Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T15:55:10.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A study of severe domestic squalor: 173 cases referred to an old age psychiatry service

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 August 2010

John Snowdon  and
Graeme Halliday
John Snowdon*
Affiliation:
Discipline of Psychological Medicine, University of Sydney, Concord Hospital, Sydney, Australia
Graeme Halliday
Affiliation:
Sydney South West Area Health Service, Concord Hospital, Sydney, Australia
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: Professor John Snowdon, Discipline of Psychological Medicine, University of Sydney, Concord Hospital, N.S.W. 2139, Australia. Phone: +61-2-97675000; Fax: +61-2-97678951. Email: jsnowdon@mail.usyd.edu.au.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background: Although community psychiatric services commonly encounter cases where intervention is needed due to persons’ unclean or cluttered living conditions, evidence concerning the referral rate and prevalence of severe domestic squalor is sparse.

Methods: Between 2000 and 2009, ratings of cleanliness and clutter have been made in all cases of people living in squalor who have been referred to an old age psychiatry service in Central Sydney. Where possible, one-year follow-up was arranged.

Results: 173 persons aged 65 years or more were referred to the service during the ten years and assessed as living in squalor (120 moderate or severe, two thirds of whom showed a moderate or severe degree of hoarding/clutter). Of 157 followed up after one year, 47% were still at home, 32% were in long-term care homes, 12% had moved elsewhere, and 9% had died. The annual new referral rate was close to 1 per 1000 elderly people in the catchment area, and of moderate or severe squalor was 0.66 per 1000. Limiting follow-up to those in moderate or severe squalor, 41% were still at home one year later. Current findings suggest that the minimum prevalence in the community of older people living in moderate or severe squalor in Sydney is 1 per 1000.

Conclusions: The costs of intervening in cases of severe domestic squalor are considerable. Increased attention and funding are warranted, as the incidence and prevalence are higher than had previously been estimated.

Keywords

squalorDiogenesprevalenceincidenceoutcomeuncleanlinessrating scaleold agehoardingpsychiatric diagnosis
Type
Research Article
Information
International Psychogeriatrics , Volume 23 , Issue 2 , March 2011 , pp. 308 - 314
Copyright
Copyright © International Psychogeriatric Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chiu, S. N., Chong, H. C. and Lau, S. P. F. (2003). Exploratory study of hoarding behaviour in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Journal of Psychiatry, 13, 23–30.Google Scholar
Frost, R. O. and Gross, R. C. (1993). The hoarding of possessions. Behavioral Research and Therapy, 31, 367–381.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frost, R. O., Steketee, G. and Williams, L. (2000). Hoarding: a community health problem. Health and Community Care in the Community, 8, 229–234.Google ScholarPubMed
Grisham, J. R., Brown, T. A., Liverant, G. I. and Campbell-Sills, L. (2005). The distinctiveness or compulsive hoarding from obsessive-compulsive disorder. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 19, 767–779.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Halliday, G. and Snowdon, J. (2009). The Environmental Cleanliness and Clutter Scale (ECCS). International Psychogeriatrics, 2009, 21, 1041–1050.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Halliday, G., Banerjee, S., Philpot, M. and Macdonald, A. (2000). Community study of people who live in squalor. Lancet, 355, 882–886.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iervolino, A. C. et al. (2009). Prevalence and heritability of compulsive hoarding: a twin study. American Journal of Psychiatry, 166, 1156–1161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, H.-J., Steketee, G. and Frost, R. O. (2001). Hoarding by elderly people. Health and Social Work, 26, 176–184. Erratum, Health and Social Work, 26, 234.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Macmillan, D. and Shaw, P. (1966). Senile breakdown in standards of personal and environmental cleanliness. BMJ, 2, 1032–1037.Google Scholar
Maier, T. (2004). On phenomenology and classification of hoarding: a review. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 110, 323–337.Google Scholar
McDermott, S. and Gleeson, R. (2009). Evaluation of the Severe Domestic Squalor Project: Final Report. Sydney: Social Welfare Research Centre, University of New South Wales.Google Scholar
Pertusa, A., Fullana, M. A., Singh, S., Alonso, P., Menchón, J. M. and Mataix-Cols, D. (2008). Compulsive hoarding: OCD symptom, distinct clinical syndrome, or both? American Journal of Psychiatry, 165, 1289–1298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Samios, K. (1996). Into the loathsome den: the characteristics of persons living in squalor. Unpublished dissertation. Sydney: Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists.Google Scholar
Samuels, J. F. et al. (2008). Prevalence and correlates of hoarding behaviour in a community-based sample. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 46, 836–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snowdon, J. and Halliday, G. (2009). How and when to intervene in cases of severe domestic squalor. International Psychogeriatrics, 21, 996–1002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snowdon, J., Shah, A. and Halliday, G. (2007). Severe domestic squalor: a review. International Psychogeriatrics, 19, 37–51.Google Scholar
Wrigley, M. and Cooney, C. (1992). Diogenes syndrome – an Irish series. Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine, 9, 37–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar