Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T16:05:27.140Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rule and resistance in global governance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 December 2020

Nicole Deitelhoff Open the ORCID record for Nicole Deitelhoff [Opens in a new window]  and
Christopher Daase
Nicole Deitelhoff*
Affiliation:
Peace Research Institute Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Christopher Daase
Affiliation:
Peace Research Institute Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: deitelhoff@hsfk.de
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A Theory of Global Governance is a long awaited book that finally theorizes the increasing authority of international institutions and the conflicts emerging from it. With its focus on reflexive deference as a basis for international authority it covers important elements of global governance but also leaves some critical blind spots regarding the forms of super- and subordination. In our engagement with Michael Zürn's book we propose to conceptualize international authority as a subcategory of international rule instead of its essence and to investigate various forms of rule by way of analyzing the resistance they provoke instead of institutionalized mandates.

Keywords

global governanceinternational authorityinternational ruleresistance
Type
Symposium: Authority, Legitimacy, and Contestation in Global Governance: Edited by Orfeo Fioretos and Jonas Tallberg
Information
International Theory , Volume 13 , Issue 1 , March 2021 , pp. 122 - 130
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderl, Felix. 2018. “Complex Rule in Global Governance. Open Institutions, Fragmented Critique.” Dissertationsschrift, Universität Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Bailey, Jennifer L. 2008. “Arrested Development: The Fight to End Commercial Whaling as a Case of Failed Norm Change.” European Journal of International Relations 14 (2): 289–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, Michael. 2020. “Change In or Of Global Governance?” International Theory 13 (1): 131–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, Michael, and Duvall, Raymond. 2005. “Power in International Politics.” International Organization 59 (1): 39–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daase, Christopher, and Deitelhoff, Nicole. 2019. “Opposition and Dissidence: Two Modes of Resistance against International Rule.” Journal of International Political Theory 15 (1): 11–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1971: Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven, NJ: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Deitelhoff, Nicole, and Zimmermann, Lisbeth. 2020. “Things We Lost in the Fire. How Different Types of Contestation Affect the Validity of Norms.” International Studies Review 22 (1): 51–76.Google Scholar
Donnelly, Jack. 2006. “Sovereign Inequalities and Hierarchy in Anarchy: American Power and International Society.” European Journal of International Relations 12 (2): 139–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donnelly, Jack. 2009. “Rethinking Political Structures: From ‘Ordering Principles’ to ‘Vertical Differentiation’ – and Beyond.” International Theory 1 (1): 49–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guzzini, Stefano. 2005. “The Concept of Power. A Constructivist Analysis.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 33 (3): 495–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurd, Ian. 2008. After Anarchy: Legitimacy and Power in the United Nations Security Council. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John, Mastanduno, Michael, and Wolforth, William C.. 2009. “Introduction: Unipolarity, State Behavior, and Systemic Consequences.” World Politics 61 (1): 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keene, Edward. 2013. “International Hierarchy and the Origins of the Modern Practice of Intervention.” Review of International Studies 39 (5): 1077–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lake, David. 2009. Hierarchy in International Relations. New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Lukes, Steven. 1983. “Macht und Herrschaft bei Weber, Marx, Foucault.” In Verhandlungen des Deutschen Soziologentages: Vorträge und Diskussionen, edited by Deutsche Gesellschaft für Soziologie, Vol. 21, 106–19. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.Google Scholar
Mattern, Janice Bially, and Zarakol, Ayse. 2016. “Theorising Hierarchies in World Politics.” International Organization 70 (3): 623–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Münkler, Herfried. 2007. Imperiale Ordnung. Die Governance-Leistung von Imperien in komparativer Perspektive. Staatszerfall und Governance. Nomos: Baden-Baden.Google Scholar
Niesen, Peter. 2019. “Introduction: Resistance, Disobedience, or Constituent Power? Emerging Narratives of Transnational Protest.” Journal of International Political Theory 15 (1): 2–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Onuf, Nick, and Klink, Frank. 1989. “Anarchy, Authority, Rule.” International Studies Quarterly 33 (2): 149–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, Philip. 2002. Rule, Reason, and Norms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pouliot, Vincent. 2020. “Global Governance in the Age of Epistemic Authority.” International Theory 13 (1): 144–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schakel, Arjan H., Hooghe, Lisbeth, and Marks, Gary. 2015. “Multilevel Governance and the State.” In The Oxford Handbook on Transformations of the State, edited by Leibfried, Stephan, Huber, Evelyn, Lange, Matthew, Levy, Jonah D., and Nullmeier, Frank, 269–85. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Scholte, Jan Art. 2020. “Beyond Institutionalism: Toward a Transformed Global Governance Theory.” International Theory 13 (1): 179–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, Ian. 2016. Politics against Domination. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vagts, Detlev F. 2001. “Hegemonic International Law.” American Journal of International Law 95 (4): 843–48.Google Scholar
Volk, Christian. 2019. “Enacting a Parallel World: Political Protest against the Transnational Constellation.” Journal of International Political Theory 15 (1): 100–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Max. 1978. Economy and Society. An Outline of Interpretive Sociology, ed. and trans. by Guenther Roth and Claus Wittich. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Zarakol, Ayse (ed.). 2017. Hierarchies in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zürn, Michael. 2012. “Autorität und Legitimität in der postnationalen Konstellation.” In Der Aufstieg der Legitimitätspolitik, edited by Geis, Anna, Nullmeier, Frank, and Daase, Christopher, 41–62. Baden-Baden: Nomos.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zürn, Michael. 2018. A Theory of Global Governance. Authority, Legitimacy and Contestation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zürn, Michael, Binder, Martin, and Ecker-Ehrhardt, Matthias. 2012. “International Authority and Its Politicization.” International Theory 4 (1): 69–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zürn, Michael, and Deitelhoff, Nicole. 2015. “Internationalization and the State – Sovereignty as the External Side of Modern Statehood.” In The Oxford Handbook on Transformations of the State, edited by Leibfried, Stephan, Huber, Evelyn, Lange, Matthew, Levy, Jonah D., and Nullmeier, Frank, 193–218. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar