Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T19:23:52.894Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lost and found in translation: reflections on cross-cultural adaptation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2021

Awais Aftab Open the ORCID record for Awais Aftab [Opens in a new window]
Awais Aftab*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA Ohio Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services, Northcoast Behavioral HealthcareNorthfield, OH, USA
*
Email: awaisaftab@gmail.com
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentary
Information
International Psychogeriatrics , Volume 33 , Special Issue 1: Issue Theme: Assessment of Risk Markers for Cognitive Impairment , January 2021 , pp. 7 - 9
Copyright
© International Psychogeriatric Association 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F. and Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 25, 3186–3191. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, B. (2018). The original is unfaithful to the translation: towards recognising originality in translation. Neke. The New Zealand Journal of Translation Studies, 1, 1–29. doi: 10.26686/neke.v1i1.5158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dominguez, J. C. etal. (2013). Adaptation of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment for elderly Filipino patients. East Asian Archives of Psychiatry, 23, 80–85. https://www.easap.asia/index.php/component/k2/item/199-1303-v23n3-p80.Google ScholarPubMed
Franzen, S. etal. (2019). A systematic review of neuropsychological tests for the assessment of dementia in non-western, low-educated or illiterate populations. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 1–21. doi: 10.1017/S1355617719000894.Google ScholarPubMed
Lee, J. Y. etal. (2008). Brief screening for mild cognitive impairment in elderly outpatient clinic: validation of the Korean version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment. Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology, 21, 104–110. doi: 10.1177/0891988708316855.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marshall, G. A. etal. (2015). Functional activities questionnaire items that best discriminate and predict progression from clinically normal to mild cognitive impairment. Current Alzheimer Research, 12, 493–502. doi: 10.2174/156720501205150526115003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sajatovic, M. etal. (2018). The Community-targeted Self-management of Epilepsy and Mental Illness (C-TIME) initiative: a research, community, and healthcare administration partnership to reduce epilepsy burden. Epilepsy and Behavior, 89, 175–180. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2018.10.004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sajatovic, M. etal. (2016). Targeted self-management of epilepsy and mental illness for individuals with epilepsy and psychiatric comorbidity. Epilepsy and Behavior, 64, 152–159. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2016.08.012.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sikkes, S. A. etal. (2012). A new informant-based questionnaire for instrumental activities of daily living in dementia. Alzheimer’s and Dementia, 8, 536–543. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.08.006.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stringer, G., Leroi, I., Sikkes, S., Montaldi, D. and Brown, L. (2020). Enhancing ‘meaningfulness’ of functional assessments: UK adaptation of the Amsterdam IADL questionnaire. International Psychogeriatrics, 33, 39–50. doi: 10.1017/S1041610219001881.Google Scholar
Uysal-Bozkir, O., Parlevliet, J. L. and de Rooij, S. E. (2013). Insufficient cross-cultural adaptations and psychometric properties for many translated health assessment scales: a systematic review. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 66, 608–618. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.12.004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed