No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 July 2020
Published by Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2018.
1 Internationalized Armed Conflicts in International Law, p. 1.
2 Ibid., p. 4.
3 Ibid., pp. 9–23.
4 Ibid., pp. 9–10.
5 Ibid., pp. 11–14.
6 Ibid., p. 27.
7 For an excellent discussion of many of the concepts and arguments found in Dr Mačák's book, please see the Opinio Juris Symposium that took place in January 2019 – see, for example, Kubo Mačák, “Symposium: Internationalized Armed Conflicts – The Wars of Our Age”, Opinio Juris, 14 January 2019, available at: http://opiniojuris.org/2019/01/14/symposium-internationalized-armed-conflicts-the-wars-of-our-age/ (all internet references were accessed in July 2020).
8 Internationalized Armed Conflicts in International Law, pp. 36–37.
9 The “overall control test” is the test used for determining whether a State has become party to a conflict through its control of a non-State armed group that is party to an existing conflict. See International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, Prosecutor v. Duško Tadić, Case No. IT-94-1-A, Judgment (Appeals Chamber), 15 July 1999, paras 120 ff.
10 In contrast to other possible tests, such as the “effective control test” proposed by the International Court of Justice in the Nicaragua case. Internationalized Armed Conflicts in International Law, pp. 38, 40–46.
11 Ibid., p. 46.
12 Ibid., pp. 39–46.
13 Ibid., p. 89.
14 Ibid., p. 104.
15 Anne Quintin, “Symposium: Reflections on Conflict Classification”, Opinio Juris, 16 January 2019, available at: http://opiniojuris.org/2019/01/16/symposium-reflections-on-conflict-classification/.
16 Internationalized Armed Conflicts in International Law, p. 152.
17 Ibid., p. 155.
18 Ibid., p. 209.
19 Ibid., pp. 211–212.