Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T17:03:41.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Response of Pale Swallow-wort (Vincetoxicum rossicum) to Triclopyr Application and Clipping

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Kristine M. Averill ,
Antonio DiTommaso  and
Scott H. Morris
Kristine M. Averill
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
Antonio DiTommaso*
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
Scott H. Morris
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: ad97@cornell.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Pale swallow-wort is a nonnative vine, invading natural areas across much of the northeastern United States and southeastern Canada. Control of this clump-forming herbaceous perennial has been difficult. We conducted a 2-yr study (2005–2006) in a heavily infested site in Chaumont, NY to assess the response of swallow-wort to triclopyr applied once as a foliar treatment (1.9 kg ae/ha) (2005 only) alone or in combination with clipping 4 wk later, followed by a single clipping in 2006. We also evaluated the response of swallow-wort to one or two clippings during each of the 2 yr. Two yr after treatments began, swallow-wort cover was lower in plots treated with triclopyr (20 ± 5%) compared with plots subjected to clipping-only (56 ± 6%) or unmanaged controls (76 ± 6%). Stem densities were also lower in triclopyr-treated plots (25 ± 5 stems/m2) than in clipping-only (188 ± 9 stems/m2) and control (178 ± 10 stems/m2) plots across three different sample dates. Seedling densities were lower in triclopyr-treated plots (160 ± 50 seedlings/m2) relative to clipping-only (1,120 ± 180 seedlings/m2) and control (960 ± 50 seedlings/m2) plots after the 2005 growing season. The cover of other plant species was negatively correlated with swallow-wort cover and was higher in triclopyr-treated plots (75 ± 3%) than in clipping-only (5 ± 1%) and control (7 ± 4%) plots in 2006. Across both years, swallow-wort in control and clipped plots produced follicles, but not in triclopyr-treated plots. Regardless of clipping frequency, clipping in June or July was not effective in reducing swallow-wort stem density, cover, or follicle production. Although a single application of triclopyr provided considerable suppression of swallow-wort after two growing seasons, application of triclopyr in subsequent years is likely required to achieve long-term control.

Keywords

Triclopyr, butoxyethyl esterPale Swallow-wort, Vincetoxicum rossicum (Kleopow) Barbar., syn. Cynanchum rossicum (Kleopow) BorhidiDog-strangling vineinvasive speciesnatural areasweed control
Type
Research Articles
Information
Invasive Plant Science and Management , Volume 1 , Issue 2 , April 2008 , pp. 196 - 206
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Bastl, M., Kocar, P., Prach, K., and Pysek, P. 1997. The effect of successional age and disturbance on the establishment of alien plants in manmade sites: an experimental approach. Pages 191–201. in Brock, J. H., Wade, M., Pysek, P., and Green, D., editors. Plant Invasions: Studies from North America and Europe. Leiden, The Netherlands Backhuys Publishers.Google Scholar
Beck, K. G. and Sebastian, J. R. 2000. Combining mowing and fall-applied herbicides to control Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense). Weed Technol 14:351–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benner, B. L. 1988. Effects of apex removal and nutrient supplementation on branching and seed production in Thlaspi arvense (Brassicaceae). Am. J. Bot 75:645–651.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bergelson, J. and Crawley, M. J. 1992. Herbivory and Ipomopsis aggregata: the disadvantages of being eaten. Am. Nat 139:870–882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergelson, J., Juenger, T., and Crawley, M. J. 1996. Regrowth following herbivory in Ipomopsis aggregata: compensation but not overcompensation. Am. Nat 148:744–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonanno, S. E. 1999. Jefferson County Alvar Megasite Conservation Plan. Rochester, NY The Nature Conservancy. 22.Google Scholar
Casagrande, R. A. and Dacey, J. E. 2007. Monarch butterfly oviposition on swallow-worts (Vincetoxicum spp.). Environ. Entomol 36:631–636.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christensen, T. 1998. Swallowworts: the ecology and control of Vincetoxicum spp. Wildflower 14:21–25.Google Scholar
Cox, C. 2000. Herbicide factsheet: triclopyr. J. Pesticide Reform 20:4.Google Scholar
DiTommaso, A., Lawlor, F. M., and Darbyshire, S. J. 2005. The biology of invasive alien plants in Canada. 2. Cynanchum rossicum (Kleopow) Borhidi [ = Vincetoxicum rossicum (Kleopow) Barbar.] and Cynanchum louiseae (L.) Kartesz & Gandhi [ = Vincetoxicum nigrum (L.) Moench]. Can. J. Plant Sci 85:243–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiTommaso, A. and Losey, J. E. 2003. Oviposition preference and larval performance of monarch butterflies (Danaus plexippus) on two invasive swallow-wort species. Entomol. Exp. Appl 108:205–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ernst, C. M. and Cappuccino, N. 2005. The effect of an invasive alien vine, Vincetoxicum rossicum (Asclepiadaceae), on arthropod populations in Ontario old fields. Biol. Invasions 7:417–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greipsson, S. and DiTommaso, A. 2006. Invasive non-native plants alter the occurrence of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and benefit from this association. Ecol. Restor 24:236–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harper, J. L. 1977. Population Biology of Plants. London Academic Press. 892.Google Scholar
Hunter, J. H. 1996. Control of Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) with glyphosate applied at the bud vs. rosette stage. Weed Sci 44:934–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladd, D. and Cappuccino, N. 2005. A field study of seed dispersal and seedling performance in the invasive exotic vine Vincetoxicum rossicum . Can. J. Bot 83:1181–1188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawlor, F. M. 2000. Herbicidal treatment of the invasive plant Cynanchum rossicum and experimental post control restoration of infested sites. M.Sc. thesis. Syracuse, NY State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry. 77.Google Scholar
Lawlor, F. M. and Raynal, D. J. 2002. Response of swallow-wort to herbicides. Weed Sci 50:179–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lennartsson, T. J., Nilsson, P., and Tuomi, J. 1998. Induction of overcompensation in the field gentian, Gentianella campestris . Ecology 79:1061–1072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maschinski, J. and Whitham, T. G. 1989. The continuum of plant responses to herbivory: the influence of plant association, nutrient availability, and timing. Am. Nat 134:1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattila, H. R. and Otis, G. W. 2003. A comparison of the host preference of monarch butterflies (Danaus plexippus) for milkweed (Asclepias syriaca) over dog-strangler vine (Vincetoxicum rossicum). Entomol. Exp. Appl 107:193–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKague, C. I. and Cappuccino, N. 2005. Response of pale swallow-wort, Vincetoxicum rossicum, following aboveground tissue loss: implications for the timing of mechanical control. Can. Field Nat 119:525–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mislevy, P., Mullahey, J. J., and Martin, F. G. 1999. Preherbicide mowing and herbicide rate on tropical soda apple (Solanum viarum) control. Weed Technol 13:172–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monteiro, A., Moreira, I., and Sousa, E. 1999. Effect of prior common reed (Phragmites australis) cutting on herbicide efficacy. Hydrobiologia 415:305–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, M. F. 1941. Chemical soil diagnosis by the universal soil testing system. New Haven, CT Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station. 628. Bulletin 450.Google Scholar
Mutikainen, P., Walls, M., and Ojala, A. 1994. Sexual differences in responses to simulated herbivory in Urtica dioica . Oikos 69:397–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naber, A. C. and Aarssen, L. W. 1998. Effects of shoot apex removal and fruit herbivory on branching, biomass and reproduction in Verbascum thapsus (Scrophulariaceae). Am. Midl. Nat 140:42–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickett, S. T. A. 1982. Population patterns through twenty years of oldfield succession. Vegetatio 49:45–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS 2005. JMP User Guide. Version 6. Cary, NC Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 487.Google Scholar
Sheeley, S. 1992. The distribution and life history characteristics of swallow-wort (Vincetoxicum rossicum). M.Sc. thesis. Syracuse, NY State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry. 126.Google Scholar
Sheeley, S. F. and Raynal, D. J. 1996. The distribution and status of Vincetoxicum in eastern North America. Bull. Torr. Bot. Club 123:148–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, L. L., DiTommaso, A., Lehmann, J., and Greipsson, S. 2006. Growth and reproductive potential of the invasive exotic vine Vincetoxicum rossicum in Northern New York State. Can. J. Bot 84:1771–1780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
St. Denis, M. and Cappuccino, N. 2004. Reproductive biology of Vincetoxicum rossicum (Kleo.) Barb. (Asclepiadaceae), an invasive alien in Ontario. J. Torrey Bot. Soc 131:8–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steele, R. G. D. and Torrie, J. H. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A Biometric Approach. 2nd ed. New York McGraw-Hill. 633.Google Scholar
Storer, D. A. 1984. A simple high sample volume ashing procedure for determination of soil organic matter. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal 15:759–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Wilgen, B., Richardson, D., and Higgins, S. 2000. Integrated control of invasive alien plants in terrestrial ecosystems. Pages 118–128. in Preston, G., Brown, G., and van Wyk, E., editors. Best Management Practices for Preventing and Controlling Invasive Alien Species. Symposium Proceedings. Cape Town, South Africa The Working for Water Programme.Google Scholar