Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T06:14:46.220Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A novel approach to assessing memory at the population level: vulnerability to semantic interference

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 January 2010

Beth E. Snitz ,
David A. Loewenstein ,
Chung-Chou H. Chang ,
Ching-Wen Lee ,
Joni Vander Bilt ,
Judith Saxton  and
Mary Ganguli
Beth E. Snitz*
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, U.S.A.
David A. Loewenstein
Affiliation:
Departments of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and Neurology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, U.S.A. Wien Center for Alzheimer's Disease and Memory Disorders, Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami Beach, FL, U.S.A.
Chung-Chou H. Chang
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA Department of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA, U.S.A.
Ching-Wen Lee
Affiliation:
Department of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA, U.S.A.
Joni Vander Bilt
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, U.S.A.
Judith Saxton
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, U.S.A.
Mary Ganguli
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, U.S.A. Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, U.S.A. Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA, U.S.A.
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: Beth E. Snitz, PhD, Department of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh, 3471 Fifth Avenue, Suite 802, Pittsburgh, PA 15213. U.S.A. Phone: +1 412-692-4820; Fax: +1 412-692-4031. Email: snitzbe@upmc.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background: There is increasing interest in identifying novel cognitive paradigms to help detect preclinical dementia. Promising results have been found in clinical settings using the Semantic Interference Test (SIT), a modification of an existing episodic memory test (Fuld Object Memory Evaluation) that exploits vulnerability to semantic interference in Alzheimer's disease. It is not yet known how broadly this work will generalize to the community at large.

Methods: Participants aged ≥65 years from the Monongahela-Youghiogheny Healthy Aging Team (MYHAT) were administered the SIT at study entry. Independent of neuropsychological assessment, participants were rated on the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scale, based on reported loss of cognitively driven everyday functioning. In individuals free of dementia (CDR <1), the concurrent validity of the SIT was assessed by determining its association with CDR using multiple logistic regression models, with CDR 0 (no dementia) vs. 0.5 (possible dementia) as the outcome and the SIT test variables as predictors.

Results: Poorer performance on all SIT variables but one was associated with higher CDR reflecting possible dementia (Odds Ratios 2.24–4.79). Younger age and female gender also conferred a performance advantage. Years of education and reading ability (a proxy for quality of education) evidenced a very weak association with SIT performance.

Conclusions: The SIT shows promise as a valid, novel measure to identify early preclinical dementia in a community setting. It has potential utility for assessment of persons who may be illiterate or of low education. Finally, we provide normative SIT data stratified by age which may be utilized by clinicians or researchers in future investigations.

Keywords

neuropsychological testsnormscognitive agingSemantic Interference TestAlzheimer's disease
Type
Research Article
Information
International Psychogeriatrics , Volume 22 , Issue 5 , August 2010 , pp. 785 - 794
Copyright
Copyright © International Psychogeriatric Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Backman, L., Jones, S., Berger, A.-K., Laukka, E. J. and Small, B. J. (2005). Cognitive impairment in preclinical Alzheimer's disease: a meta-analysis. Neuropsychology, 19, 520–531.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buschke, H. (1973). Selective reminding for analysis of memory and learning. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 543–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buschke, H., Sliwinski, M. J., Kuslansky, G. and Lipton, R. B. (1997). Diagnosis of early dementia by the Double Memory Test: encoding specificity improves diagnostic sensitivity and specificity. Neurology, 48, 989–997.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Delis, D. C., Kramer, J. H., Kaplan, E. and Ober, B. A. (2000). California Verbal Learning Test – II. San Antionio, TX: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E. and McHugh, P. R. (1975). “Mini-mental state”: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189–198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fuld, P. A. (1981). Fuld Object-Memory Evaluation. Woodale, IL: Stoelting Company.Google Scholar
Ganguli, M., Snitz, B., Vander Bilt, J. and Chang, C.-C. H. (2009). How much do depressive symptoms affect cognition at the population level? The Monongahela-Youghiogheny Healthy Aging Team (MYHAT) study. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 24, 1277–1284.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hodges, J. R., Salmon, D. P. and Butters, N. (1992). Semantic memory impairment in Alzheimer's disease: failure of access or degraded knowledge? Neuropsychologia, 30, 301–314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hughes, C. P., Berg, L., Danziger, W. L., Coben, L. A. and Martin, R. L. (1982). A new clinical scale for the staging of dementia. British Journal of Psychiatry, 140, 566–572.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loewenstein, D. A. et al. (1991). The occurrence of different intrusive errors in patients with Alzheimer's disease, multiple cerebral infarctions, and major depression. Brain and Cognition, 16, 104–117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loewenstein, D. A. et al. (2003). Semantic interference in mild Alzheimer disease: preliminary findings. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 11, 252–255.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loewenstein, D. A., Acevedo, A., Luis, C., Crum, T., Barker, W. W. and Duara, R. (2004). Semantic interference deficits and the detection of mild Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment without dementia. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 10, 91–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loewenstein, D. A., Acevedo, A., Agron, J. and Duara, R. (2007). Vulnerability to proactive semantic interference and progression to dementia among older adults with mild cognitive impairment. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, 24, 363–368.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manly, J. J., Jacobs, D. M., Touradji, P., Small, S. A. and Stern, Y. (2002). Reading level attenuates differences in neuropsychological test performance between African American and White elders.[erratum appears in J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2002 May;8(4):605]. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 8, 341–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masur, D. M., Sliwinski, M., Lipton, R. B., Blau, A. D. and Crystal, H. A. (1994). Neuropsychological prediction of dementia and the absence of dementia in healthy elderly persons. Neurology, 44, 1427–1432.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mitrushina, M., Boone, K. B., Razani, J. and D'Elia, L. F. (2005). Handbook of Normative Data for Neuropsychological Assessment. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Morris, J. C., McKeelD. W., Jr. D. W., Jr., Fulling, K., Torack, R. M. and Berg, L. (1988). Validation of clinical diagnostic criteria for Alzheimer's disease. Annals of Neurology, 24, 17–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mungas, D., Marshall, S. C., Weldon, M., Haan, M. and Reed, B. R. (1996). Age and education correction of Mini-Mental State Examination for English and Spanish-speaking elderly. Neurology, 46, 700–706.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prince, M. (2000). Methodological issues for population-based research into dementia in developing countries. A position paper from the 10/66 Dementia Research Group. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 15, 21–30.3.0.CO;2-5>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schram, L., Rubert, M. and Lowewenstein, D. A. (1995). A qualitative analyis of intrusive errors in Alzheimer's disease. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 10, 255–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar