Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T17:30:47.722Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Solarization to control downy brome (Bromus tectorum) for small-scale ecological restoration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 April 2019

Matthew R. Orr*
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Department of Integrative Biology, Oregon State University–Cascades, Bend, OR, USA
Ron J. Reuter
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Department of Forest Ecosystems and Society, Oregon State University–Cascades, Bend, OR, USA
Shanti J. Murphy
Affiliation:
Undergraduate Student, Oregon State University–Cascades, Bend, OR, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Matthew R. Orr, OSU–Cascades, 1500 SW Chandler Avenue, Bend, OR 97702. (Email: orrma@oregonstate.edu)

Abstract

Downy brome (Bromus tectorum L.) is a common impediment to ecological restoration, because its seedbank remains viable after repeated treatment with herbicides. Soil solarization has been used in ecological restoration to control seedbanks of invasive plants. Here we test the efficacy of soil solarization to reduce B. tectorum cover and establish native plants at a site in B. tectorum’s core invasive range with a long history of disturbance and infestation. Solarization raised soil temperatures by as much as 13 C and reduced B. tectorum densities by approximately 20-fold. In 30 plots solarized for 0 to 101 d, B. tectorum emerged in inverse abundance to treatment duration. Broadleaf weeds were less abundant than B. tectorum before treatment, and diminished under solarization, but their response to solarization was weaker than B. tectorum’s, and they emerged in greater numbers than B. tectorum 2 to 3 yr after treatment. When seeded after solarization, a native perennial bunchgrass, squirreltail [Elymus elymoides (Raf.) Swezey], did not differ in abundance between solarized and control plots. Solarization may facilitate B. tectorum control on a small scale without jeopardizing the establishment of native plants, but only if treatment durations are long and subsequent management of broadleaf weeds and remnant B. tectorum is planned.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor: Edith Allen, University of California, Riverside

References

Altland, J (2018) Weed Management in Nursery Crops. https://oregonstate.edu/dept/nursery-weeds. Accessed: November 4, 2018Google Scholar
Bainbridge, DA (1990) Soil solarization for restorationists. Ecol Restor 8:9698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balch, JK, Bradley, BA, D’Antonio, CM, Gomez-Dans, J (2013) Introduced annual grass increases regional fire activity across the arid western USA (1980-2009). Global Change Biol 19:173183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonanomi, G, Chiurazzi, M, Caporaso, S, Del Sorbo, G, Moschetti, G, Felice, S (2008) Soil solarization with biodegradable materials and its impact on soil microbial communities. Soil Biol Biochem 40:19891998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Y, Gamliel, A, Stapleton, JJ, Aviad, T (1991) Chemical, physical, and microbial changes related to plant growth in disinfested soils. Pages 103129 in Katan, J, DeVay, JE, eds. Soil Solarization. Boca Raton, FL: CRC PressGoogle Scholar
Clements, DR, Atwood, LB (2012) Protecting ecosystems from underground invasions—seed bank dynamics in a semi-arid shrub-steppe. Pages 393416 in Ali, M, ed. Diversity of Ecosystems. Rijeka, Croatia: InTechGoogle Scholar
Concilio, AL (2013) Effectiveness and cost of downy brome (Bromus tectorum) control at high elevation. Invasive Plant Sci Manag 6:502511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahlquist, RM, Prather, TS, Stapleton, JJ (2007) Time and temperature requirements for weed seed thermal death. Weed Sci 55:619625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davison, JC, Smith, EG (2007) Imazapic provides 2-year control of weedy annuals in a seeded Great Basin fuelbreak. Native Plants J 8:9196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elmore, CL (1991) Use of solarization for weed control. Pages 6172 in Katan, J, DeVay, JE, eds. Soil Solarization. Boca Raton: CRC PressGoogle Scholar
Horowitz, M, Regev, Y, Herzlinger, G (1983) Solarization for weed control. Weed Sci 31:170179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howe, HF, Martinez-Garza, C (2014) Restoration as experiment. Bot Sci 92:459468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulbert, LC (1955) Ecological studies of Bromus tectorum and other annual bromegrasses. Ecol Monogr 25:181213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IBM (2016) IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows v. 24.0. Armonk NY: IBM CorporationGoogle Scholar
Invasive Species Compendium (2015) Descurainia sophia (flixweed). https://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/110230. Accessed: February 23, 2019Google Scholar
James, JJ, Svejcar, TJ, Rinella, MJ (2011) Demographic processes limiting seedling recruitment in arid grassland restoration. J Appl Ecol 48:961969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katan, J, DeVay, JE (1991) Soil solarization: historical perspectives, principles, and uses. Pages 2337 in Katan, J, DeVay, JE, eds. Soil Solarization. Boca Raton, FL: CRC PressGoogle Scholar
Khan, MA, Marwat, KB, Amin, A, Nawaz, A, Khan, R, Khan, H, Shah, HU (2012) Soil solarization: an organic weed-management approach in cauliflower. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 43:18471860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kyser, GB, DiTomaso, JM, Doran, MP, Orloff, SB, Wilson, RG, Lancaster, DL, Lile, DF, Porath, ML (2007) Control of medusahead (Taeniatherum caput-medusae) and other annual grasses with imazapic. Weed Technol 21:6675Google Scholar
Laerd Statistics (2015) Statistical tutorials and software guides. https://statistics.laerd.com. Accessed: November 10, 2018Google Scholar
Lambrecht, SC, D’Amore, A (2010) Solarization for non-native plant control in cool, coastal California. Ecol Restor 28:424426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mack, R, Pyke, D (1983) The demography of Bromus tectorum: variation in time and space. J Ecol 71:6993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marushia, RG, Allen, EB (2011) Control of exotic annual grasses to restore native forbs in abandoned agricultural land. Restor Ecol 19:4554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGlone, CM, Sieg, CH, Kolb, TE (2011) Invasion resistance and persistence: established plants win, even with disturbance and high propagule pressure. Biol Invasions 13:291304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMaster, GS, Wilhelm, WW (1997) Growing degree-days: one equation, two interpretations. Agric For Meteorol 87:291300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, C, Monaco, TA, Rigby, CW (2009) Variable impacts of imazapic rate on downy brome (Bromus tectorum) and seeded species in two rangeland communities. Invasive Plant Sci Manag 2:110119Google Scholar
Morris, C, Morris, LR, Surface, C (2016) Spring glyphosate application for selective control of downy brome (Bromus tectorum L.) on Great Basin rangelands. Weed Technol 30:297302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moyes, AB, Witter, MS, Gamon, JA (2005) Restoration of native perennials in a California annual grassland after prescribed spring burning and solarization. Restor Ecol 13:659666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newton, CH, Nelson, LR, Dewalt, SJ, Mikhailova, EA, Post, CJ, Schlautman, MA, Cox, SK, Bridges, WC, Hall, KC (2008) Solarization for the control of Pueraria montana (kudzu). Weed Res 48:394397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patel, PP, Patel, MM, Patel, DM, Patel, MM, Patel, GN, Bhatt, RK (2009) Soil solarization—an eco-friendly alternative for weed control in groundnut-potato sequence. Res Crops 10:566572Google Scholar
Pfeifer-Meister, L, Roy, BA, Johnson, BR, Krueger, J, Bridgham, SD (2012) Dominance of native grasses leads to community convergence in wetland restoration. Plant Ecol 213:637647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pyke, DA, Shaff, SE, Lindgren, AI, Schupp, EW, Doescher, PS, Chambers, JC, Burnham, JS, Huso, MM (2014) Region-wide ecological responses of arid Wyoming big sagebrush communities to fuel treatments. Rangel Ecol Manag 67:455467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, CB (2001) Restoring resources for an endangered butterfly. J Appl Ecol 38:10071019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sebastian, DJ, Nissen, SJ, Sebastian, JR, Beck, KG (2017) Seed bank depletion: the key to long-term downy brome (Bromus tectorum L.) management. Rangel Ecol Manag 70:477483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheley, R, Mangold, J, Goodwin, K, Marks, J (2008) Revegetation Guidelines for the Great Basin: Considering Invasive Weeds. ARS-168. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service. 60 pGoogle Scholar
Standifer, LC, Wilson, PW, Porche-Sorbet, R (1984) Effects of solarization on soil weed seed populations. Weed Sci 32:569573Google Scholar
United States Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) (2002) Soil Survey of Upper Deschutes River Area, Oregon, including Parts of Deschutes, Jefferson, and Klamath Counties. Washington, D.C.: Natural Resources Conservation ServiceGoogle Scholar
University of California, Agriculture and Natural Resources (2016) How to manage pests: weed gallery—broadleaf gallery. http://ipm.ucanr.edu/PMG/WEEDS/broad_preview.html. Accessed: November 4, 2018Google Scholar
Whitson, TD, Koch, DW (1998) Control of downy brome (Bromus tectorum) with herbicides and perennial grass competition. Weed Technol 12:391396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winch, M (2006) Biography of a Place: Passages Through a Central Oregon Meadow. Bend, OR: Deschutes County Historical SocietyGoogle Scholar
Young, J (2000) Bromus tectorum L. Pages 7680 in Bossard, CC, Randall, JM, Hoshovsky, MC, eds. Invasive Plants of California’s Wildlands. Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
Zouhar, K (2003) Bromus tectorum. In Fire Effects Information System [Online]. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory. http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/plants/graminoid/brotec/all.html. Accessed: May 1, 2013Google Scholar