Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T11:41:42.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The wills of older people: risk factors for undue influence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2008

C. Peisah ,
S. Finkel ,
K. Shulman ,
P. Melding ,
J. Luxenberg ,
J. Heinik ,
R. Jacoby ,
B. Reisberg ,
G. Stoppe  and
A. Barker
...Show all authors
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background: As people live longer, there is increasing potential for mental disorders to interfere with testamentary distribution and render older people more vulnerable to “undue influence” when they are making a will. Accordingly, clinicians dealing with the mental disorders of older people will be called upon increasingly to advise the courts about a person's vulnerability to undue influence.

Method: A Subcommittee of the IPA Task Force on Testamentary Capacity and Undue Influence undertook to establish consensus on the definition of undue influence and the provision of guidelines for expert assessment of risk factors for undue influence.

Results: International jurisdictions differ in their approach to the notion of undue influence. Despite differences in legal systems, from a clinical perspective, the subcommittee identified some common “red flags” which might alert the expert to risk of undue influence. These include: (i) social or environmental risk factors such as dependency, isolation, family conflict and recent bereavement; (ii) psychological and physical risk factors such as physical disability, deathbed wills, sexual bargaining, personality disorders, substance abuse and mental disorders including dementia, delirium, mood and paranoid disorders; and (iii) legal risk factors such as unnatural provisions in a will, or provisions not in keeping with previous wishes of the person making the will, and the instigation or procurement of a will by a beneficiary.

Conclusion: This review provides some guidance for experts who are requested by the courts to provide an opinion on the risk of undue influence. Whilst international jurisdictions require different thresholds of proof for a finding of undue influence, there is good international consensus on the clinical indicators for the concept.

Keywords

willtestamentaryundue influencecapacityolder people
Type
Review Article
Information
International Psychogeriatrics , Volume 21 , Issue 1 , February 2009 , pp. 7 - 15
Copyright
Copyright © International Psychogeriatric Association 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

C. E. C. (1916). Confidential relations and the burden of proof of undue influence in will cases. Yale Law Journal, 26, 62–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Champine, P. (2006). Expertise and instinct in the assessment of testamentary capacity. Villanova Law Review, 51, 25–94.Google Scholar
Clayton, V. (2008). Alcohol and the elderly: the potential for undue influence while under the influence. Elder Law, 22. Available at www.ceb.com/newsletterv22/1EldLaw.asp.Google Scholar
Dainow, J. (1938). Resricted testation in New Zealand, Australia and Canada. Michigan Law Review, 36, 1107–1130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harpaz, J. and Zaslansky, M. (eds.) (1990). Inheritance in Israel for the Layman and the Lawyer. Haifa: Haifa Law Publishers.Google Scholar
Hughes, C. P., Berg, L., Danziger, W. L., Coben, L. A. and Martin, R. L. (1982). A new clinical scale for the staging of dementia. British Journal of Psychiatry, 140, 566–572.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kerridge, R. (2000). Wills made in suspicious circumstances: the problem of the vulnerable testator. Cambridge Law Journal, 59, 310–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kertesz, A. and Clydesdale, S. (1994). Neuropsychological deficits in vascular dementia vs Alzheimer's disease. Archives of Neurology, 51, 1226–1231.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knight, B. (1986). Psychotherapy with Older Adults. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Langbein, J. H. (1994). Undue influence: the epic battle for the Johnson & Johnson fortune by David Margolick. Yale Law Journal, 103, 2039–2048.Google Scholar
Masterman, D. L. and Cummings, J. L. (1997). Frontal-subcortical circuits: the anatomic basis of executive, social and motivated behaviors. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 11, 107–114.Google Scholar
New South Wales Law Reform Commission (1986). Wills: Execution and Revocation. Report N47 at paragraph 8.34.Google Scholar
P. B. (1913). What circumstances will raise a presumption of undue influence in the execution of a will? Michigan Law Review, 11, 513–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peisah, C., Brodaty, H. and Quadrio, C. (2006). Family conflict in dementia: prodigal sons and black sheep International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 21, 485–492.Google Scholar
Peisah, C., Brodaty, H. and Bridger, M. (2008). Abuse by marriage: the exploitation of mentally ill older people. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 23, 883–888.Google Scholar
Posener, H. D. and Jacoby, R. (2002). Testamentary capacity. In Jacoby, R. and Oppenheimer, C.. (eds.), Psychiatry in the Elderly, 3rd edn (pp. 932–940). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pyke, K. D. and Bengston, V. L. (1996). Care more or less: individualistic and collectivist systems of family elder care. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 379–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ready, R. E. et al. (2003). Apathy and executive dysfunction in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer disease. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 11, 222–228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reisberg, B., Ferris, S. H., de Leon, M. J. and Crook, T. (1982). The Global Deterioration Scale for assessment of primary degenerative dementia. American Journal of Psychiatry, 139, 1136–1139.Google ScholarPubMed
Ridge, P. (2004). Equitable undue influence and wills. Law Quarterly Review, 120, 617–639.Google Scholar
Sclan, S. G. and Reisberg, B. (1992) Functional assessment staging (FAST) in Alzheimer's disease: reliability, validity and ordinality. International Psychogeriatrics, 4 (Suppl.1), S55–S69.Google Scholar
Shoet, S. (2001). Imperfections in Wills. 2nd edn. Tel Aviv: Institute for Research in Law and Economy (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
Shulman, K., Cohen, C. A., Kirsh, F. C., Hull, I. M. and Champine, P. R. (2007) Assessment of testamentary capacity and vulnerability to undue influence. American Journal of Psychiatry, 164, 722–727.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shulman, K. et al. (2008). Contemporaneous Assessment of Testamentary Capacity. A Consensus Report from the IPA Task Force on Testamentary Capacity and Undue Influence (unpublished manuscript).Google Scholar
Spar, J. E. and Garb, A. S. (1992) Assessing competency to make a will. American Journal of Psychiatry, 149, 169–174.Google ScholarPubMed