Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T04:51:40.721Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Enforcement and capacity building in international cooperation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2010

Johannes Urpelainen
Johannes Urpelainen*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Columbia University, 420 West 118th Street, 712 IAB, New York, NY 10027, USA
*
* E-mail: ju2178@columbia.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I examine enforcement and capacity building in international cooperation. In a game-theoretic model, a wealthy donor gives foreign aid in exchange for policy implementation by a poor recipient. The recipient has limited capacity to comply with international agreements, so the donor is not sure if cooperation failure is caused by willful disobedience or unintended error. I show that if perceived cooperation failure prompts reciprocal suspension of cooperation, the donor and recipient have a common preference for capacity building. But when the donor can request compensation for perceived cooperation failure, it only chooses to build capacity if cooperation is otherwise impossible. Consequently, the choice of enforcement mechanism shapes capacity building. This result lays a foundation for a genuine synthesis between the enforcement and managerialist schools of compliance. It generates falsifiable hypotheses and explains why reciprocal enforcement, which unfortunately inflicts collateral damage on the victim, is often considered legitimate.

Keywords

international cooperationcomplianceenforcementcapacity buildinggame theory
Type
Original Papers
Information
International Theory , Volume 2 , Issue 1 , March 2010 , pp. 32 - 49
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, K.W.Snidal, D. (1998), ‘Why states act through formal international organizations’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 42(1): 3–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbott, K.W.Snidal, D. (2000), ‘Hard and soft law in international overnance’, International Organization 54(3): 421–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
al-Nasser, N.A. (2004), Submission of the Group of 77, New York, NY: Group of 77.Google Scholar
Alesina, A.Dollar, D. (2000), ‘Who gives foreign aid to whom and why?’, Journal of Economic Growth 5(1): 33–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Axelrod, R. (1984), The Evolution of Cooperation, New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Axelrod, R.Keohane, R.O. (1985), ‘Achieving cooperation under anarchy: strategies and institutions’, World Politics 38(1): 226–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, D.A. (1979), ‘Power analysis and world politics: new trends versus old tendencies’, World Politics 31(2): 161–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, D.A. (1986), Economic Statecraft, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Barnett, M.Duvall, R. (2005), ‘Power in international politics’, International Organization 59(1): 39–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, S. (1994a), ‘The biodiversity supergame’, Environmental and Resource Economics 4(1): 111–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, S. (1994b), ‘Self-enforcing international environmental agreements’, Oxford Economic Papers 46(Suppl): 878–894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, S. (1999), ‘A theory of full international cooperation’, Journal of Theoretical Politics 11(4): 519–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, S. (2007), Why Cooperate? The Incentive to Supply Global Public Goods, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bearce, D.H. (2002), ‘Institutional breakdown and international cooperation: the European agreement to recognize Croatia and Slovenia’, European Journal of International Relations 8(4): 471–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, B.Smith, A. (2009), ‘A political economy of aid’, International Organization 63(2): 309–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnside, C.Dollar, D. (2000), ‘Aid, policies, and growth’, American Economic Review 90(4): 847–868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrubba, C.J. (2005), ‘Courts and compliance in international regulatory regimes’, Journal of Politics 67(3): 669–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrubba, C.J. (2009), ‘A model of the endogenous development of judicial institutions in federal and international systems’, Journal of Politics 71(1): 55–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, T.L. (2007), ‘International security institutions, domestic politics, and institutional legitimacy’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 51(1): 134–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chayes, A.Chayes, A.H. (1995), The New Sovereignty: Compliance with International Regulatory Agreements, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Checkel, J.T. (2001), ‘Why comply? Social learning and European identity change’, International Organization 55(3): 553–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, I. (2003), ‘Legitimacy in a global order’, Review of International Studies 29(1): 75–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clémençon, R. (2006), ‘What future for the Global Environment Facility?’, Journal of Environment and Development 15(1): 50–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conybeare, J.A.C. (1987), Trade Wars: The Theory and Practice of International Commercial Rivalry, New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Dai, X. (2002), ‘Information systems in treaty regimes’, World Politics 54(4): 405–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downs, G.W. (1997), ‘Enforcement and the evolution of cooperation’, Michigan Journal of International Law 19: 319–344.Google Scholar
Downs, G.W. (2000), ‘Constructing effective environmental regimes’, Annual Review of Political Science 3: 25–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downs, G.W.Rocke, D.M. (1995), Optimal Imperfection? Domestic Uncertainty and Institutions in International Relations, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downs, G.W., Rocke, D.M.Barsoon, P.N. (1996), ‘Is the good news about compliance good news about cooperation?’, International Organization 50(3): 379–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easterly, W. (2002), The Elusive Quest for Growth, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Farrell, J.Maskin, E.S. (1989), ‘Renegotiation in repeated games’, Games and Economic Behavior 1(4): 327–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fearon, J.D. (1998), ‘Bargaining, enforcement, and international cooperation’, International Organization 52(2): 269–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finger, J.M.Schuler, P. (2000), ‘Implementation of Uruguay round commitments: the development challenge’, World Economy 23(4): 511–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilligan, M.J. (2004), ‘Is there a broader-deeper trade-off in international multilateral agreements’, International Organization 58(3): 459–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, J., Kahler, M., Keohane, R.O.Slaughter, A.-M. (2000), ‘Introduction: legalization and world politics’, International Organization 54(3): 385–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guzman, A.T.Simmons, B.A. (2005), ‘Power plays and capacity constraints: the selection of defendants in world trade organization disputes’, Journal of Legal Studies 34(2): 557–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, R.L., Parks, B.C., Roberts, J.T.Tierney, M.J. (2008), Greening Aid? Understanding the Environmental Impact of Development Assistance, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurd, I. (1999), ‘Legitimacy and authority in international politics’, International Organization 53(2): 379–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikenberry, G.J. (2000), After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Keck, M.E.Sikkink, K. (1998), Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, R.O. (1984), After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, R.O. (1986), ‘Reciprocity in international relations’, International Organization 40(1): 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keohane, R.O.Levy, M.A. (1996), Institutions for the Earth: Sources of Effective International Environmental Protection, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kolk, A. (1998), ‘From conflict to cooperation: international policies to protect the Brazilian Amazon’, World Development 26(8): 1481–1493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koremenos, B. (2005), ‘Contracting around international uncertainty’, American Political Science Review 99(4): 549–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koremenos, B. (2007), ‘If only half of international agreements have dispute resolution provisions, which half needs explaining?’, Journal of Legal Studies 36(1): 189–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koremenos, B., Lipson, C.Snidal, D. (2001), ‘The rational design of international institutions’, International Organization 55(4): 761–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krasner, S.D. (1991), ‘Global communications and national power: life on the Pareto frontier’, World Politics 43(3): 336–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langlois, C.C.Langlois, J.-P. (2001), ‘Engineering cooperation: a game theoretic analysis of phased international agreements’, American Journal of Political Science 45(3): 599–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lohmann, S. (1997), ‘Linkage politics’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 41(1): 38–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mailath, G.J.Samuelson, L. (2006), Repeated Games and Reputations: Long-run Relationships, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maxwell, S.Riddell, R. (1998), ‘Conditionality or contract: perspectives on partnership for development’, Journal of International Development 10(2): 257–268.3.0.CO;2-S>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGillivray, F.Smith, A. (2000), ‘Trust and cooperation through agent-specific punishments’, International Organization 54(4): 809–824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michalopoulos, C. (1999), ‘The developing countries in the WTO’, World Economy 22(1): 117–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, R.B. (1994), ‘Regime design matters: intentional oil pollution and treaty compliance’, International Organization 48(3): 425–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reus-Smit, C. (2003), ‘Politics and international obligation’, European Journal of International Relations 9(4): 591–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosendorff, B.P. (2005), ‘Stability and rigidity: politics and design of the WTO’s dispute settlement procedure’, American Political Science Review 99(3): 389–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosendorff, B.P.Milner, H.V. (2001), ‘The optimal design of international trade institutions: uncertainty and escape’, International Organization 55(4): 829–857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggie, J.G. (1998), ‘What makes the world hang together? Neo-utilitarianism and the social constructivist challenge’, International Organization 52(4): 855–885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaffer, G. (2005), ‘Can WTO technical assistance and capacity-building serve developing countries?’, Wisconsin International Law Journal 23(4): 643–686.Google Scholar
Smith, A.Bueno de Mesquita, B. (2007), ‘Foreign aid and policy concessions’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 51(2): 251–284.Google Scholar
Snidal, D. (1996), ‘Political economy and international institutions’, International Review of Law and Economics 16(1): 121–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, R.W. (2008), ‘The scope of IMF conditionality’, International Organization 62(4): 589–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streck, C. (2001), ‘The Global Environment Facility: a role model for international governance?’, Global Environmental Politics 1(2): 71–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suchman, M.C. (1995), ‘Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches’, Academy of Management Review 20(3): 571–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suwa-Eisenmann, A.Verdier, T. (2007), ‘Aid and trade’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy 23(3): 481–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svensson, J. (2000), ‘Foreign aid and rent-seeking’, Journal of International Economics 51(2): 437–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svolik, M. (2006), ‘Lies, defection and the pattern of international cooperation’, American Journal of Political Science 50(4): 909–925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tallberg, J. (2002), ‘Paths to compliance: enforcement, management, and the European Union’, International Organization 56(3): 609–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, A. (2006), ‘Coercion through IOs: the Security Council and the logic of information transmission’, International Organization 60(1): 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VanDeveer, S.D.Dabelko, G.D. (2001), ‘It’s capacity, stupid: international assistance and national implementation’, Global Environmental Politics 1(2): 18–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vreeland, J. (2003), The IMF and Economic Development, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, A. (1999), Social Theory of International Politics, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, O.R. (1989), ‘The politics of international regime formation: managing natural resources and the environment’, International Organization 43(3): 349–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, O.R. (1999), Governance in World Affairs, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar