No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 April 2010
The author raises the rather daunting question of whether it is possible to justify celebration of the Geneva Conventions despite the enormous suffering caused by war which those Conventions are supposed to prevent. What can international humanitarian law achieve under the present circumstances? The author does not give an easy answer to this question but he asks the right questions, which could lead to at least certain components of a good answer. He goes on to present the project, called “People on War”, that the ICRC has launched to mark the anniversary. The purpose of this unique initiative is to meet people who have been through war and ask them to share their personal experiences with conflict and to say what they expect from humanitarian law. Results of this vast study should be available for the 27th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent, to be held in Geneva later this year.
1 Hassner, Pierre, La violence et la paix: de la bombe atomique au nettoyage ethnique, Éditions ESPRIT, Paris, 1995, p. 12.Google Scholar
2 Datlaire, R.A., «The end of innocence — Rwanda 1994», Moore, J. (ed), Hard Choices, Moral dilemmas in humanitarian intervention, Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, Boulder, New York, Oxford, 1998, p. 71Google Scholar et suiv.