Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:35:02.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Developing standards in international forensic work to identify missing persons

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 April 2010

Stephen Cordner  and
Helen McKelvie
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research Article
Information
International Review of the Red Cross , Volume 84 , Issue 848: Missing persons/Personnes disparues , December 2002 , pp. 867 - 884
Copyright
Copyright © International Committee of the Red Cross 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Kirschner, R. and Hannibal, K., “The application of forensic sciences to human rights investigations”: Medicine Science and Law, Vol. 13, 1994, p. 453.Google Scholar

2 Kirschner, and Hannibal, , op. cit. (note 1), p. 451.Google Scholar

3 Hannibal, K. and Lawrence, R., “The health professional as human rights promoter: Ten years of physicians for human rights (USA)”, Health and Human Rights, Vol. 2, No. 1, p. 112.Google Scholar

4 Ibid., p. 113.

5 Over the last 16 years PHR, based in Boston, has sent more than 75 medical and forensic teams to dozens of countries to carry out forensic investigations, including exhumations and autopsies of deceased victims of alleged torture and extrajudicial executions in Brazil, Israel, Czechoslovakia, Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador, Iraqi Kurdistan, Kuwait, Mexico, Panama, Rwanda, Thailand, the former Yugoslavia and very recently, Afghanistan. <http://phrusa.org/research/forensic/croatia/forvuk3.html>.

6 <http://www.phrusa.org/research/forensics/index/html>.

7 Blewitt, G., “The role of forensic investigations in genocide prosecutions before an international tribunal”, Medical Science Law, Vol. 37, No. 4, 1997, pp. 286–7.Google Scholar

8 <http://www.phrusa.org/research/forensics/index/html>.

9 <http://hrdata.aaas.org/ceh/report/english/recS3.html>.

10 E/CN.4/RES/1993/33 Preamble and para. 3.

11 E/CN.4/RES/1993/31, para. 3.

12 See E/CN.4/1993/2O, 5 February 1993, para. 3 and E/CN.4/1993/20 para. 18.

13 E/CN.4/1998/32, 5 January 1998, 1, D, 3.

14 Blewitt, , op. cit. (note 7), p. 284.Google Scholar

15 Ibid., p. 288.

16 Rainio, J., Lalu, K. and Penttila, A., “Independent forensic autopsies in an armed conflict: Investigation of the victims from Racak, Kosovo”, Forensic Science International, Vol. 116, 2001, p. 166.Google Scholar

17 Sprogoe-Jakobsen, S. et al. “Mobile autopsy teams in the investigation of war crimes in Kosovo 1999”, Journal of Forensic Science, Vol. 46, No. 6, 2001, p. 1392.Google Scholar

18 Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court of 17 July 1998, Art. 5.

19 Blewitt, , op. cit. (note 7), p. 288.Google Scholar

20 Ibid., pp. 277–8.

21 Ibid., p. 288. Emphasis added.

22 A Danish-Swedish team of forensic scientists working for the ICTY have also made this observation. Sprogoe-Jakobsen, et al. op. cit. (note 17), p. 1395.Google Scholar

23 Cordner, S., El Nageh, M., Wells, D., McKelvie, H. and Lineham, B., Ethical Practice in Laboratory Medicine and Forensic PathologyGoogle Scholar, WHO Regional Publication, Eastern Mediterranean Series 20, EMRO, 1999, p. 37.

24 Sprogoe-Jakobsen, et al. op. cit. (note 17), pp. 1392–3.Google Scholar

25 Rainio, et al. op. cit. (note 16), p. 173.Google Scholar

26 Ibid., p. 177.

27 Ibid., p. 171.

28 Ibid.

29 G. Hutchins, Autopsy Committee of the College of American Pathologists, “Practice guidelines for autopsy pathology: Autopsy performance”, Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Vol. 118, 1994, pp. 19–25Google Scholar, and “Practice guidelines for autopsy pathology: Autopsy reporting”, Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Vol. 119, 1995, pp. 123–130Google Scholar; The Royal College of Pathologists, Guidelines on Autopsy Practice, <http://www.rcpath.org>; K. Bove, Autopsy Committee of the College of American Pathologists, “Practice guidelines for autopsy performance: The pre-natal and paediatric autopsy”, Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Vol. 121, 1997, pp. 368–376Google Scholar; J. Powers, Autopsy Committee of the College of American Pathologists, “Practice guidelines for autopsy pathology: Autopsy procedures for brain, spinal cord and neuromuscular systems”, Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Vol. 119, 1995, pp. 777–783.Google Scholar

30 Available from the Interpol website <http://www.interpol.int>.

31 These include World Medical Association; Indo Pacific Association of Law Medicine and Science (INPALMS); World Association of Societies of Pathology; Physicians for Human Rights; European Network of Forensic Science Institutes; American Society of Crime Laboratory Directors (this organization accredits many laboratories outside the US); European Academy of Forensic Sciences; and International Academy of Legal Medicine.