Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T12:44:57.869Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A faulty solution to a False(ly characterized) problem: a comment on Monteiro and Ruby

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 2009

Patrick Thaddeus Jackson
Patrick Thaddeus Jackson*
Affiliation:
School of International Service, American University, Washington, DC, USA
*
E-mail: ptjack@american.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Meeting Report
Information
International Theory , Volume 1 , Issue 3 , November 2009 , pp. 455 - 465
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alker, H.R. (1966), ‘The long road to international relations theory: problems of statistical nonadditivity’, World Politics 18(4): 623–655.Google Scholar
Bernstein, R.J. (1992), The New Constellation: Ethical-Political Horizons of Modernity/Postmodernity, Boston: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bially Mattern, J. (2008), ‘The concept of power and the (un)discipline of international relations’, in C. Reus-Smit and D. Snidal (eds), Oxford Handbook of International Relations, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 691–698.Google Scholar
Brubaker, R. (2006), Ethnicity without Groups, Cambridge, MAHarvard University Press.Google Scholar
Carr, E.H. (2001), The Twenty Years’ Crisis, 1919–1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations, London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Descartes, R. (1993), Discourse on Method and Meditations on First Philosophy, 3rd edn., Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Press.Google Scholar
Feyerabend, P. (1993), Against Method, 3rd edn., London: Verso.Google Scholar
Hellmann, G. (2009), ‘Pragmatism and international relations’, International Studies Review 11(3): 638–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hempel, C. (1965), ‘The theoretician’s dilemma: a study in the logic of theory construction’, in, Aspects of Scientific Explanation and other essays, New York: Free Press, pp. 173–229.Google Scholar
Jackson, P.T. (2008a), ‘Conservative visionaries: social science and political excellence’, JPoX-Journal on Political Excellence. Retrieved 10 July 2009 from http://www.jpox.eu/component/streams/view,content/cid,192/Google Scholar
Jackson, P.T. (2008b), ‘Foregrounding ontology: dualism, monism, and IR theory’, Review of International Studies 34(1): 129–153.Google Scholar
Jackson, P.T. (2009), ‘How to think about civilizations’, in P. Katzenstein (ed.), Civilizations in World Politics, New York: Routledge, pp. 176–200.Google Scholar
Jackson, P.T. (2010), The Conduct of Inquiry in International Relations, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, P.T.Nexon, D.H. (2009), ‘Paradigmatic faults in international relations theory’, International Studies Quarterly (forthcoming).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, W. (1978), The Writings of William James: A Comprehensive Edition J. McDermott (ed.), Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakatos, I. (1978), ‘History of science and its rational reconstructions’, in J. Worrall and G. Currie (eds), The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 102–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakatos, I. (2000), ‘Lectures on scientific method’, in M. Motterlini (ed.), For and Against Method, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 19–109.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. (1984), After Virtue, Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Monteiro, N.P.Ruby, K.G. (2009), ‘IR and the false promise of philosophical foundations’, International Theory 1(1): 15–48.Google Scholar
Polanyi, M. (1974), Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Popper, K. (1979), Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pouliot, V. (2004), ‘The essence of constructivism’, Journal of International Relations and Development 7(3): 319–336.Google Scholar
Schmidt, B.C. (1998), The Political Discourse of Anarchy: A Disciplinary History of International Relations, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, C.A. (1996), Defining Science: A Rhetoric of Demarcation, Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar