Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:34:07.201Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The legal nature of the International Criminal Court and the emergence of supranational elements in international criminal justice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 April 2010

Sascha Rolf Lüder
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research Article
Information
International Review of the Red Cross , Volume 84 , Issue 845: Impunité/Impunity , March 2002 , pp. 79 - 92
Copyright
Copyright © International Committee of the Red Cross 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Brownlie, I., Principles of Public International Law, 5th ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1998, pp. 57–58Google Scholar; Epping, V., in Ipsen, K., Völkerrecht, 4th ed., C. H. Beck'sche Verlagsgesellschaft, Munich, 1999, p. 51Google Scholar; Jennings, R. and Watts, A. (eds), Oppenheim's International Law I, 9th ed., Longman/London/New York, 1996, pp. 119–120.Google Scholar

2 Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, 17 July 1998, UN Doc. A/CON F.183/9.

3 Reparation for injuries suffered in the service of the United Nations, Advisory Opinion: I.C.I. Reports 1949, p. 182.

4 See Dörmann, K., “The first and second sessions of the Preparatory Commission for the International Criminal Court”, in YIHL, Vol. 2, 1999, p. 283CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Jarasch, F., “Errichtung, Organisation und Finanzierung des Internationalen Strafgerichtshofs und die Schlußbestimmungen des Statuts”, in HuV-l, Vol. 12, 1999. P. 10Google Scholar; Marchesi, A., in Triffterer, O. (ed.), Commentary on the Rome Statute for the International Criminal Court, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, Baden-Baden, 1999, Article 2, note 11.Google Scholar

5 See Dörmann, op. cit. (note 4), p. 283; Jarasch, op. cit. (note 4), p. 10.; G. A. M. Strijards, in Triffterer, op. cit. (note 4), Article 3, note 5.

6 C. Kreß, in Triffterer, op. cit. (note 4), Article 86, note 3.

7 Epping, in Ipsen, op. cit. (note 1), p. 402.

8 Brownlie, op. cit. (note 1), pp. 678–681; Epping, in Ipsen, op. cit. (note 1), p. 402; Jennings/Watts, op. cit. (note 1), pp. 16–22; I. Seidl-Hohenveldern and Loibl, G., Das Recht der internationalen Organisationen einschliesslich der supranationalen Gemein-schaften, 7th ed., Carl Heymanns Verlag, Cologne/Berlin/Bonn/Munich, 2000, p. 42.Google Scholar

9 Op. cit. (note 3), p. 185.

10 W. Rückert, in Triffterer, op. cit. (note 4), Article 4, note 5.

11 Compare, with regard to the UN and other large international organizations, Higgins, R., Problems and Process: International Law and How We Use It, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1994, p. 48.Google Scholar

12 Epping, in Ipsen, op. cit. (note 1), p. 53; Jennings/Watts, op. cit. (note 1), pp. 16–22, Seidl-Hohenveldern/Loibl, op. cit. (note 8), pp. 39–42.

13 Dominicé, Ch., “L'immunité de juridiction et d'exécution des organizations intenationales”, RdC, 1984–IV, p. 163Google Scholar; Schermers, H. G. and Blokker, N. M., International Institutional Law: Unity within Diversity, 3rd ed., Kluwer Law International, The Hague/Boston/London, 1995, section 1801.Google Scholar

14 See M. Bergsmo, in Triffterer, op. cit. (note 4), Preamble, notes 20–21.

15 For a stimulating first analysis, see C. Kreß and K. Prost, in Triffterer, op. cit. (note 4), Article 87, notes 24–27.

16 Brownlie, op. cit. (note l) , pp. 678–981; Epping, in Ipsen, op. cit. (note 1), pp. 391–392; Jennings/Watts, op. cit. (note 1), pp. 16–22; Schermers/Blokker, op. cit. (note 13), section 34.

17 Rückert, in Triffterer, op. cit. (note 4), Article 4, note 3.

18 Epping, in K. Ipsen, op. cit. (note l), p. 390; Schermers/Blokker, op. cit. (note 13), section 48; Seidl-Hohenveldern'Loibl, op. cit. (note 8), pp. 13–15.

19 Seidl-Hohenveldern'Loibl, op. cit. (note 8), pp. 104–106.

20 Ambos, Compare K., “‘Verbrechenselemente’ sowie Verfahrens- und Beweisregeln des Internationalen Strafgerichtshofs”, in NIW, Vol. 54, 2001, pp. 407–410Google Scholar; Kaul, H.-P., “Der Aufbau des Internationalen Strafgerichtshofs: Schwierigkeiten und Fortschritte”, in VN, Vol. 49, 2001, pp. 215–217.Google Scholar

21 Mosler, H., in Isensee, J. and Kirchhof, P. (eds), Handbuch des Staatsrechts der Bundesrepublik Deutschland VII, C. F. Müller Verlag, Heidelberg, 1992, pp. 609–611Google Scholar; Randelzhofer, A., in Maunz, Th. and Dürig, G. (eds), Grundgesetz: Kommentar, 8th ed., C. H. Beck'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, Munich, 1998, Article 24, para. 1, notes 30,61.Google Scholar

22 Baldus, M., “übertragung von Hoheitsrechten auf ausländische Staaten im Bereich der Sicherheitsverwaltung”, in Die Verwaltung, Vol. 32, 1999, pp. 488–489Google Scholar; Randelzhofer, in Maunz/Durig, op. cit. (note 21), Article 24, para. 2, note 30; Rauser, K. T., Die übertragung von Hoheitsrechten auf ausländische Staaten, C. H. Beck'sche Verlags-buchhandlung, Munich, 1991, p. 34.Google Scholar

23 Epping, in Ipsen, op. cit. (note 1), p. 77; Geiger, R., Grundgesetz und Völkerrecht, 2nd ed., C. H. Beck'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, Munich, 1994, p. 139.Google Scholar

24 Berber, F., Lehrbuch des Volkerrechts III, 2nd ed., C. H. Beck'sche Verlagsbuchhand lung, Munich, 1977, pp. 318–324Google Scholar; Rojahn, O., in von Münch, I. and Kunig, Ph. (eds), Grundgesetz-Kommentar 2, 3rd ed., C. H. Beck'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, Munich, 1995, Article 24, note 43, 48; Seidl-Hohenveldern/Loibl, op. cit. (note 8), pp. 15–16.Google Scholar

25 Tomuschat, Ch., in Abraham, H.-J. (ed.), Bonner Kommentar zum Grundgesetz, 91st ed., C. F. Müller Verlag, Heidelberg, 1999, Article 24, note 114.Google Scholar

26 Geiger, op. cit. (note 23), p. 140.

27 Kreß, C., “Jugoslawien-Strafgerichtshof”, in Grützner, H. and Pötz, P.-G. (eds), Internationaler Rechtshilfeverkehr in Strafsachen, 2nd ed., C. F. Miiller Verlag, Heidelberg, 2000, note 60.Google Scholar

28 ICTY, Trial Chamber I, Judgment of 29 October 1997, Blascic, IT-95-14-AR108 bis, para. 41.

29 See Griesbaum, R., “Über die Verfah- rensgrundsätze des Jugoslawien-Strafgerichts- hofes, auch im Vergleich zum nationalen Recht”, in Fischer, H. and Lüder, S. R. (eds), Völkerrechtliche Verbrechen vor dem jugoslawien-Tribunal, nationalen Gerichten und dem Internationalen Strafgerichtshof, Berlin Verlag Amo Spitz, Berlin, 1999, p. 117Google Scholar; MacLean, J., “The enforcement of the sentence in the Tadic case”, in Fischer, H., Kreß, C. and LÜder, S. R. (eds). International and national prosecution of crimes under international law, Berlin Verlag Arno Spitz, 2001, p. 729.Google Scholar

30 See Benvenuti, P., “Complementarity of the International Criminal Court to national criminal jurisdictions”, in Lattanzi, F. and Schabas, W. (eds), Essays on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court I, Editrice il Sirente, Ripa di Fagnano Alto, 2000, p. 21Google Scholar; Holmes, J., “The principle of complementarity”, in Lee, R. S. (ed.), The international Criminal Court, Kluwer Law International, The Hague/Boston/London, 1999, P. 41.Google Scholar

31 Lagody, Compare O., “Legitimation und Bedeutung des Ständigen Internationalen Gerichtshofes”, in ZStW, Vol. 113, 2001, p. 803.Google Scholar

32 For the details on Article 99, para. 4, of the Statute see Kaul, H.-P. and Kreß, C., “Jurisdiction and cooperation in the Statute of the International Criminal Court: Principles and compromises”, in YIHL, Vol. 2, 1999, pp. 168–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Kreß, C., “Strafen, Strafvoll- streckung und internationale Zusammenarbeit im Statut des Internationalen Strafgerichtshofes”, in HuV-l, Vol. 11, 1998, pp. 160–161Google Scholar; K. Prost and A. Schlunck, in Triffterer, op. cit. (note 4), Article 99, notes 11–29; Lüder, S. R. and Schotten, G., “A guide to State practice concerning international humanitarian law: Germany”, in YIHL, Vol. 3, 2000, in preparation.Google Scholar

33 Kreß, Compare C., “Völkerstrafrecht in Deutschland”, in NStZ, Vol. 20, 2000, p. 623.Google Scholar