Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T02:44:38.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A field day with Fritz: introduction to the Symposium

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 December 2020

Antje Wiener Open the ORCID record for Antje Wiener [Opens in a new window]
Antje Wiener*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Business, Economics and Social Sciences, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany and By-Fellow at Hughes Hall, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
*
Corresponding author. E-mail: antje-wiener@uni-hamburg.de
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Status of Law begins with the suspicion ‘that “law” might have become the problem rather than the solution, and this problem requires further analysis’. Given that law is a social construct, Kratochwil invites us to turn to the sites where this construction takes place. To bring the many constitutions and contestations of law to the fore, he conjures theoretical sparring partners to engage in nine meditations. The genius of this Symposium consists of inviting nine colleagues, each engaging with a different meditation, and inviting a tenth colleague to add this introduction as a way to engage the engagement. By doing practice on practice the Symposium does full justice Kratochwil's move towards looking at the practice ‘in the middle of things’. The resulting field day with Fritz is a piece of intellectual mastery compiled by ‘spirited members of the republic of letters’ that carries the reader along on a journey that reveals and addresses Kratochwil's suspicions about the problem with law. In the end, we know more through sharing the problem and partaking in the joy of addressing it.

Keywords

International LawInternational Relations theoryKratochwilnormspracticespraxis
Type
Symposium: In the Midst of Theory and Practice: Edited by Hannes Peltonen and Knut Traisbach
Information
International Theory , Volume 13 , Issue 3 , November 2021 , pp. 513 - 521
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bueger, Christian. 2021. “Meditating Deformalization: Remarks on ‘Of Experts, Helpers, and Enthusiasts’.” International Theory 13 (3): 546–51.Google Scholar
Christiansen, Thomas, Jorgensen, Knud E., and Wiener, Antje. 1999. “The Social Construction of Europe.” Journal of European Public Policy 6 (4): 528–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erksine, Toni 2013. “Whose Progress, Which Morals? Constructivism, Normative IR Theory and the Limits and Possibilities of Studying Ethics in World Politics”. International Theory 4 (3): 449–68.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha, and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change.” International Organization 52 (4): 887–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Patrick T. 2008. “Foregrounding Ontology: Dualism, Monism, and IR Theory.” Review of International Studies 34 (1): 129–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kessler, Oliver. 2016. “Introduction to the Forum: The Status of Law in World Society.” Millennium 44 (2): 236–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich. 2014. The Status of Law in World Society: Meditations on the Role and Rule of Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich. 2016. “Of Words and Deeds: A Reply to My Critics.” Millennium 44 (2): 278–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurowska, Xymena. 2021. “Politics as Realitätsprinzip in the Debate on Constitutions and Fragmented Orders: Remarks ‘On Constitutions and Fragmented Orders’.” International Theory 13 (3): 538–45.Google Scholar
Lechner, Silvya, and Frost, Mervyn. 2018. Practice Theory and International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, James G., and Olsen, Johan P.. 1989. Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Onuf, Nicholas. 2021. “Bewitching the World: Remarks on ‘Inter-disciplinarity, the Epistemological Ideal of Incontrovertible Foundations, and the Problem of Praxis’.” International Theory 13 (3): 522–9.Google Scholar
Peltonen, Hannes. 2021. “Sense and Sensibility or: Remarks on the ‘Bounds of (Non)Sense’.” International Theory 13 (3): 581–7.Google Scholar
Sikkink, Kathryn. 2021. “Meditating on Rights and Responsibility: Remarks on ‘The Limits and Burdens of Rights’.” International Theory 13 (3): 574–80.Google Scholar
Traisbach, Knut. 2021. “On Concepts, Conceptions, and Conceptors: Remarks ‘On the Concept of Law’.” International Theory 13 (3): 530–7.Google Scholar
Tully, James. 1995. Strange Multiplicity: Constitutionalism in an Age of Diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vilaça, Guilherme Vasconcelos. 2021. “Hope behind the Critique of Grand Narratives of Collective Salvation: Remarks on ‘The Power of Metaphors and Narratives’.” International Theory 13 (3): 552–9.Google Scholar
Welsh, Jennifer M. 2021. “Unsettling Times for Human Rights: Remarks on ‘The Politics of Rights’.” International Theory 13 (3): 567–73.Google Scholar
Westerwinter, Oliver. 2021. “From Meditation to Action – A Research Agenda for Studying Informal Global Rule-Making: Remarks on ‘Cosmopolitanism, Publicity, and the Emergence of a “Global Administrative Law”’.” International Theory 13 (2): 560–6.Google Scholar
Wiener, Antje. 2018. Contestation and Constitution of Norms in Global International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiener, Antje, Lang, Anthony F. Jr., Tully, James, Maduro, Miguel Poiares, and Kumm, Mattias. 2012. “Global Constitutionalism: Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law.” Global Constitutionalism 1 (1): 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar