Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T19:43:42.922Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Early detection of Youngia japonica (L.) DC. (Asteraceae) in São Miguel Island, Azores, Portugal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2024

Guilherme Roxo*
Affiliation:
Ph.D Student, CIBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, InBIO Laboratório Associado, Pólo dos Açores, Universidade dos Açores, Campus de Ponta Delgada, Ponta Delgada, Açores, Portugal; BIOPOLIS Program in Genomics, Biodiversity and Land Planning, CIBIO, Campus de Vairão, Vairão, Portugal
Luís Silva
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, CIBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, InBIO Laboratório Associado, Pólo dos Açores, Universidade dos Açores, Campus de Ponta Delgada, Ponta Delgada, Açores, Portugal; BIOPOLIS Program in Genomics, Biodiversity and Land Planning, CIBIO, Campus de Vairão, Vairão, Portugal
Lurdes Borges Silva
Affiliation:
UNESCO Chair–Land within Sea: Biodiversity and Sustainability in Atlantic Islands, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade dos Açores, Campus de Ponta Delgada, Ponta Delgada, Açores, Portugal; Researcher, CIBIO-Azores, Universidade dos Açores, Ponta Delgada, Portugal; CIBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, InBIO Laboratório Associado, Pólo dos Açores, Universidade dos Açores, Campus de Ponta Delgada, Ponta Delgada, Açores, Portugal; BIOPOLIS Program in Genomics, Biodiversity and Land Planning, CIBIO, Campus de Vairão, Vairão, Portugal
Rúben Rego
Affiliation:
Ph.D Student, CIBIO-Azores, Universidade dos Açores, Ponta Delgada, Portugal; CIBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, InBIO Laboratório Associado, Pólo dos Açores, Universidade dos Açores, Campus de Ponta Delgada, Ponta Delgada, Açores, Portugal; BIOPOLIS Program in Genomics, Biodiversity and Land Planning, CIBIO, Campus de Vairão, Vairão, Portugal
Roberto Resendes
Affiliation:
Herbarium Technician, CIBIO-Azores, Universidade dos Açores, Ponta Delgada, Portugal; CIBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, InBIO Laboratório Associado, Pólo dos Açores, Universidade dos Açores, Campus de Ponta Delgada, Ponta Delgada, Açores, Portugal; BIOPOLIS Program in Genomics, Biodiversity and Land Planning, CIBIO, Campus de Vairão, Vairão, Portugal
Mónica Moura
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, CIBIO-Azores, Universidade dos Açores, Ponta Delgada, Portugal; CIBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, InBIO Laboratório Associado, Pólo dos Açores, Universidade dos Açores, Campus de Ponta Delgada, Ponta Delgada, Açores, Portugal; BIOPOLIS Program in Genomics, Biodiversity and Land Planning, CIBIO, Campus de Vairão, Vairão, Portugal
*
Corresponding author: Guilherme Roxo; Email: guilherme.g.roxo@uac.pt
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Youngia japonica (L.) DC. was recently discovered on the Azorean island of São Miguel. This species is a cosmopolitan herb that has been reported to be invasive in several regions of the world. It is unclear when and how this plant arrived in São Miguel, Azores. Nevertheless, we hypothesize that this is an unintentional and recent introduction. The populations are expanding in São Miguel, and action is needed to mitigate potential damage to native ecosystems.

Type
Invasion Alert
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Weed Science Society of America

Introduction

The genus Youngia Cass. (Asteraceae) comprises circa 40 species (POWO 2023; Shi and Kilian Reference Shi, Kilian, Wu, Raven and Hong2011) that are native to warm temperate and tropical eastern Asia (Shi and Kilian Reference Shi, Kilian, Wu, Raven and Hong2011). This genus is closely related to Lapsana L. and Crepis L. phylogenetically and morphologically (Slanis and Perea Reference Slanis and Perea2011). Morphologically, Youngia differs from Crepis by possessing compressed, unequally ribbed achenes, and from Lapsana by the presence of a pappus (Figure 1). Youngia japonica (L.) DC. is the most widely distributed species of the genus. In fact, its native range includes China, India, Japan, Korea, the Malay Peninsula, the Philippines, and Taiwan (Ling and Shih Reference Ling and Shih1997). It has been introduced to five continents: Africa, South and North America, Australia, and Europe (Acevedo-Rodríguez and Strong Reference Acevedo-Rodríguez and Strong2007; Pagad et al. Reference Pagad, Genovesi, Carnevali, Schigel and McGeoch2018; Pyke Reference Pyke2016). Youngia japonica is becoming an invasive weed worldwide, having established itself in parts of Europe, southern Africa, Australia, the Pacific Islands, and the eastern United States (Barker et al. Reference Barker, Barker, Jessop and Vonow2005; Botha Reference Botha2001; Botond and Zoltán Reference Botond and Zoltán2004; Nakamura et al. Reference Nakamura, Chung, Huang, Kono, Kokubugata and Peng2012).

Figure 1. Youngia japonica and details of its (A) leaves and (B) flower heads (capitula). (C) A population near Lagoa das Furnas, São Miguel Island, Azores.

To date, no occurrence existed for this species in the Azores archipelago; the species appears to be expanding its range across São Miguel island, appearing mainly in roadsides, lawns, and highly disturbed natural areas (Figure 2).

Figure 2. Distribution map with the red dots showing the sightings of Youngia japonica across São Miguel Island in the Azores archipelago.

This invasion alert reports the presence of Y. japonica in the Azores archipelago and aims to summarize the current knowledge of the natural history and invasion biology of this species.

Natural History, Taxonomy, and Distribution

Taxonomy

Youngia has a complex and puzzling taxonomy (Yahara Reference Yahara, Iwatsuki, Yamazaki, Boufford and Ohba1995). However, studies from Nakamura et al. (Reference Nakamura, Chung, Huang, Kono, Kokubugata and Peng2012, Reference Nakamura, Kono, Huang, Chung and Peng2013) clarified its taxonomy and proposed the following. First, Youngia japonica subsp. longiflora should be considered a distinct lineage from Y. japonica and thus treated as a separate species (i.e., Youngia longiflora). Moreover, three subspecies of Youngia japonica should be recognized (i.e., Youngia japonica subsp. japonica, Youngia japonica subsp. formosana, and Youngia japonica subsp. monticola). Youngia japonica subsp. japonica differs from the other two subspecies by having brown achenes that are less than 2-mm long. The inflorescence axes differentiate the other two subspecies. Youngia japonica subsp. formosana has densely pubescent inflorescence axes, at least at the base, while Y. japonica subsp. monticola inflorescence axes are glabrous or slightly puberulous at the base. The use of proper names for these ecologically and morphologically distinct subspecies is critical for genus nomenclature and biogeography, as well as invasiveness control activities (Nakamura et al. Reference Nakamura, Kono, Huang, Chung and Peng2013). As a result, we conducted a detailed examination of Azorean plants that possessed achenes less than 2-mm long belonging to Y. japonica subsp. japonica.

Plant Traits

Youngia japonica is an annual or biennial species. According to the Flora of China Editorial Committee (2018), Y. japonica basal leaves are disposed as a rosette and are obovate to oblanceolate, pinnatipartite, or pinnatisect. The leaves and lower parts of the plant are variably pubescent, with weak, simple hairs scattered across the surface. The inflorescence forms a panicle or a corymbose cyme, with slender branches. The capitula are small and are composed of 10 to 20 florets, with phyllaries abaxially glabrous and adaxially appressed pubescent. The achene is light brown to dark reddish or purplish brown, ribbed, and fusiform with an attenuate apex. The pappus is white and has a single whorl of barbed hair.

Distribution Worldwide and in the Azores Archipelago

Youngia japonica is native to China, India, Japan, Korea, the Malay Peninsula, the Philippines, and Taiwan (Ling and Shih Reference Ling and Shih1997). However, its nonnative range includes Africa, North and South America, Australia, Spain (Acevedo-Rodríguez and Strong Reference Acevedo-Rodríguez and Strong2007; Pagad et al. Reference Pagad, Genovesi, Carnevali, Schigel and McGeoch2018; Pyke Reference Pyke2016); several Pacific islands (PIER 2016); and in the Macaronesia biogeographic region, Madeira (Jardim and Menezes de Sequeira Reference Jardim and Menezes de Sequeira2021), Tenerife, and Gran Canaria (Verloove Reference Verloove2017). For the first time, we register the occurrence of Y. japonica in the Azores archipelago. This species has only been observed so far on the island of São Miguel (Figure 2), but it is already widely distributed on the island (Table 1).

Table 1. Observed Youngia japonica populations and their locations, altitudes, habitats, dates of observation, collectors’ names, and herbarium voucher numbers when collected.

Phenology

In its native range, Y. japonica flowering and fruiting periods vary depending on the region. In China, this taxon blooms and bears fruit from February to December (Flora of China Editorial Committee 2018), and in India, from October to April (India Biodiversity Portal 2018). In its nonnative area, this taxon has been seen to flower year-round (Davidse et al. Reference Davidse, Sousa-Sánchez, Knapp, Chiang, UUoa Ulloa and Pruski2018), a trait that has also been observed in the specimens from the island of São Miguel in the Azores archipelago.

Uses

Youngia japonica young leaves are consumed as a vegetable and used in traditional medicine. In terms of edibility, in its native range (i.e., China, India, Japan, Korea, the Malay Peninsula, the Philippines, and Taiwan), Y. japonica was consumed during times of famine, and nowadays is used in salads in North America (Ooi et al. Reference Ooi, Wang, Luk and Ooi2004). It is used in folk medicine to treat colds and sore throats, as a diuretic to promote blood cleansing, and as an herbal treatment for diarrhea (Munira et al. Reference Munira, Kabir, Bulbul, Nesa, Muhit and Haque2018). It is used in external applications to treat boils, mastitis, shingles, and bruises (Ooi et al. Reference Ooi, Wang, Luk and Ooi2004). Additionally, studies have shown that this species has anti-tumor activity and inhibitory potential against respiratory syncytial virus (Ooi et al. Reference Ooi, Wang, Luk and Ooi2004), and it is a source of antioxidants (Kaur et al. Reference Kaur, Puri, Sharma, Khan and Jhamta2019). Youngia japonica has also been shown to be a hyperaccumulator of cadmium (Yu et al. Reference Yu, Peng, Xu, Qin, Gao, Zhu, Zuo, Song and Dong2021), which may be useful for phytoremediation. Finally, it is used as an ornamental in various locations (Loewenstein and Loewenstein Reference Loewenstein, Loewenstein and Laband2005).

Habitat

Youngia japonica is commonly found over a broad range of environmental conditions from coastal areas to mountain ranges and from forest margins to disturbed sites such as wastelands (Peng et al. Reference Peng, Chung and Li1998); in moist and semi-shaded habitats, but it is also found in intact or minimally disturbed natural areas (Rojas-Sandoval Reference Rojas-Sandoval2020).

Dispersal

Youngia japonica is an autogamic species, exhibiting high seed set, even when pollination rates are low (Hauber et al. Reference Hauber, Kuhnell and Miller1989). The seeds are readily dispersed by wind (Peng et al. Reference Peng, Pan, Zhu, Zhou, Gao and Wang2018) and water (Kalaman and Marble Reference Kalaman and Marble2023) and by contamination of soil, crop, and grass seeds (Drake Reference Drake1998; Kalaman and Marble Reference Kalaman and Marble2023). Moreover, Y. japonica seeds have been observed as a contaminant in seed lots of cultivated species (Hauber et al. Reference Hauber, Kuhnell and Miller1989; USDA-NRCS 2018)

Invasive Significance

Plant invasions can result in adverse impacts on agriculture, the environment, and the economy. Weed-related crop yield losses are determined by a variety of factors, including weed emergence time, weed density, weed type, and crop, among others, and if not controlled, can result in a 100% yield loss (Chauhan Reference Chauhan2020). Annually, in the United States, weeds cost US$33 billion in lost crop production (Pimentel et al. Reference Pimentel, Zuniga and Morrison2005). Youngia japonica is a weed of coffee (Coffea arabica L.), sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.), and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) (Dangol Reference Dangol2013; Davidse et al. Reference Davidse, Sousa-Sánchez, Knapp, Chiang, UUoa Ulloa and Pruski2018; McIntyre Reference McIntyre1991; Vibrans Reference Vibrans2018). It may also inhibit the growth of coffee and alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) through allelopathy (Chérigo et al. Reference Chérigo, Lezcano and Martínez-Luis2017; Yin et al. Reference Yin, Li, Wang, Zhang, Yu and Qi2008), leading to yield and economic losses.

Environmentally, nonnative species are recognized as one of the major drivers of global biodiversity loss (Shabani et al. Reference Shabani, Ahmadi, Kumar, Solhjouy-fard, Tehrany, Shabani, Kalantar and Esmaeili2020). In fact, invasive species can have a detrimental impact on the ecosystems they invade, degrading ecosystem services and causing severe damage to economies and social livelihoods (Sudmeier-Rieux and Ash Reference Sudmeier-Rieux and Ash2009). Youngia japonica invades both disturbed and undisturbed natural areas. Across the United States, this species has been described as “very common” and is spreading rapidly, invading intact or minimally disturbed forests, prairies, and coastal plains (Swearingen and Bargeron Reference Swearingen and Bargeron2016). It grows well in response to human disturbance and is very common in areas such as roadsides, cultivated fields, lawns, pastures, and forest margins (Loewenstein and Loewenstein Reference Loewenstein, Loewenstein and Laband2005; PIER 2016; Swearingen and Bargeron Reference Swearingen and Bargeron2016; USDA-NRCS 2018; Weakley Reference Weakley2015). More importantly, it has been reported growing in Haleakala National Park in Hawaii, in nearly intact wet forests (Wagner et al. Reference Wagner, Herbst, Sohmer and Bernice1999). Youngia japonica was assessed by the Hawaii-Pacific Weed Risk Assessment (HPWRA) system as a high-risk species (score 14); thus, it is highly invasive in Hawaii and other tropical Pacific islands (HPWRA 2019). Moreover, it is mentioned on several lists of invasive species that support policy makers in the management of invasive species around the world (i.e., Invasive Species Compendium Datasheet and Database of Plants Invading Natural Areas in the United States, https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/10.1079/cabicompendium.117921).

Several activities, such as clearing native vegetation for cereal crops and the introduction of numerous crops and forage, forest, ornamental, and hedgerow plant species, have had a significant impact on native vegetation since human settlement in the Azores (Silva and Smith Reference Silva and Smith2004). In addition to this, the recent intensification of pasture production and cattle grazing in the Azores has lead to eutrophication of soils (Pinheiro et al. Reference Pinheiro, Matos, Simões, Madruga, Arnalds, Óskarsson, Bartoli, Buurman, Stoops and García-Rodeja2007). In fact, a study conducted by Kurz et al. (Reference Kurz, O’Reilly and Tunney2006) shed light on the shift in nutrient concentration caused by cattle and discovered an increase in particulate N, organic P, and K concentrations. Studies on plant invasions have provided evidence that invasive species abundance is positively correlated with proximity to disturbed areas (González-Moreno et al. Reference González-Moreno, Diez, Richardson and Vilà2015) and the amount of N in the soil (Nackley et al. Reference Nackley, Hough-Snee and Kim2017; Stohlgren et al. Reference Stohlgren, Binkley, Chong, Kalkhan, Schell, Bull, Otsuki, Newman, Bashkin and Son1999). Based on the abovementioned research, the Azores provide an ideal habitat for invasive species such as Y. japonica.

It is unknown how and when this plant arrived in São Miguel, Azores. Species checklists attempt to reflect locations’ species diversity. The most recent Azorean checklist was published in 2010 (Silva et al. Reference Silva, Moura, Schaefer, Rumsey, Dias, Borges, Costa, Cunha, Gabriel, Gonçalves, Martins, Melo, Parente, Raposeiro, Rodrigues, Santos, Silva, Vieira and Vieira2010), and the online databases that are constantly updated, such as Portal da Biodiversidade dos Açores (2022) and eAZFlora (https://eazflora.org), do not have Y. japonica listed. Regarding its introduction pathway, according to the literature, a possible pathway is that it came as a contaminant in the seed lots of cultivated species (USDA-NRCS 2018). Based on its dominance on urban lawns and its presence in horticultural and agricultural fields, we hypothesize that Y. japonica was introduced recently as a contaminant in seed lots and that its occurrence in highly disturbed natural areas represents the start of an ongoing expansion that could reach intact forests, as the plant did in Hawaii.

No specific impacts of Y. japonica have been identified. However, given its propagation capacity, environmental versatility, allelopathic behavior, and recognized ecological risk by the HPWRA system, Y. japonica is a high-risk species for the Azores region, and monitoring must be undertaken in the vicinity of sites where it is known to occur (Figure 2). Youngia japonica control is even more crucial than ever. Recently, the Delta Cafés, the Azores Government, and the Association of Azorean Coffee Producers partnered in motivating growers to plant and produce coffee in the Azores. They provided financial support and encouragement to extant coffee producers for the expansion of their plantations and extended this support to new producers, promoting the cultivation of coffee in the Azores. This resulted in an unique and limited batch with 100% Azorean coffee that was commercialized by Delta Cafés (https://www.deltacafes.pt) and was referred to as “the impossible coffee,” because Europe’s climate did not provide the ideal conditions for the production of coffee.

Hence, the early detection of newly introduced species (particularly those with invasive behavior) is critical not only for minimizing potential damage to native populations and the ecosystem, but also, if Y. japonica colonizes coffee plantations, protecting the yield of the newest Azorean coffee, which is produced in small quantities. Therefore, because eradication is still feasible, we recommend the monitoring of and quick interventions for the rapidly spreading populations of Y. japonica in the Azores.

Control

When the plants are young, they can easily be pulled out. However, both above- and belowground plant parts must be removed. Mowing is ineffective, because this herbaceous plant will regrow quickly if root structures remain (USDA-NRCS 2018). It is critical for mechanical management of the plant to remove it before it matures and becomes deeply rooted. Moreover, the removal of plants should be performed before seed set, and care must be taken not to spread seeds to adjacent areas.

Mulching can help prevent any seeds in the soil from germinating or from falling into the soil. Natural mulches should be applied at least 5-cm (2-inches) deep to non-turf areas such as planting beds and foot paths for the best results (Unruh et al. Reference Unruh, Trenholm, Harlow and Leon2020).

Chemical control is only recommended for highly invaded locations where mechanical control is no longer possible. According to Neal and Derr (Reference Neal and Derr2005), preemergence herbicides such as flumioxazin and tank mixes of oxyfluorfen and pendimethalin may control Y. japonica. Preemergence herbicides must be applied before weed emergence and incorporated after application to be effective. Most preemergence herbicides are generally effective for 6 to 12 wk and should be reapplied 6 to 9 wk later for optimum control (Unruh et al. Reference Unruh, Trenholm, Harlow and Leon2020). Regarding postemergence treatment, pelargonic acid and broad-spectrum or nonselective herbicides such as glyphosate, glufosinate, and diquat are recommended (Kalaman and Marble Reference Kalaman and Marble2023). However, caution should be exercised, because this species has shown resistance to herbicides such as diquat and paraquat (Hanoika Reference Hanoika1987; Watanabe Reference Watanabe1990).

Acknowledgments

The study was co-financed by FEDER (85%) and regional funds (15%), through the Azores 2020 Operational Programme, in the context of project eAZFlora (ACORES-01-0145-FEDER-000007). No competing interests have been declared.

Footnotes

Associate Editor: Stephen F. Enloe, University of Florida

References

Acevedo-Rodríguez, P, Strong, MT (2007) Catalogue of the Seed Plants of the West Indies. http://botany.si.edu/antilles/WestIndies/catalog.html. Accessed: February 27, 2023Google Scholar
Barker, WR, Barker, RM, Jessop, JP, Vonow, HP (2005) Census of South Australian Vascular Plants. 5th ed. (Journal of the Adelaide Botanic Gardens, Suppl. 1). Adelaide, Australia: Botanic Gardens of Adelaide and State Herbarium. 382 pGoogle Scholar
Botha, C (2001) Common Weeds of Crops and Gardens in Southern Africa. Pretoria, South Africa: ARC-Grain Crops Institute. 384 pGoogle Scholar
Botond, M, Zoltán, BD (eds) (2004) Biologiai Invaziok Magyarorszagon: Ozonnovenyek [Biological Invasions in Hungary: Invasive Plants]. Budapest, Hungary: Természet BUVAR Alapítvány Kiadó. 366 pGoogle Scholar
Chauhan, BS (2020) Grand challenges in weed management. Front Agron 1:3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chérigo, L, Lezcano, J, Martínez-Luis, S (2017) Diversity and allelopathic potential of weeds among Panamanian coffee crops. Online J Biol Sci 17:232239 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dangol, DR (2013) Weeds of wheat in Nepal: a literature review. J Nat Hist Mus 17(27):132178 Google Scholar
Davidse, G, Sousa-Sánchez, M, Knapp, S, Chiang, F, UUoa Ulloa, C, Pruski, JF, eds (2018) Flora Mesoamericana. Volumen 5, Parte 2, Asteraceae. St Louis: Missouri Botanical Garden Press. 608 pGoogle Scholar
Drake, DR (1998) Relationships among the seed rain, seed bank and vegetation of a Hawaiian forest. J Veg Sci 9:103112 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flora of China Editorial Committee (2018) Flora of China. St Louis: Missouri Botanical Garden; Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Herbaria. http://www.efloras.org/flora_page.aspx?flora_id=2 Accessed: February 27, 2023Google Scholar
González-Moreno, P, Diez, JM, Richardson, DM, Vilà, M (2015) Beyond climate: disturbance niche shifts in invasive species. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 24:360370 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanoika, YA (1987) Paraquat resistance in Erigeron sumatrensis Retz. and Youngia japonica DC. Weed Res (Japan) 32:137140 Google Scholar
Hauber, DP, Kuhnell, RJ, Miller, MK (1989) Evidence for predominant autogamy in Youngia japonica (Asteraceae). Southwest Nat 34:557559 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[HPWRA] Hawaii-Pacific Weed Risk Assessment (2019) Youngia japonica. https://plantpono.org/. Accessed: May 22, 2023Google Scholar
India Biodiversity Portal (2018) Home page. http://indiabiodiversity.org/species/list. Accessed: May 22, 2023Google Scholar
Jardim, R, Menezes de Sequeira, M (2021) New taxa to the flora of Madeira archipelago islands (Portugal). Bot Complut 45:e78245 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalaman, H, Marble, C (2023) Biology and Management of Asiatic False Hawksbeard (Youngia japonica) in Florida Ornamental Production and Landscapes. EDIS, 2023(4). https://journals.flvc.org/edis/article/view/132916 Google Scholar
Kaur, H, Puri, R, Sharma, ML, Khan, S, Jhamta, R (2019) Evaluation of antioxidant activity and GC-MS analysis of bioactive compounds present in leaf extract of Youngia japonica (L.) DC. from Chandigarh. Int J Life Sci Res 7:304311 Google Scholar
Kurz, I, O’Reilly, CD, Tunney, H (2006) Impact of cattle on soil physical properties and nutrient concentrations in overland flow from pasture in Ireland. Agric Ecosyst Environ 113:378390 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ling, Y, Shih, C (1997) Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae. Volume 80. Beijing: Science Press. 500 pGoogle Scholar
Loewenstein, NJ, Loewenstein, EF (2005) Non-native plants in the understory of riparian forests across a land use gradient in the Southeast U.S. Pages 96100 in Laband, DN, ed. Emerging Issues along Urban/Rural Interfaces: Linking Science and Society. Auburn, GA: Auburn University Google Scholar
McIntyre, G (1991) Weeds of Sugarcane in Mauritius: Their Description and Control. Rèduit, Mauritius: Mauritius Sugar Cane Research Institute. 151 pGoogle Scholar
Munira, MS, Kabir, MH, Bulbul, IJ, Nesa, ML, Muhit, MA, Haque, I (2018) Pharmacological activities of Youngia japonica extracts. Annu Res Rev Biol 25:114 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nackley, L, Hough-Snee, N, Kim, S (2017) Competitive traits of the invasive grass Arundo donax are enhanced by carbon dioxide and nitrogen enrichment. Weed Res 57:6771 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakamura, K, Chung, KF, Huang, CJ, Kono, Y, Kokubugata, G, Peng, CI (2012) Extreme habitats that emerged in the Pleistocene triggered divergence of weedy Youngia (Asteraceae) in Taiwan. Mol Phylogenet Evol 63:486499 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nakamura, K, Kono, Y, Huang, C Jr, Chung, KF, Peng, CI (2013) Correction of confusions regarding the identity and synonymy of Youngia (Asteraceae: Tribe Cichorieae) in Taiwan. Syst Bot 38:507516 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neal, JC, Derr, JF (2005) Weeds of Container Nurseries in the United States. Raleigh: NorthCarolia Association of Nurserymen. http://content.ces.ncsu.edu/static/publication/js/pdf_js/web/viewer.html?slug=weeds-of-container-nurseries-in-the-us Google Scholar
Ooi, LS., Wang, H, Luk, CW, Ooi, VE (2004) Anticancer and antiviral activities of Youngia japonica (L.) DC (Asteraceae, Compositae). J Ethnopharmacol 94:117122 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pagad, S, Genovesi, P, Carnevali, L, Schigel, D, McGeoch, MA (2018) Introducing the Global Register of Introduced and Invasive Species. Sci Data 5:112 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peng, CI, Chung, KF, Li, HL (1998) Compositae. Pages 8071101 in Editorial Committee of the Flora of Taiwan, eds. Flora of Taiwan. Volume 4. 2nd ed. Taipei: Editorial Committee of the Flora of Taiwan Google Scholar
Peng, X, Pan, Y, Zhu, X, Zhou, X, Gao, J, Wang, C (2018) Morphological characters and wind dispersal property of pappose seeds for seven common Compositae weeds in Yunnan, China. J Yunnan Univ Nat Sci 40:10241033 Google Scholar
Pimentel, D, Zuniga, R, Morrison, D (2005). Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecol Econ 52:273288 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinheiro, J, Matos, L, Simões, V, Madruga, J (2007) Eutrophication in the Azores Islands. Pages 611621 in Arnalds, Ó, Óskarsson, H, Bartoli, F, Buurman, P, Stoops, G, García-Rodeja, E, eds. Soils of Volcanic Regions in Europe. Berlin: Springer CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[PIER] Pacific Islands Ecosystems at Risk (2016) Plant threats to Pacific ecosystems. HEAR, University of Hawaii. http://www.hear.org/pier/ Google Scholar
[POWO] Plants of the World Online (2023) Home page. Facilitated by the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. http://www.plantsoftheworldonline.org. Accessed: February 27, 2023Google Scholar
Portal da Biodiversidade dos Açores (2023) Portal da Biodiversidade dos Açores. https://azoresbioportal.uac.pt. Accessed October 9, 2023Google Scholar
Pyke, S (2016) Youngia japonica (L.) DC. (Compositae), recently detected in Barcelona. Collect Bot 35:e005e005 Google Scholar
Rojas-Sandoval, J (2020) Youngia japonica (oriental false hawksbeard). Invasive Species Compendium CABI. https://doi.org/10.1079/cabicompendium.117921. Accessed: May 24, 2023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shabani, F, Ahmadi, M, Kumar, L, Solhjouy-fard, S, Tehrany, MS, Shabani, F, Kalantar, B, Esmaeili, A (2020) Invasive weed species’ threats to global biodiversity: future scenarios of changes in the number of invasive species in a changing climate. Ecol Indic 116:106436 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shi, Z, Kilian, N (2011) Youngia Cassini. Pages 252263 in Wu, ZY, Raven, PH, Hong, DY, eds. Flora of China. Volumes 20–21. Beijing: Science Press; St Louis: Missouri Botanical Garden PressGoogle Scholar
Silva, L, Moura, M, Schaefer, H, Rumsey, F, Dias, EF (2010) List of vascular plants (Tracheobionta). Pages 117146 in Borges, PAV, Costa, A, Cunha, R, Gabriel, R, Gonçalves, V, Martins, AF, Melo, I, Parente, M, Raposeiro, P, Rodrigues, P, Santos, RS, Silva, L, Vieira, P, Vieira, V, eds. A List of the Terrestrial and Marine Biota from the Azores. Cascais, Portugal: Princípia Google Scholar
Silva, L, Smith, CW (2004) A characterization of the non-indigenous flora of the Azores Archipelago. Biol Invasions 6:193204 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slanis, AC, Perea, MC (2011) Youngia japonica (Asteraceae, Lactuceae), una novedad para la flora adventicia de Argentina. Bol Soc Argent Bot 46:139143 Google Scholar
Stohlgren, TJ, Binkley, D, Chong, GW, Kalkhan, MA, Schell, LD, Bull, KA, Otsuki, O, Newman, G, Bashkin, M, Son, Y (1999) Exotic plant species invade hot spots of native plant diversity. Ecol Monogr 69:2546 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sudmeier-Rieux, K, Ash, N (2009) Environmental Guidance Note for Disaster Risk Reduction: Healthy Ecosystems for Human Security. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN. 40 pGoogle Scholar
Swearingen, J, Bargeron, C (2016) Invasive Plant Atlas of the United States. University of Georgia Center for Invasive Species and Ecosystem Health. http://www.invasiveplantatlas.org. Accessed: May 24, 2023Google Scholar
Unruh, JB, Trenholm, L, Harlow, E, Leon, RG (2020) Weed Management Guide for Florida Lawns. ENH884/EP141, rev. 9/2020. EDIS, 2020(5)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[USDA-NRCS] U.S. Department of Agriculture–Natural Resources Conservation Service (2018) The PLANTS Database. Greensboro, NC: National Plant Data Team. https://plants.sc.egov.usda.gov. Accessed: May 24, 2023Google Scholar
Verloove, F (2017) New xenophytes from the Canary Islands (Gran Canaria and Tenerife; Spain). Acta Bot Croat 76:120131 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vibrans, H (2018) Weeds of Mexico. (Malezas de México.) In: Malezas de México. http://www.conabio.gob.mx/malezasdemexico/2inicio/home-malezas-mexico.htm. Accessed: November 27, 2023Google Scholar
Wagner, WL, Herbst, DR, Sohmer, SH (1999) Manual of the Flowering Plants of Hawaii. Rev ed. Bernice, P. Bishop Museum Special Publication. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai‘i Press/Bishop Museum Press. 1919 pGoogle Scholar
Watanabe, Y (1990) Discovery, development and distribution of paraquat-resistant biotype weeds in Japan. Korean J Weed Sci 10:163170 Google Scholar
Weakley, AS (2015) Flora of the Southern And Mid-Atlantic States. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Herbarium, North Carolina Botanical Garden. http://www.herbarium.unc.edu/flora.htm. Accessed: February 27, 2023Google Scholar
Yahara, T (1995) Ixeris cass. Pages 1519 in vol. 3b, Iwatsuki, K, Yamazaki, T, Boufford, DE, Ohba, H, eds. Flora of Japan. Tokyo: Kodansha Google Scholar
Yin, YL, Li, HX, Wang, J, Zhang, DS, Yu, YX, Qi, ZQ (2008) The allelopathy of 3 companion weeds with alfalfa. Grass Sci 12:131135 Google Scholar
Yu, B, Peng, Y, Xu, J, Qin, D, Gao, T, Zhu, H, Zuo, S, Song, H, Dong, J (2021) Phytoremediation potential of Youngia japonica (L.) DC: a newly discovered cadmium hyperaccumulator. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:60446057 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Figure 1. Youngia japonica and details of its (A) leaves and (B) flower heads (capitula). (C) A population near Lagoa das Furnas, São Miguel Island, Azores.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Distribution map with the red dots showing the sightings of Youngia japonica across São Miguel Island in the Azores archipelago.

Figure 2

Table 1. Observed Youngia japonica populations and their locations, altitudes, habitats, dates of observation, collectors’ names, and herbarium voucher numbers when collected.