Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T10:51:22.001Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The costs of incarceration for families of prisoners

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 December 2017

Megan Comfort ,
Tasseli McKay ,
Justin Landwehr ,
Erin Kennedy ,
Christine Lindquist  and
Anupa Bir
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Family members of incarcerated people are often faced with financial, social and emotional costs related to the imprisonment of their loved ones. These costs can be conceptualized as investments both in the sustenance of personal relationships and in a greater social good in the form of assisting with the reintegration of former prisoners. In this article, we draw upon data from a mixed-methods study to elucidate the costs of detention on families of prisoners. We demonstrate that financial, social and emotional costs associated with imprisonment of a family member are interrelated and often compound each other, indicating the importance of addressing them in a holistic framework.

Keywords

familiesprisonersincarcerationrelationshipscosts
Type
Overview of the humanitarian challenge
Information
International Review of the Red Cross , Volume 98 , Issue 903: Detention: Addressing the human cost , December 2016 , pp. 783 - 798
Copyright
Copyright © icrc 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See the Institute for Criminal Policy Research's World Prison Brief website, available at: www.prisonstudies.org/info/worldbrief/ (all internet references were accessed in June 2017).

2 Forman, James Jr, Locking Up Our Own: Crime and Punishment in Black America, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York, 2017 Google Scholar; Tonry, Michael, Malign Neglect: Race, Crime, and Punishment in America, Oxford University Press, New York, 1995 Google Scholar; Wacquant, Loïc, “Suitable Enemies: Foreigners and Immigrants in the Prisons of Europe”, Punishment & Society, Vol. 1, No. 2, 1999 Google Scholar; Zimring, Franklin E. and Hawkins, Gordon J., The Scale of Imprisonment, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 1991 Google Scholar.

3 Lee, Hedwig et al. , “Racial Inequalities in Connectedness to Imprisoned Individuals in the United States”, Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race, Vol. 12, No. 2, 2015 Google Scholar; da Cunha, Manuela Ivone P., “Closed Circuits: Kinship, Neighborhood and Incarceration in Urban Portugal”, Ethnography, Vol. 9, No. 3, 2008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Wakefield, Sara, Lee, Hedwig and Wildeman, Christopher, “Tough on Crime, Tough on Families? Criminal Justice and Family Life in America”, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 665, No. 1, 2016 Google Scholar; Comfort, Megan, Doing Time Together: Love and Family in the Shadow of the Prison, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 2008 Google Scholar; Braman, Donald, Doing Time on the Outside: Incarceration and Family Life in Urban America, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI, 2004 Google Scholar, Ricordeau, Gwénola, Les détenus et leurs proches: Solidarités et sentiments à l'ombre des murs, Éd. Autrement, Paris, 2008 Google Scholar.

4 Hairston, Creasie Finney, “Family Ties during Imprisonment: Important to Whom and for What?”, Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, Vol. 18, No. 1, 1991 Google Scholar; Pattillo, Mary, Weiman, David and Western, Bruce (eds), Imprisoning America: The Social Effects of Mass Incarceration, Russell Sage Foundation, New York, 2004 Google Scholar.

5 Vigne, Nancy G. La et al. , “Examining the Effect of Incarceration and In-Prison Family Contact on Prisoners’ Family Relationships”, Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, Vol. 21, No. 4, 2005 Google Scholar; Bales, William D. and Mears, Daniel P., “Inmate Social Ties and the Transition to Society: Does Visitation Reduce Recidivism?”, Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, Vol. 45, No. 3, 2008 Google Scholar; Beckmeyer, Jonathon J. and Arditti, Joyce A., “Implications of In-Person Visits for Incarcerated Parents’ Family Relationships and Parenting Experience”, Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, Vol. 53, No. 2, 2014 Google Scholar.

6 D. Braman, above note 3; M. Comfort, above note 3; Lindquist, Christine et al. , The Experiences of Families during a Father's Incarceration: Descriptive Findings from Baseline Data Collection for the Evaluation of Marriage and Family Strengthening Grants for Incarcerated and Reentering Fathers and Their Partners, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC, 2015 Google Scholar.

7 Western, Bruce et al. , “Stress and Hardship after Prison”, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 120, No. 5, 2015 Google Scholar; Visher, Christy A. et al. , Baltimore Prisoners’ Experiences Returning Home, Urban Institute, Washington, DC, 2004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 Garland, David (ed.), Mass Imprisonment: Social Causes and Consequences, Sage, London, 2001 Google Scholar.

9 Lars Anderson, “Duration and Frequency of Paternal Incarceration and Youth Outcomes”, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 2016; Condry, Rachel, Families Shamed: The Consequences of Crime for Relatives of Serious Offenders, Willan, Cullompton, 2007 Google Scholar; Granja, Rafaela, “Beyond Prison Walls: The Experiences of Prisoners’ Relatives and Meanings Associated with Imprisonment”, Probation Journal, Vol. 63, No. 3, 2016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Halsey, Mark and Deegan, Simone, “Father and Son: Two Generations through Prison”, Punishment & Society, Vol. 14, No. 3, 2012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hutton, Marie, “Visiting Time: A Tale of Two Prisons”, Probation Journal, Vol. 63, No. 3, 2016 Google Scholar; Moran, Dominique, “Between Outside and Inside? Prison Visiting Rooms as Liminal Carceral Spaces”, GeoJournal, Vol. 78, No. 2, 2013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; R. Gwénola, above note 3; Touraut, Caroline, La famille à l’épreuve de la prison, PUF, Paris, 2012 Google Scholar.

10 See: https://aspe.hhs.gov/evaluation-marriage-and-family-strengthening-grants-incarcerated-and-reentering-fathers-and-their-partners; see also the forthcoming special issue of the Journal of Offender Rehabilitation dedicated to articles describing the study and its findings.

11 Relationship strengthening programming provided through this initiative is described in detail in “The Implementation of Family Strengthening Programs for Families Affected by Incarceration”, available at: https://aspe.hhs.gov/pdf-report/implementation-family-strengthening-programs-families-affected-incarceration.

12 For more details on the MFS-IP study design and sample, see Christine Lindquist, Danielle Steffey, Tasseli McKay, Megan Comfort and Anupa Bir, “The Multi-Site Family Study on Incarceration, Partnering and Parenting: Design and Sample”, Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, forthcoming.

13 See: https://aspe.hhs.gov/evaluation-marriage-and-family-strengthening-grants-incarcerated-and-reentering-fathers-and-their-partners.

14 C. Lindquist et al., above note 6.

15 Interview with study participant, on file with authors.

16 Interview with study participant, on file with authors.

17 Interview with study participant, on file with authors.

18 Interview with study participant, on file with authors.

19 Interview with study participant, on file with authors.

20 Interview with study participant, on file with authors.

21 Interview with study participant, on file with authors.

22 Interview with study participant, on file with authors.

23 Interview with study participant, on file with authors.

24 Interview with study participant, on file with authors.

25 Lindquist, Christine, Comfort, Megan, Landwehr, Justin, Feinberg, Rose, Cohen, Julia, McKay, Tasseli and Bir, Anupa, Change in Father-Child Relationships Before, During, and After Incarceration, Research Brief prepared for the US Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, March 2016 Google Scholar.

26 Interview with study participant, on file with authors.

27 Interview with study participant, on file with authors.

28 Interview with study participant, on file with authors.

29 Interview with study participant, on file with authors.

30 Interview with study participant, on file with authors.

31 Interview with study participant, on file with authors.

32 Interview with study participant, on file with authors.

33 Interview with study participant, on file with authors.