Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 April 2010
The author analyzes the impact of religion in current conflicts throughout the world. The main focus lies on the monotheistic religions, i.e. Judaism, Christianity and Islam, all of which have recently been reproached for potentially fostering the temptation to resort to violence. The article focuses on this accusation and departs from an analysis of the concept of “holy war” in the three religions. The article concludes with setting out a pragmatism of peaceableness highlighting that wars in the twenty-first century can neither be regarded as just, nor holy, nor clean and that absolute pacifism will not only be politically impossible but might as a political principle even be irresponsible.
1 The article by Gerlitz, P., “Krieg I (Religionsgeschichtlich)”, in Theologische Realenzyklopädie, Vol. 20, 1990Google Scholar, de Gruyter, Berlin, gives an overview of the vast number of comparative theological studies on the subject of war.
2 See Ex 20:1–17; Deut 5: 6–21. The biblical quotations are from the Revised Standard Version of the Bible, WM. Collins Sons & Co. Ltd., New York, Glasgow and Toronto.
3 See H. Küng, Judaism, Ch. 1-A II, 5: “The establishment of monotheism.”
4 Girard, R., La violence et le sacré, Paris 1972Google Scholar (in German: Das Heilige und die Gewalt, Zurich, 1987), and Le bouc émissaire, Paris, 1982 (in German Der Sündenbock, Zurich, 1988).
5 Gen. 4.
6 Is. 2:4; Mic. 4:1–3.
7 Deut. 1–3 and the Book of Joshua.
8 For an overview of the various attempts at reconstruction, see H. Küng, Das Judentum, Ch. 1 -C 1,1: “Die Landnahme.”
9 See N. Lohfink, Art. aeraem (Vernichtungsweihe), in Theologisches Wörterbuch zum Alten Testament, Vol. III, Stuttgart, 1982, Col. 192–213; Cit. col. 206.
10 See Soggin, J. A., “Krieg II (Altes Testament)”, in Theologische Realenzyklopädie, Vol. 20, 1990Google Scholar, de Gruyter, Berlin.
11 1 Kings 18–19.
12 Gen. 1: 26–28.
13 Gen. 6:11–13.
14 Gen. 9:6.
15 See Lichtenstein, A., The Seven Laws of Noah, New York 1995.Google Scholar
16 On the importance of the Noahide Laws for a universal code of ethical conduct, see also Kuschel, K.-J., Streit urn Abraham, Düsseldorf, 2002, pp. 224Google Scholar f.
17 M. Luther, The Large Catechism, The First Commandment, 1st para. Translated from the German, Groβer Katechismus, by E Bente and W.H.T. Dau.
18 On holy war/jihad, see Noth, A., Heiliger Krieg und heiliger Kampf im Islam und Christentum, Bonn, 1966Google Scholar; Peters, R., Islam and Colonialism: The Doctrine of Jihad in Modern History, The Hague, 1980CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Watt, W. M., Welch, A. T., Der Islam I: Mohammed und die Frühzeit — Islamisches Recht — Religiöses Leben, Stuttgart, 1980, esp. p. 150 ff.Google Scholar; Bürgel, J. C., Allmacht und Mächtigkeit: Religion und Welt im Islam, Munich, 1991, esp. p. 80Google Scholar f.; Ende, W., Steinbach, U. (eds.), Der Islam in der Gegenwart: Entwicklung und Ausbreitung — Staat, Politik und Recht — Kultur und Religion, Munich, 1996, pp. 279–282.Google Scholar
19 Sura 22:78. The Koran, translated by N.J. Dawood, Penguin Classics, Penguin Books, London, 1990.
20 Sura 61:11.
21 Sura 61:12.
22 Sura 9:73.
23 Sura 9:5.
24 Sura 2:190–193.
25 For instance Ragab, A. el Kalim (lecturing in Bamberg and Cairo), “Die Lehre vom ‘yihåd’ im Islam: Eine kritische Diskussion der Quellen und aktueller Entwicklungen” in Renz, A., Leimgruber, S. (eds.), Lernprozeβ Christen Muslime, Münster, 2002, pp. 57–88.Google Scholar
26 See Peters, R., Jihad in Medieval and Modern Islam, Leiden, 1977Google Scholar, and his article “Jihåd”, in The Oxford Encyclopedia of the Modern Islamic World, Vol. 2, 1995, pp. 369–373.Google Scholar
27 On this whole development, see Bürgel, J. C., “Der Islam und die Menschenrechte” in Kley, R., Möckli, S. (eds.), Geisteswissenschaftliche Dimensionen der Politik: Festschrift für Alois Riklin zum 65. Geburtstag, Bern, 2000, pp. 31–60Google Scholar, in which he refers to the work of Hans Müller, Die Kunst des Sklavenkaufs nach arabischen, persischen und türkischen Ratgebern vom 10. bis zum 18. Jahrhundert, Freiburg/Br., 1980. In his book Attmacht und Mächtigkeit (see note 18 above) Burgel explains various phenomena and processes of Islamic cultural history by placing them in the context of religion's claim to power and the conflict between it and the profane counterforces to be subjugated.
28 Sura 47:4–6.
29 Meddeb, A., La Maladie de l'lslam, Paris, 2002Google Scholar (in German: Die Krankheit des Islam, Heidelberg, 2002, p. 247).
30 Sura 64:14.
31 Sura 41:33–35.
32 Sura 8:61.
33 See Rittberger, V., Hasenclever, A., “Religionen in Konflikten”, in Küng, H., Kuschel, K.-J. (eds.), Wissenschaft und Weltethos, Munich, 2001, pp. 161–200Google Scholar; Hasenclever, A., “Geteilte Werte — Gemeinsamer Frieden? Überlegungen zur zivilisierenden Kraft von Religionen und Glaubensgemeinschaften”, in: Küng, H., Senghaas, D. (eds.), Friedenspolitik: Ethische Grundlagen internationaler Beziehungen, Munich, 2003, pp. 288–318Google Scholar; Gebhardt, G., Zum Frieden bewegen: Die friedenserzieherische Tätigkeit religiöser Friedensbewegungen, Hamburg, 1994.Google Scholar
34 For a detailed exposé, see Kung, H., Weltethos für Weltpolitik und Weltwirtschaft, München 1997Google Scholar, Ch. A V: “Weltfrieden — Herausforderung fur die Weltreligionen.”
35 See Sura 22:38 f.
36 Dunant, Henry, A Memory of Solferino, English version by, and reprinted by courtesy of, the American Red Cross, ICRC, Geneva, 1986, p. 127.Google Scholar