Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T13:47:01.618Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cogongrass (Imperata cylindrica) Invasion and Eradication: Implications for Soil Nutrient Dynamics in a Longleaf Pine Sandhill Ecosystem

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Donald L. Hagan ,
Shibu Jose ,
Kimberly Bohn  and
Francisco Escobedo
Donald L. Hagan*
Affiliation:
School of Agricultural, Forest, and Environmental Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634
Shibu Jose
Affiliation:
The Center for Agroforestry, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211
Kimberly Bohn
Affiliation:
University of Florida West Florida Research and Education Center, Milton, FL 32583
Francisco Escobedo
Affiliation:
School of Forest Resources and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: dhagan@clemson.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We assessed pre- and posteradication nitrogen and phosphorus dynamics in longleaf pine sandhill stands severely affected by cogongrass. Across a 7-yr posteradication (glyphosate + imazapyr) “recovery chronosequence,” which included untreated cogongrass, uninvaded reference, and treated plots, we analyzed soils for total N, potentially available P (Mehlich-1 [M1]), pH, and organic matter content. We also used resin bags to assess fluxes of plant available N and P in the soil solution. Additionally, we used litterbags to monitor the decomposition and nutrient mineralization patterns of dead rhizome and foliage tissue. Our results indicate similar total N and M1-P contents in both cogongrass-invaded and uninvaded reference plots, with levels of M1-P being lower than in cogongrass plots for 5 yr after eradication. Soil organic matter did not differ between treatments. Resin bag analyses suggest that cogongrass invasion did not affect soil nitrate availability, although a pulse of NO2 + NO3 occurred in the first 3 yr after eradication. No such trends were observed for ammonium. Resin-adsorbed PO4 was lowest 3 yr after eradication, and pH was highest 5 yr after eradication. Our litterbag study showed that approximately 55% of foliar biomass and 23% of rhizome tissue biomass remained 18 mo after herbicide treatment. Substantial N immobilization was observed in rhizomes for the first 12 mo, with slow mineralization occurring thereafter. Rapid P mineralization occurred, with 15.4 and 20.5% of initial P remaining after 18 mo in rhizomes and foliage, respectively. Overall, our findings indicate that cogongrass invasion has little to no effect on soil nutrient cycling processes, although some significant—but ephemeral—alterations develop after eradication.

Keywords

Glyphosateimazapyrcogongrass, Imperata cylindrica (L.) Beauv. IMCYlongleaf pine, Pinus palustris MillDecompositionherbicidesinvasive plantslegacy effectsrestoration
Type
Research
Information
Invasive Plant Science and Management , Volume 6 , Issue 3 , September 2013 , pp. 433 - 443
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Allison, S. D. and Vitousek, P. M. 2004. Rapid nutrient cycling in leaf litter from invasive plants in Hawai'i. Oecologia 141:612–619.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ashton, I. W., Hyatt, L. A., Howe, K. M., Gurevitch, J., and Lerdau, M. T. 2005. Invasive species accelerate decomposition and litter nitrogen loss in a mixed deciduous forest. Ecol. Appl. 15:1263–1272.Google Scholar
Attiwill, P. M. and Adams, M. A. 1993. Tansley review no. 50: Nutrient cycling in forests. New Phytol. 124:561–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakker, J. and Wilson, S. 2001. Competitive abilities of introduced and native grasses. Plant Ecol. 157:119–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binkley, D. 1984. Ion exchange resin bags: factors affecting estimates of nitrogen availability. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 48:1181–1184.Google Scholar
Binkley, D., Aber, J., Pastor, J., and Nadelhoffer, K. 1986. Nitrogen availability in some Wisconsin forests: comparisons of resin bags and on-site incubations. Biol. Fertil. Soils 2:77–82.Google Scholar
Blank, R. R. 2008. Biogeochemistry of plant invasion: a case study with downy brome (Bromus tectorum). Invasive Plant Sci. Manage. 2:226–238.Google Scholar
Brady, N. C. and Weil, R. R. 2002. The Nature and Properties of Soils. 13th ed. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey Pearson.Google Scholar
Bray, S. R. 2005. Interactions between Plants and Soil Microbes in Florida Communities: Implications for Invasion and Ecosystem Ecology. Dissertation. Gainesville, Florida University of Florida.Google Scholar
Callaway, R. M. and Ridenour, W. M. 2004. Novel weapons: invasive success and the evolution of increased competitive ability. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2:436–443.Google Scholar
Certini, G. 2005. Effects of fire on properties of forest soils: a review Oeocolgia 143:Pp. 1–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chapin, F. S., Matson, P. A., and Mooney, H. A. 2002. Terrestrial nutrient cycling. Pages 197–223 in Chapin, F. S., Matson, P. A., and Mooney, H. A., eds. Principles of Terrestrial Ecosystem Ecology. New York Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, N. L. and Peet, R. K. 1984. Convergence during secondary forest succession. J. Ecol. 72:25–36.Google Scholar
Collins, A., Jose, S., Daneshgar, P., and Ramsey, C. L. 2007. Elton's hypothesis revisited: an experimental test using cogongrass. Biol. Invasions 9:433–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, A. R. and Jose, S. 2008. Imperata cylindrica, an exotic invasive grass, changes soil chemical properties of forest ecosystems in the southeastern United States. Pages 237–247 in Kohli, R. K., Jose, S., Singh, H. P., and Batish, D. R., eds. Invasive Plants and Forest Ecosystems. Boca Raton, FL CRC Press.Google Scholar
Corbin, J. D. and D'Antonio, C. M. 2004. Effects of exotic species on soil nitrogen cycling: implications for restoration. Weed Technol. 18:1464–1467.Google Scholar
D'Antonio, C. M. and Vitousek, P. M. 1992. Biological invasions by exotic grasses, the grass/fire cycle, and global change. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 23:63–87.Google Scholar
Daneshgar, P. and Jose, S. 2009. Imperata cylindrica, an invasive alien grass, maintains control over nitrogen availability in an establishing pine forest. Plant Soil 320:209–218.Google Scholar
Davis, M. A., Grime, J. P., and Thompson, K. 2000. Fluctuating resources in plant communities: a general theory of invasibility. J. Ecol. 88:528–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrenfeld, J. G. 2003. Effects of exotic plant invasions on soil nutrient cycling processes. Ecosystems 6:503–523.Google Scholar
Ehrenfeld, J. G., Kourtev, P., and Huang, W. 2001. Changes in soil functions following invasions of exotic understory plants in deciduous forests. Ecol. Appl. 11:1287–1300.Google Scholar
Feller, I. C., McKee, K. L., Whigham, D. F., and O'Neill, J. P. 2003. Nitrogen vs. phosphorus limitation across an ecotonal gradient in a mangrove forest. Biogeochemistry 62:145–175.Google Scholar
Gibson, D. 1986. Spatial and temporal heterogeneity in soil nutrient supply measured using in situ ion-exchange resin bags. Plant Soil 96:445–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, D. 1998. Effects of invasive, non-indigenous plant species on ecosystem processes: lessons from Florida. Ecol. Appl. 8:975–989.Google Scholar
Gremmen, N. J. M., Chown, S. L., and Marshall, D. J. 1998. Impact of the introduced grass Agrostis stolonifera on vegetation and soil fauna communities at Marion Island, sub-Antarctic. Biol. Conserv. 85:223–231.Google Scholar
Grierson, P. F. and Adams, M. A. 2000. Plant species affect acid phosphatase, ergosterol and microbial P in a Jarrah (Eucalyptus marginata Donn ex Sm.) forest in southwestern Australia. Soil Biol. Biochem. 32:1817–1827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagan, D. L., Jose, S., and Lin, C. 2013. Allelopathic exudates of cogongrass (Imperata cylindrica): implications for the performance of native pine savanna plant species in the southeastern US. J. Chem. Ecol. 39:312–322.Google Scholar
Harpole, W. S. and Tilman, D. 2007. Grassland species loss resulting from reduced niche dimension. Nature 446:791–793.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hartman, K. M. and McCarthy, B. C. 2004. Restoration of a forest understory after the removal of an invasive shrub, Amur honeysuckle (Lonicera maackii). Restor. Ecol. 12:154–165.Google Scholar
Hector, A., Schmid, B., Beierkuhnlein, C., Caldeira, M. C., Diemer, M., Dimitrakopoulos, P. G., Finn, J. A., Freitas, H., Giller, P. S., Good, J., Harris, R., Hogberg, P., Huss-Danell, K., Joshi, J., Jumpponen, A., Korner, C., Leadley, P. W., Loreau, M., Minns, A., Mulder, C. P. H., O'Donovan, G., Otway, S. J., Pereira, J. S., Prinz, A., Read, D. J., Scherer-Lorenzen, M., Schulze, E. D., Siamantziouras, A. S. D., Spehn, E. M., Terry, A. C., Troumbis, A. Y., Woodward, F. I., Yachi, S., and Lawton, J. H. 1999. Plant diversity and productivity experiments in European grasslands. Science 286:1123–1127.Google Scholar
Hejda, M., Pyšek, P., and Jarošík, V. 2009. Impact of invasive plants on the species richness, diversity and composition of invaded communities. J. Ecol. 97:393–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hewins, D. and Hyatt, L. 2010. Flexible N uptake and assimilation mechanisms may assist biological invasion by Alliaria petiolata. Biol. Invasions 12:2639–2647.Google Scholar
Holzmueller, E. J. and Jose, S. 2011. Invasion success of cogongrass, an alien C4 perennial grass, in the southeastern United States: exploration of the ecological basis. Biol. Invasions 13:435–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inderjit, , and Dakshini, K.M.M. 1991. Investigations on some aspects of chemical ecology of cogongrass, Imperata cylindrica (L) Beauv. J. Chem. Ecol. 17:343–352.Google Scholar
Jordan, N., Larson, D., and Huerd, S. 2008. Soil modification by invasive plants: effects on native and invasive species of mixed-grass prairies. Biol. Invasions 10:177–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jose, S., Cox, J., Miller, D. L., Shilling, D. G., and Merritt, S. 2002. Alien plant invasions: the story of cogongrass in southeastern forests. J. Forest. 100:41–44.Google Scholar
Koger, C. H. and Bryson, C. T. 2004. Effect of cogongrass (Imperata cylindrica) extracts on germination and seedling growth of selected grass and broadleaf species. Weed Technol. 18:236–242.Google Scholar
Kourtev, P. S., Ehrenfeld, J. G., and Häggblom, M. 2003. Experimental analysis of the effect of exotic and native plant species on the structure and function of soil microbial communities. Soil Biol. Biochem. 35:895–905.Google Scholar
Lambers, H., Raven, J. A., Shaver, G. R., and Smith, S. E. 2008. Plant nutrient-acquisition strategies change with soil age. Trends Ecol. Evol. 23:95–103.Google Scholar
Li, Q., Allen, H. L., and Wilson, C. A. 2003. Nitrogen mineralization dynamics following the establishment of a loblolly pine plantation. Can. J. Forest. Res. 33:364–374.Google Scholar
Lippincott, C. L. 2000. Effects of Imperata cylindrica (L) Beauv (Cogongrass) invasion on fire regime in Florida sandhill (USA). Nat. Area. J. 20:140–149.Google Scholar
MacDonald, G. E. 2004. Cogongrass (Imperata cylindrica)—Biology, ecology, and management. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 23:367–380.Google Scholar
Maron, J. L. and Jeffries, R. L. 2001. Restoring enriched grasslands: effects of mowing on species richness, productivity and nitrogen retention. Ecol. Appl. 11:1088–1100.Google Scholar
Maron, J. L. and Vilà, M. 2001. When do herbivores affect plant invasion? Evidence for the natural enemies and biotic resistance hypotheses. Oikos 95:361–373.Google Scholar
Miller, J. H., Manning, S. T., and Enloe, S. F. 2010. A Management Guide for Invasive Plants in Southern Forests. Ashville, NC U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS–131. 120 p.Google Scholar
Mummey, D. L. and Rillig, M. C. 2006. The invasive plant species Centaurea maculosa alters mycorrhizal fungal communities in the field. Plant Soil 288:81–90.Google Scholar
Mylavarapu, R. S. and Moon, D. L. 2002. UF/IFAS extension soil testing laboratory (ESTL) analytical procedures and training manual. Gainesville, FL University of Florida, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agriculture Science, Soil and Water Science Department Circular 1248.Google Scholar
Ortega, Y. K. and Pearson, D. E. 2010. Effects of picloram application on community dominants vary with initial levels of spotted knapweed (Centaurea stoebe) invasion. Invasive Plant Sci. Manage. 3:70–80.Google Scholar
Perkins, L., Johnson, D., and Nowak, R. 2011. Plant-induced changes in soil nutrient dynamics by native and invasive grass species. Plant Soil 345:365–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raison, R. J. 1979. Modification of the soil environment by vegetation fires, with particular reference to nitrogen transformations: a review. Plant Soil 51:73–108.Google Scholar
Reinhart, K. O. and Callaway, R. M. 2006. Soil biota and invasive plants. New Phytol. 170:445–457.Google Scholar
Renz, M. J. and Blank, R. R. 2004. Influence of perennial pepperweed (Lepidium latifolium) biology and plant–soil relationships on management and restoration. Weed Technol. 18:1359–1363.Google Scholar
Rodgers, V. L., Wolfe, B. E., Werden, L. K., and Finzi, A. C. 2008. The invasive species Alliaria petiolata (garlic mustard) increases soil nutrient availability in northern hardwood–conifer forests. Oecologia 157:459–471.Google Scholar
SAS Institute. 2007. The SAS System for Windows Release 9.20. Cary, NC SAS Institute.Google Scholar
Smethurst, P. J. and Comerford, N. B. 1993. Simulating nutrient uptake by single or competing and contrasting root systems. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 57:1361–1367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spilke, J., Piepho, H. P., and Hu, X. 2005. Analysis of unbalanced data by mixed linear models using the MIXED procedure of the SAS system. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 191:47–54.Google Scholar
Standish, R. J., Williams, P. A., Robertson, A. W., Scott, N. A., and Hedderley, D. I. 2004. Invasion by a perennial herb increases decomposition rate and alters nutrient availability in warm temperate lowland forest remnants. Biol. Invasions 6:71–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thiffault, N., Jobidon, R., De Blois, C., and Munson, A. D. 2000. Washing procedure for mixed-bed ion exchange resin decontamination for in situ nutrient adsorption. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 31:543–546.Google Scholar
Tiessen, H., Cuevas, E., and Chacon, P. 1994. The role of soil organic matter in sustaining soil fertility. Nature 371:783–785.Google Scholar
Tilman, D. 1985. The resource ratio hypothesis of plant succession. Am. Nat. 125:827–852.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1977. Soil Survey of Hernando County, Florida. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.Google Scholar
Vitousek, P. M. and Walker, L. R. 1989. Biological invasion by Myrica faya in Hawaii: plant demography, nitrogen fixation, ecosystem effects. Ecol. Monogr. 59:247–265.Google Scholar
Vitousek, P. M., Walker, L. R., Whiteaker, L. D., and Matson, P. A. 1993. Nutrient limitations to plant growth during primary succession in Hawaii Volcanoes National Park. Biogeochemistry 23:197–215.Google Scholar
Walker, J. L. and Silletti, A. 2006. Restoring the groundcover of longleaf pine ecosystems. Pages 297–333 in Jose, S., Jokela, E., and Miller, D. L., eds. The Longleaf Pine Ecosystem: Ecology, Silviculture, and Restoration. New York Springer Science.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, L. R., Wardle, D. A., Bardgett, R. D., and Clarkson, B. D. 2010. The use of chronosequences in studies of ecological succession and soil development. J. Ecol. 98:725–736.Google Scholar
Weidenhamer, J. D. and Callaway, R. M. 2010. Direct and indirect effects of invasive plants on soil chemistry and ecosystem function. J. Chem. Ecol. 36:59–69.Google Scholar
Wilson, C. A., Mitchell, R. J., Hendricks, J. J., and Boring, L. R. 1999. Patterns and controls of ecosystem function in longleaf pine-wiregrass savannas. II. Nitrogen dynamics. Can. J. Forest. Res. 29:752–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfe, B. E. and Klironomos, J. N. 2005. Breaking new ground: soil communities and exotic plant invasion. BioScience 55:477–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yelenik, S. G., Stock, W. D., and Richardson, D. M. 2004. Ecosystem level impacts of invasive Acacia saligna in the South African Fynbos. Restor. Ecol. 12:44–51.Google Scholar
Zavaleta, E. S., Hobbs, R. J., and Mooney, H. A. 2001. Viewing invasive species removal in a whole-ecosystem context. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16:454–459.Google Scholar