Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T17:06:24.702Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Debatable lands

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2014

David Miller
David Miller*
Affiliation:
Nuffield College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
*
E-mail: david.miller@nuffield.ox.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Original Papers
Information
International Theory , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , March 2014 , pp. 104 - 121
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, Malcolm. 1996. Frontiers: Territory and State Formation in the Modern World. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Arrhenius, Gustav. 2005. “The Boundary Problem in Democratic Theory.” In Democracy Unbound: Basic Explorations 1, edited by Folke Tersman, 14–29. Stockholm: Filosofiska institutionen, Stockholms Universitet.Google Scholar
Arrow, Kenneth. 1967. “Values and Collective Decision-Making.” In Philosophy, Politics and Society, Third Series, edited by Peter Laslett and W.G. Runciman, 215–232. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bose, Sumantra. 2003. Kashmir: Roots of Conflict, Paths to Peace. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
——Bose, Sumantra 2007. Contested Lands: Israel-Palestine, Kashmir, Bosnia, Cyprus and Sri Lanka. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Chandhoke, Neera. 2012. Contested Secessions: Rights, Self-Determination, Democracy, and Kashmir. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gans, Chaim. 2003. The Limits of Nationalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goodin, Robert. 2007. “Enfranchising All Affected Interests, and Its Alternatives.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 35(1):40–68.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. 1991. [1651]. Leviathan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kaul, Ashok. 2011. Kashmir, Contested Identity: Closed Systems, Open Choices. Jaipur: Rawat Publications.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 2004. “Constitutional Design for Divided Societies.” Journal of Democracy 15(2):96–109.Google Scholar
Malik, Iffat. 2002. Kashmir: Ethnic Conflict, International Dispute. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Meisels, Tamar. 2009. Territorial Rights, 2nd ed.Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Miller, David. 1998. “Secession and the Principle of Nationality.” In National Self-Determination and Secession, edited by Margaret Moore, 62–78. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
——Miller, David 2000. “Nationality in Divided Societies.” In Citizenship and National Identity, 125–141. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
——Miller, David 2007. National Responsibility and Global Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
——Miller, David 2009. “Democracy’s Domain.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 37(3):201–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
——Miller, David 2012. “Territorial Rights: Concept and Justification.” Political Studies 60(2):252–268.Google Scholar
Moore, Margaret. 1998. “The Territorial Dimension of Self-Determination.” In National Self-Determination and Secession, edited by Margaret Moore, 134–157. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
——Moore, Margaret 2001. The Ethics of Nationalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Näsström, Sofia. 2011. “The Challenge of the All-Affected Principle.” Political Studies 59(1):116–134.Google Scholar
Neville, Cynthia. 1998. Violence, Custom and Law: The Anglo-Scottish Border Lands in the Later Middle Ages. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
O’Leary, Brendan. 1999. “The Nature of the British-Irish Agreement.” New Left Review 233:66–96.Google Scholar
——O’Leary, Brendan 2005. “Debating Consociational Politics: Normative and Explanatory Arguments.” In From Power Sharing to Democracy: Post-conflict Institutions in Ethnically Divided Societies, edited by Sid Noel, 3–43. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
Prakash, Siddhartha. 2000. “The Political Economy of Kashmir Since 1947.” Contemporary South Asia 9(3):315–337.Google Scholar
Ratner, Steven. 1996. “Drawing a Better Line: Uti Possidetis and the Borders of New States.” American Journal of International Law 90(4):590–624.Google Scholar
Reilly, Benjamin. 2012. “Institutional Designs for Diverse Democracies: Consociationalism, Centripetalism and Communalism Compared.” European Political Science 11(2):259–270.Google Scholar
Stewart, Rory. 2012. “Loyalty of the Borderlands.” Prospect, March:16–17.Google Scholar
Whelan, Frederick. 1983. “Prologue: Democratic Theory and the Boundary Problem.” In Nomos XXV: Liberal Democracy, edited by John Chapman and J. Roland Pennock, 13–47. New York and London: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Zutshi, Chitralekha. 2004. Languages of Belonging: Islam, Regional Identity, and the Making of Kashmir. London: Hurst.Google Scholar