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia, BPSD; Nurses Guide. Chicago, IL: International Psychogeriatric Association (IPA). ISBN 978-0-9815613-2-5.Google Scholar
Edvardsson, D., Sandman, P. O., Nay, R. and Karlsson, S. (2008). Associations between the working characteristics of nursing staff and the prevalence of behavioral symptoms in people with dementia in residential care. International Psychogeriatrics, 20, 764–776.Google Scholar
Edvardsson, D., Sandman, P. O., Nay, R. and Karlsson, S. (2009). Predictors of job strain in residential dementia care nursing staff. Journal of Nursing Management, 17, 59–65.Google Scholar
Eggenberger, E., Heimer, K. and Bennett, M. (2013). Communication skills training in dementia care: a systematic review of effectiveness, training content, and didactic methods in different care settings. International Psychogeriatrics, 25, 345–358.Google Scholar
Glasberg, A. L. et al. (2006). Development and initial validation of the stress of concience questionnaire. Nursing Ethics, 13, 633–648.Google Scholar
Graneheim, U. and Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24, 105–112.Google Scholar
Hallberg, I. R. and Norberg, A. (1993). Strain among nurses and their emotional reactions during 1 year of systematic clinical supervision combined with the implementation of individualized care in dementia nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 18, 1860–1875.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knapp, T. (1988). Stress versus strain: a methodological critique. Nursing Research, 37, 181–184.Google Scholar
McVicar, A. (2003). Workplace stress in nursing: a literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 44, 633–642.Google Scholar
Moniz-Cook, E., Woods, R. and Gardiner, E. (2000). Staff factors associated with perception of behaviour as “challenging” in residential and nursing homes. Aging and Mental Health, 4, 48–55.Google Scholar
Morgan, D., Stewart, N., D’Arcy, C., Forbes, D. and Lawson, J. (2005). Work stress and physical assault of nursing aides in rural nursing homes with and without dementia special care units. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 12, 347–358.Google Scholar
Orrung Wallin, A., Edberg, A.-K., Beck, I. and Jakobsson, U. (2013). Psychometric properties concerning four instruments measuring job satisfaction, strain and stress of conscience in a residential care context. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 57, 162–171.Google Scholar
Orrung Wallin, A., Jakobsson, U. and Edberg, A.-K. (2012). Job-satisfaction and associated variables among nurse assistants working in residential care. International Psychogeriatrics, 24, 1904–1918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orrung Wallin, A., Jakobsson, U. and Edberg, A.-K. (2015). Job strain and stress of conscience among nurse assistants working in residential care. Journal of Nursing Management, 23, 368–379.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rattary, J. and Jones, M.C. (2007). Essential elements of questionnaire design and development. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 16, 234–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rickerson, E., Somers, C., Allen, C., Lewis, B. and Casarett, D. (2005). How well are we caring for caregivers? Prevalence of grief-related symptoms and need for bereavement support among long-term care staff. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 30, 227–233.Google Scholar
Saunders, J. A., Morrow-Howell, N., Spitznagel, E., Dori, P., Proctor, E. K. and Pescarino, R. (2006). Imputing missing data: a comparison of methods for social work researchers. Social Work Research, 30, 19–31.Google Scholar
Schmidt, S. G., Dichter, M. N., Palm, R. and Hasselhorn, H. M. (2012). Distress experienced by nurses in response to the challenging behaviour of residents – evidence from German nursing homes. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 21, 3134–3142.Google Scholar
Streiner, D. L. and Norman, G. R. (2008). Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to their Development and Use. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tanaka, J. (1993). Multi-faceted conceptions of fit in structural equation models. In Bollen, K. A. and Long, J. S. (eds.), Testing Structural Equation Models (pp. 10–39). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Vasse, E., Vernooij-Dasses, M., Spijker, A., Rikkert, M. and Koopmans, R. (2010). A systematic review of communication strategies for people with dementia in residential and nursing homes. International Psychogeriatrics, 22, 189–200.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Edberg supplementary material

Edberg supplementary material 1

Download Edberg supplementary material(File)
File 21.3 KB