Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T09:48:55.293Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How is personality related to well-being in older and younger adults? The role of psychological flexibility

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 December 2018

Priska Steenhaut ,
Gina Rossi ,
Ineke Demeyer  and
Rudi De Raedt
Priska Steenhaut*
Affiliation:
Clinical and Lifespan Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
Gina Rossi
Affiliation:
Clinical and Lifespan Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
Ineke Demeyer
Affiliation:
Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
Rudi De Raedt
Affiliation:
Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: Priska Steenhaut, Clinical and Lifespan Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Pleinlaan 2, B-1050 Elsene, Belgium. Phone: +32 486 94 01 92. Email: Priska.Steenhaut@vub.be.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives:

Personality is known to be a reliable predictor of well-being. However, it is rather difficult to influence the personality of individuals in order to improve their well-being. Therefore, it is important to examine possible underlying mechanisms or indirect effects. Consequently, the aim of the current study was to investigate whether psychological flexibility is a mechanism explaining the relationship between personality and well-being. Given the evidence that age-related differences exist in personality, flexibility, and well-being, we also investigated whether our indirect effects model differed in both older and younger adults.

Design:

We used a cross-sectional design.

Setting:

Participants were asked to fill in questionnaires at home.

Participants:

We recruited 138 younger (25–50 years) and 120 older (65+) adults from a community-dwelling population.

Measurements:

Self-report questionnaires were used to assess (mal)adaptive personality traits (Big Five), psychological flexibility, and affective and general subjective well-being.

Results:

Similar indirect effects were found in older and younger adults: Psychological flexibility is a mechanism explaining the link between personality and well-being. In nearly half of the models, psychological flexibility even fully accounted for the effect of personality on well-being.

Conclusion:

These results have important implications for clinical practice, since psychological flexibility, contrary to personality traits, is malleable. Interventions to increase psychological flexibility already exist and are validated in both older and younger samples. They may hold promise to improve well-being.

Keywords

personalitypsychological flexibilitysubjective well-beingageingindirect effectsolder adults
Type
Original Research Article
Information
International Psychogeriatrics , Volume 31 , Issue 9: Issue Theme: Self-Esteem, Resilience, and Emotional Intelligence , September 2019 , pp. 1355 - 1365
Copyright
© International Psychogeriatric Association 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Batink, T., Jansen, G. and de Mey, H. R. A. (2012). De Flexibiliteits Index Test (FIT-60): Een beknopte beschrijving [The flexibility index test (FIT-60): a concise description]. GZ-Psychologie, 5, 18–21. doi: 10.1007/s41480-012-0043-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ben-Porath, Y. S. and Tellegen, A. (2008). MMPI-2-RF (Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form) Manual for Administration, Scoring, and Interpretation. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Boelen, P. A. and Reijntjes, A. (2008). Measuring experiential avoidance: reliability and validity of the Dutch 9-item Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (AAQ). Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 30, 241–251. doi: 10.1007/s10862-008-9082-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bond, F. W. and Bunce, D. (2003). The role of acceptance and job control in mental health, job satisfaction, and work performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 1057–1067. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.6.1057.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bond, F. W., Lloyd, J. and Guenole, N. (2013). The work-related acceptance and action questionnaire: Initial psychometric findings and their implications for measuring psychological flexibility in specific contexts. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 86, 331–347. doi: 10.1111/joop.12001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bond, F. W. et al. (2011). Preliminary psychometric properties of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire–II: a revised measure of psychological flexibility and acceptance. Behavior Therapy, 42, 676–688. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2011.03.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brinkborg, H., Michanek, J., Hesser, H. and Berglund, G. (2011). Acceptance and commitment therapy for the treatment of stress among social workers: a randomized controlled trial. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 49, 389–398. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2011.03.009.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Butler, J. and Ciarrochi, J. (2007). Psychological acceptance and quality of life in the elderly. Quality of Life Research, 16, 607–615. doi: 10.1007/s11136-006-9149-1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Costa, P. T. Jr. and McCrae, R. R. (1992). The five-factor model of personality and its relevance to personality disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders, 6, 343–359. doi: 10.1521/pedi.1992.6.4.343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debast, I. et al. (2014). Personality traits and personality disorders in late middle and old age: do they remain stable? A literature review. Clinical Gerontologist, 37, 253–271. doi: 10.1080/07317115.2014.885917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denissen, J. J. A., Geenen, R., van Aken, M. A. G., Gosling, S. D. and Potter, J. (2008). Development and validation of a Dutch translation of the Big Five Inventory (BFI). Journal of Personality Assessment, 90, 152–157. doi: 10.1080/00223890701845229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Vries, J. and Van Heck, G. L. (1996). De Nederlandse versie van de WHOQOL-Bref [The Dutch Version of the WHOQOL-Bref]. Tilburg: Tilburg University.Google Scholar
Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being. The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 55, 34–43. doi: 10.1037//003-066X.55.1.34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E. and Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276–302. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engelen, U., De Peuter, S., Victoir, A., Van Diest, I. and Van den Bergh, O. (2006). Verdere validering van de Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) en vergelijking van twee Nederlandstalige versies [Further validation of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) and comparison of two Dutch versions.]. Gedrag en gezondheid, 34, 61–70. doi: 10.1007/BF03087979.Google Scholar
English, T. and Carstensen, L. (2014). Emotional experience in the mornings and the evenings: consideration of age differences in specific emotions by time of day. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 185. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Estrada, C. A., Isen, A. M. and Young, M. J. (1997). Positive affect facilitates integration of information and decreases anchoring in reasoning among physicians. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 72, 117–135. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1997.2734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flaxman, P. E., Bond, F. W. and Livheim, F. (2013). The Mindful and Effective Employee: An Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Training Manual for Improving Well-Being and Performance. Oakland: New Harbinger Publications.Google Scholar
Fledderus, M., Bohlmeijer, E. T., Fox, J.-P., Schreurs, K. M. G. and Spinhoven, P. (2013). The role of psychological flexibility in a self-help acceptance and commitment therapy intervention for psychological distress in a randomized controlled trial. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 51, 142–151. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2012.11.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fledderus, M., Bohlmeijer, E. T., Smit, F. and Westerhof, G. J. (2010). Mental health promotion as a new goal in public mental health care: a randomized controlled trial of an intervention enhancing psychological flexibility. American Journal of Public Health, 100, 2372–2378. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2010.196196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E. and McHugh, P. R. (1975). Mini-Mental State: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189–198.10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gámez, W., Chmielewski, M., Kotov, R., Ruggero, C. and Watson, D. (2011). Development of a measure of experiential avoidance: the multidimensional experiential avoidance questionnaire. Psychological Assessment, 23, 692–713. doi: 10.1037/a0023242.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gloster, A. T., Klotsche, J., Chaker, S., Hummel, K. V., and Hoyer, J. (2011). Assessing psychological flexibility: what does it add above and beyond existing constructs? Psychological Assessment, 23, 970–982. doi: 10.1037/a0024135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gray, J. A. (1970). The psychophysiological basis of introversion-extraversion. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 8, 249–266. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(70)90069-0.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harkness, A. R. and McNulty, J. L. (2007). Restructured versions of the MMPI-2 Personality Psychopathology five (PSY-5) scales. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Harris, M. A., Brett, C. E., Starr, J. M., Deary, I. J. and Johnson, W. (2016). Personality and other lifelong influences on older-age health and wellbeing: preliminary findings in two Scottish samples. European Journal of Personality, 30, 438–455. doi: 10.1002/per.2068.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hayes, A. (2013). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis. A Regression-Based Approach. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Hayes, S. C., Luoma, J. B., Bond, F. W. and Lillis, J. (2006). Acceptance and commitment therapy: model, process and outcomes. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44, 1–25. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2005.06.006.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. and Wilson, K. G. (1999). Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: An Experiential Approach to Behavior Change. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Helmes, E. and Ward, B. G. (2017). Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for anxiety symptoms in older adults in residential care. Aging and Mental Health, 21, 272–278. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2015.1111862.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacobs, N., Kleen, M., De Groot, F. and A-Tjak, J. (2008). Het meten van experiëntiële vermijding. De Nederlandstalige versie van de Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II (AAQ-II) [The measurement of experiential avoidance. The Dutch version of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II (AAQ-II)]. Gedragstherapie, 41, 349–361.Google Scholar
John, O. P. and Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: history, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In: Pervin, L. A. and John, O. P. (eds.), Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research (pp. 102–138). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Kashdan, T. B. and Rottenberg, J. (2010). Psychological flexibility as a fundamental aspect of health. Clinical Psychology Review, 30, 865–878. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.03.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kok, R. and Verhey, F. (2002). Gestandaardiseerde versie van de Mini-Mental State Examination [Standardized Version of the Mini-Mental State Examination] (Folstein et al., 1975).Google Scholar
Labouvie-Vief, G. (2003). Dynamic integration: affect, cognition, and the self in adulthood. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 201–206. doi: 10.1046/j.0963-7214.2003.01262.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latzman, R. D. and Masuda, A. (2013). Examining mindfulness and psychological inflexibility within the framework of Big Five personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 55, 129–134. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2013.02.019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, C. T., Segal, D. L. and Coolidge, F. L. 2015. Anxiety sensitivity, experiential avoidance and mindfulness among younger and older adults: age differences in risk factors for anxiety symptoms. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 81, 217–240. doi: 10.1177/0091415015621309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mathur, S., Sharma, M. P. and Bharath, S. (2016). Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy in patients with late-life depression: a case series. International Journal of Yoga, 9, 168–172. doi: 10.4103/0973-6131.183711.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCrae, R. R. and Costa, P. T. (1991). Adding Liebe und Arbeit– the full 5-factor model and well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 227–232. doi: 10.1177/014616729101700217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Bryant, S. E. et al. (2008). Detecting dementia with the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) in highly educated individuals. JAMA Neurology, 65, 963–967. doi: 10.1001/archneur.65.7.963.Google Scholar
Preacher, K. J. and Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891. doi: 10.3758/BRM.40.3.879.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raes, A. K., Bruyneel, L., Loeys, T., Moerkerke, B. and De Raedt, R. (2015). Mindful attention and awareness mediates the association between age and negative affect. Journals of Gerontology Series B-Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 70, 179–188. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbt074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rammstedt, B. and Farmer, R. F. (2013). The impact of acquiescence on the evaluation of personality structure. Psychological Assessment, 25, 1137–1145. doi: 10.1037/a0033323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwartz, R. M., Reynolds, C. F. III, Thase, M. E., Frank, E. and Fasiczka, A. L. (2002). Optimal and normal affect balance in psychotherapy of major depression: evaluation of the balance states of mind model. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 30, 439–450. doi: 10.1017/S1352465802004058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, W., Daly, A., Yu, L. and McCracken, L. M. (2017). Treatment of chronic pain for adults 65 and over: analyses of outcomes and changes in psychological flexibility following interdisciplinary Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT). Pain Medicine, 18, 252–264. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnw073.Google Scholar
Smout, M. F., Hayes, L., Atkins, P. W. B., Klausen, J. and Duguid, J. E. (2012). The empirically supported status of acceptance and commitment therapy: an update. Clinical Psychologist, 16, 97–109. doi: 10.111/j.1742-9552.2012.00051.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soto, C. J. (2015). Is happiness good for your personality? Concurrent and prospective relations of the big five with subjective well-being. Journal of Personality, 83, 45–55. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12081.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Statistics Belgium. (2016). Statbel: Belgie in cijfers. Retrieved from: https://bestat.statbel.fgov.be/bestat/crosstable.xhtml?view=1b9e219b-0387-4a70-880a-dc5eccaa244c.Google Scholar
Steel, P., Schmidt, J. and Shulz, J. (2008). Refining the relationship between personality and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 138–161. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.1.138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steenhaut, P., Demeyer, I., De Raedt, R. and Rossi, G. (2017). The role of personality in the assessment of subjective and physiological emotional reactivity: a comparison between younger and older adults. Assessment, 25, 285–301. doi: 10.1177/1073191117719510.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tauber, B., Wahl, H.-W. and Schröder, J. (2016). Personality and life satisfaction over 12 years. The Journal of Gerontopsychology and Geriatric Psychiatry, 29, 37–48. doi: 10.1024/1662-9647/a000141.Google Scholar
Van der Heijden, P., Derksen, J., Egger, J., Rossi, G., Laheij, M. and Bögels, T. (2013). MMPI- 2-RF. Handleiding voor afname, scoring en interpretatie. [MMPI-2-RF. Manual for Assesment, Scoring and Interpretation.]. Nijmegen: Pen Tests.Google Scholar
Watson, D., Clark, L. A. and Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.1063.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
WHOQOL Group (1996). WHOQOL-Bref. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Steenhaut et al. supplementary material

Appendix

Download Steenhaut et al. supplementary material(File)
File 29.5 KB