Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T12:13:20.878Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interactional international law: an introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 June 2011

Jutta Brunnée  and
Stephen J. Toope
Jutta Brunnée*
Affiliation:
Metcalf Chair in Environmental Law, Faculty of Law, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Stephen J. Toope
Affiliation:
President and Vice Chancellor, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
*
E-mail: jutta.brunnee@utoronto.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Symposium on Legitimacy and Legality in International Law: An Interactional Account by Jutta Brunnée and Stephen J. Toope
Information
International Theory , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , 20 June 2011 , pp. 307 - 318
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Metcalf Chair in Environmental Law, Faculty of Law, University of Toronto; and President and Vice-Chancellor, University of British Columbia, respectively.

References

Abbott, Kenneth W., Keohane, Robert O., Moravcsik, Andrew, Slaughter, Anne-Marie, Snidal, Duncan. 2000. “The Concept of Legalization.” International Organization 54:401–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, Emanuel. 2005. Communitarian International Relations: The Epistemic Foundations of International Relations. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bederman, David. 2001. “Constructivism, Positivism, and Empiricism in International Law.” Georgetown Law Journal 89:469–499.Google Scholar
Brunnée, Jutta, Toope, Stephen J.. 2010. Legitimacy and Legality in International Law: An Interactional Account. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chayes, Abram, Handler Chayes, Antonia. 1995. The New Sovereignty: Compliance with International Regulatory Agreements. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chinkin, Christine. 1989. “The Challenge of Soft Law: Development and Change in International Law.” International and Comparative Law Quarterly 38:850–866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupuy, Pierre-Marie. 1991. “Soft Law and the International Law of the Environment.” Michigan Journal of International Law 12:420–435.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha. 2000. “Are Legal Norms Distinctive?” New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 32:699–706.Google Scholar
Fuller, Lon L. 1969a. The Morality of Law, rev. ed. Oxford: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Fuller, Lon L. 1969b. “Human Interaction and the Law.” American Journal of Jurisprudence 14:1, reprinted in Hart (2001), The Principles of Social Order: Selected Essays of Lon L. Fuller, rev. ed., edited by Kenneth I. Winston, 211–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldsmith, Jack L.Posner, Eric A.. 2005. The Limits of International Law. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guzman, Andrew T. 2008. How International Law Works: A Rational Choice Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, H.L.A. 1983. Essays in Jurisprudence and Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henkin, Louis. 1979. How Nations Behave: Law and Foreign Policy, 2d ed. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Higgins, Rosalyn. 1994. Problems and Process: International Law and How We Use It. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hurd, Ian. 2008. “Constructivism.” In Oxford Handbook of International Relations, edited by Christian Reus-Smit, and Duncan Snidal, 298. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J., Keohane, Robert O., Krasner, Stephen D.. 1998. “International Organization and the Study of World Politics.” International Organization 52:645–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingsbury, Benedict. 1998. “The Concept of Compliance as a Function of Competing Conceptions of International Law.” Michigan Journal of International Law 19:345–372.Google Scholar
Kingsbury, Benedict 2002. “Legal Positivism as Normative Politics: International Society, Balance of Power and Lassa Oppenheim's Positive International Law.” European Journal of International Law 13:401–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klabbers, Jan. 1996. “The Redundancy of Soft Law.” Nordic Journal of International Law 65:167–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti. 2005. From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument (Reissue with a new epilogue). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, Colleen. 2005. “Lon Fuller and the Moral Value of the Rule of Law.” Law and Philosophy 24:239–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Postema, Gerald J. 1994. “Implicit Law.” Law and Philosophy 13:361, reprinted in 1999, Rediscovering Fuller: Essays on Implicit Law and Institutional Design, edited by Willem J. Witteveen, and Wibren van der Burg, 255–275. Amsterdam University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, Joseph. 1979. The Authority of Law, Essays on Law and Morality. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reus-Smit, Christian. 2003. “Politics and International Legal Obligation.” European Journal of International Relations 9:591–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scelle, Georges. 1956. “Le Phénomène Juridique de Dédoublement Fonctionnel.” In Rechtsfragen der internationalen Organisation: Festschrift für Hans Wehberg zu seinem 70 Geburtstag, edited by Walter Schätzel, and Hans-Jürgen Schlochauer, 324. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.Google Scholar
Simmons, Beth. 2000. “The Legalization of International Monetary Affairs.” International Organization 54:573–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenger, Etienne. 1998. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar