Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:51:36.592Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Herbicide and Fire Effects on Smooth Brome (Bromus inermis) and Kentucky Bluegrass (Poa pratensis) in Invaded Prairie Remnants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Matt A. Bahm ,
Thomas G. Barnes  and
Kent C. Jensen
Matt A. Bahm*
Affiliation:
Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 57007
Thomas G. Barnes
Affiliation:
Department of Forestry, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546
Kent C. Jensen
Affiliation:
Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 57007
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: bahm.matt@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Smooth brome and Kentucky bluegrass are introduced cool-season perennial grasses known to invade grasslands throughout North America. During the fall of 2005 and spring of 2006, we implemented a restoration study at six native prairie sites in eastern South Dakota that have been invaded by smooth brome and Kentucky bluegrass. Treatments included five herbicide combinations, a fall prescribed burn, and an untreated control to determine the potential of each for renovation of invaded native grasslands. Herbicide treatments tested were sulfosulfuron, imazapyr, imazapic + sulfosulfuron, and imazapyr + imazapic, and were applied in late September 2005 and mid-May 2006. Untreated control plots averaged 64% (± 3.1) smooth brome cover and 38% (± 5.5) Kentucky bluegrass cover after the third growing season. Smooth brome cover in herbicide treated plots ranged from 6 to 23% and Kentucky bluegrass cover ranged from 15 to 35% after the third growing season. Smooth brome cover was 20% (± 2.9) and Kentucky bluegrass cover was 19% (± 4.0) in burned plots after the third growing season. Spring and fall treatments had similar native plant cover after three growing seasons. Spring and fall application of 0.33 kg ai ha−1 imazapyr and 0.10 kg ai ha−1 imazapic + 0.16 kg ai ha−1 imazapyr had ≤ 10% smooth brome cover and increased native species cover after three growing seasons. Herbicides were effective at reducing cover of smooth brome and Kentucky bluegrass, and can be incorporated with other management strategies to restore prairie remnants.

Keywords

imazapic, (±)-2-[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo-1H-imidazol-2-yl]-5-methyl-3-pyridinecarboxylic acidimazapyr, (±)-2-[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo-1H-imidazol-2-yl]-3-pyridinecarboxylic acidsulfosulfuron, (±)-1-(4,6-dimethoxypyrimidin-2-yl)-3-[(2-ethanesulfonyl-imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine-3-yl)sulfonylureaKentucky bluegrass, Poa pratensis L. POAPR. smooth brome, Bromus inermis Leyss. BROINInvasive plantspostemergence herbicidesperennial grassrestorationnative prairie
Type
Research
Information
Invasive Plant Science and Management , Volume 4 , Issue 2 , April 2011 , pp. 189 - 197
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Adkins, J. 2007. Efficacy of Herbicides to Restore Understory Cool Season Grassland Communities in Central Kentucky. M.S. thesis. Lexington, KY University of Kentucky. 95 p.Google Scholar
Anderson, B. 1994. Converting smooth brome pasture to warm-season grass. Pages. 157–160. in Proceedings of the 13th North American Prairie Conference. Windsor, ON. Ontario Department of Parks and Recreation.Google Scholar
Anderson, K. L. 1965. Time of burning as it affects soil moisture in an ordinary upland bluestem prairie in the Flint Hills. J. Range Manag 18:311–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bahm, M. A. 2009. Conversion of Exotic Cool-Season Grasslands to Restored Native Plant Communities Utilizing Herbicide Treatments. Ph.D Dissertation. Brookings, SD South Dakota State University. 200 p.Google Scholar
Barnes, T. G. 2007. Using herbicides to rehabilitate native grasslands. Nat. Areas J 27:56–65.Google Scholar
Beran, D. D., Gaussoin, R. E., and Masters, R. A. 1999a. Native wildflower establishment with imidazolinone herbicides. HortScience 34:283–286.Google Scholar
Beran, D. D., Gaussoin, R. E., and Masters, R. A. 1999b. Grassland legume establishment with imazethapyr and imazapic. Agron. J 91:592–596.Google Scholar
Beran, D. D., Masters, R. A., Gaussoin, R. E., and Rivas-Pantoja, F. 2000. Establishment of big bluestem and Illinois bundleflower mixtures with imazapic and imazethapyr. Agron. J 92:460–465.Google Scholar
Blankespoor, G. W. 1987. The effects of prescribed burning on a tallgrass prairie remnant in eastern South Dakota. Prairie Nat 19:177–188.Google Scholar
Blankespoor, G. W. and Larson, E. A. 1994. Response of smooth brome (Bromus inermis Leyss.) to burning under varying soil moisture conditions. Am. Midl. Nat 131:266–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonham, C. D. 1989. Measurements for Terrestrial Vegetation. New York John Wiley and Sons. 338 p.Google Scholar
Curtis, J. T. and Partch, M. L. 1948. Effect of fire on the competition between blue grass and certain prairie plants. Am. Midl. Nat 39:437–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dill, T. O., Waller, S. S., Vogel, K. P., Gates, R. N., and Stroup, W. W. 1986. Renovation of seeded warm-season pastures with atrazine. J. Range Manag 39:72–75.Google Scholar
DiTomaso, J. M., Drewitz, J. J., and Kyser, G. B. 2008. Jubatagrass (Cortaderia jubata) control using chemical and mechanical methods. Invasive Plant Sci. Manag 1:82–90.Google Scholar
Ehrenfeld, J. G. 2003. Effects of exotic plant invasions on soil nutrient cycling processes. Ecosystems 6:503–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrenreich, J. G. 1959. Effect of burning and clipping on growth of native prairie in Iowa. J. Range Manag 12:133–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuhlendorf, S. D., Engle, D. M., Arnold, D. C., and Bidwell, T. G. 2002. Influence of herbicide application on forb and arthropod communities of North American tallgrass prairies. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ 92:251–259.Google Scholar
Grant, T. A., Flanders-Wanner, B., Shaffer, T. L., Murphy, R. K., and Knutsen, G. A. 2009. An emerging crisis across northern prairie refuges: prevalence of invasive plants and a plan for adaptive management. Ecol. Restor 27:58–65.Google Scholar
Grilz, P. L. and Romo, J. T. 1994. Water relations and growth of Bromus inermis Leyss (smooth brome) following spring or autumn burning in a fescue prairie. Am. Midl. Nat 132:340–348.Google Scholar
Guertin, D. S., Easterling, W. E., and Brandle, J. R. 1997. Climate change and forests in the Great Plains. Bioscience 47:287–295.Google Scholar
Higgins, J. J., Larson, G. E., and Higgins, K. F. 2002. Managing tallgrass prairie remnants: the effects of different types of land stewardship on grassland bird habitat. Ecol. Restor 20:18–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbs, R. J. and Huenneke, L. F. 1992. Disturbance, diversity, and invasion: implications for conservation. Conserv. Biol 6:324–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, P. M., Richardson, D. M., Van Wilgen, B. W., and Gelderblom, C. 2000. Recovery of South African fynbos vegetation following alien woody plant clearing and fire: implications for restoration. Austral Ecol 25:631–639.Google Scholar
Howard, J. L. and Winkler, G. 1996. Bromus inermis . In: Fischer (compiler), W. C. Fire effects information system [online]. USDA, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Missoula, MT. http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/. Accessed: May 16, 2009.Google Scholar
Jordan, N. R., Larson, D. L., and Huerd, S. C. 2008. Soil modification by invasive plants: effects on native and invasive species of mixed-grass prairies. Biol. Invasions 10:177–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinucan, R. J. and Smeins, F. E. 1992. Soil seed bank of a semiarid Texas grassland under three long-term (36-years) grazing regimes. Am. Midl. Nat 128:11–21.Google Scholar
Kirsch, L. M. and Kruse, A. D. 1973. Prairie fires and wildlife. In. Proceedings of the Tall Timbers Fire Ecology Conference. Tallahassee, FL Tall Timbers Research Station. 12:289–303.Google Scholar
Knievel, D. P., Jacques, A. V. A., and Smith, D. 1971. Influence of growth stage and stubble height on herbage yields and persistence of smooth bromegrass and timothy. Agron. J 63:430–434.Google Scholar
Kyser, G. B., DiTomaso, J. M., Doran, M. P., Orloff, S. B., Wilson, R. G., Lancaster, D. L., Lile, D. F., and Porath, M. L. 2007. Control of medusahead (Taeniatherum caput-medusae) and other annual grasses with imazapic. Weed Technol 21:66–75.Google Scholar
LaRossa, R. A. and Schloss, J. V. 1984. The sulfonylurea herbicide sulfometuron methyl is an extremely potent and selective inhibitor of acetolactate synthase in Salmonella typhimurium . J. Biol. Chem 259:8753–8757.Google Scholar
Mack, R. N., Simberloff, D., Lonsdale, W. M., Evans, H., Clout, M., and Bazzaz, F. A. 2000. Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecol. Appl 10:689–710.Google Scholar
Mason, T. J. and French, K. 2007. Management regimes for a plant invader differentially impact resident communities. Biol. Conserv 136:246–259.Google Scholar
Masters, R. A., Nissen, S. J., Gaussoin, R. E., Beran, D. D., and Stougaard, R. N. 1996. Imidazolinone herbicides improve restoration of Great Plains grasslands. Weed Technol 10:392–403.Google Scholar
Mau-Crimmins, T. M. 2007. Effects of removing Cynodon dactylon from a recently abandoned agricultural field. Weed Res 47:212–221.Google Scholar
McCune, B. and Grace, J. B. 2002. Analysis of Ecological Communities. Gleneden Beach, OR MjM Software. 300 p.Google Scholar
Miller, K. F. 1997. Soil Survey of Deuel County, South Dakota. Washington, DC United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 272 p.Google Scholar
Monaco, T. A., Osmond, T. M., and Dewey, S. A. 2005. Medusahead control with fall- and spring-applied herbicides on northern Utah foothills. Weed Technol 19:653–658.Google Scholar
Murphy, R. K. and Grant, T. A. 2005. Land management history and floristics in mixed-grass prairie, North Dakota, USA. Nat. Areas J 25:351–358.Google Scholar
Nelson, J. K. 1997. Natural succession impeded by smooth brome (Bromus inermis) and intermediate wheatgrass (Agropyron intermedium) in an abandoned agricultural field. Proceedings of the 1997 International Conference on Ecological and Regional Conservation Strategies, Ft. Lauderdale, FL. http://www.osti.gov/bridge/servlets/purl/548679-AHqnVe/webviewable. Accessed: September 18, 2008.Google Scholar
Noss, R. F., LaRoe, E. T. III, and Scott, J. M. 1995. Endangered ecosystems of the United States: a preliminary assessment of loss and degradation. Biol. Rep 28. Washington, DC: National Biological Service, U.S. Department of the Interior. http://biology.usgs.gov/pubs/ecosys.htm. Accessed: September 10, 2006.Google Scholar
Ogden, J. A. E. and Rejmanek, M. 2005. Recovery of native plant communities after the control of a dominant invasive plant species, Foeniculum vulgare: implications for management. Biol. Conserv 125:427–439.Google Scholar
Old, S. M. 1969. Microclimate, fire, and plant production in an Illinois prairie. Ecol. Monogr 39:355–384.Google Scholar
Owensby, C. E. and Smith, E. F. 1973. Burning true prairie. Proceedings of the Third Midwest Prairie Conference, Manhattan, KS: Kansas State University 3:1–4.Google Scholar
Perez, C. J., Waller, S. S., Moser, L. E., Stubbendieck, J. L., and Steuter, A. A. 1998. Seedbank characteristics of a Nebraska sandhills prairie. J. Range Manag 51:55–62.Google Scholar
Poiani, K. A. and Johnson, W. C. 1991. Global warming and prairie wetlands: potential consequences for waterfowl habitat. BioScience 41:611–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabinowitz, D. and Rapp, J. K. 1980. Seed rain in a North American tallgrass prairie. J. Appl. Ecol 17:793–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Randall, J. M. 1996. Weed control for the preservation of biodiversity. Weed Technol 10:370–383.Google Scholar
Reynolds, J. H. and Smith, D. 1962. Trend of carbohydrate reserves in alfalfa, smooth bromegrass, and timothy grown under various cutting schedules. Crop Sci 2:333–336.Google Scholar
Ricketts, T. H., Dinerstein, E., Olson, D. M., et al. 1999. Terrestrial Ecoregions of North America: A Conservation Assessment. Washington, DC Island Press. 508 p.Google Scholar
Ruffner, M. E. and Barnes, T. G. 2010. Natural grassland response to herbicides and application timing for selective control of tall fescue, an invasive cool-season grass. Invasive Plant Sci. Manag 3:219–228.Google Scholar
Samson, J. F. and Moser, L. E. 1982. Sod-seeding perennial grasses into eastern Nebraska pastures. Agron. J 74:1055–1060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS 1989–2007. JMP, Version 7. Cary, NC SAS Institute Inc. 540 p.Google Scholar
Sather, N. 1987. Element stewardship abstract for Bromus inermis . The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, VA. http://www.invasive.org/gist/esadocs/documnts/bromine.pdf. Accessed: September 18, 2007.Google Scholar
Sather, N. 1996. Element stewardship abstract for Poa pratensis and Poa compressa . The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, VA. http://www.invasive.org/gist/esadocs/documnts/poa_pra.pdf. Accessed: September 18, 2007.Google Scholar
Saunders, D. A., Hobbs, R. J., and Margules, C. R. 1991. Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: a review. Conserv. Biol 5:18–32.Google Scholar
Schmidt, C. D., Hickman, K. R., Channell, R., Harmoney, K., and Stark, W. 2008. Competitive abilities of native grasses and non-native (Bothriochloa spp.) grasses. Plant Ecol 197:69–80.Google Scholar
Senseman, S. A. ed. 2007. Herbicide Handbook. 7th ed. Champaign, IL Weed Science Society of America. 458 p.Google Scholar
Shaner, D. L. and O'Conner, S. L. eds. 1991. The Imidazolinone Herbicides. Boca Raton, FL CRC Press. 304 p.Google Scholar
Shinn, S. L. and Thill, D. C. 2002. The response of yellow starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis), annual grasses, and smooth brome (Bromus inermis) to imazapic and picloram. Weed Technol 16:366–370.Google Scholar
Shinn, S. L. and Thill, D. C. 2004. Tolerance of several perennial grasses to imazapic. Weed Technol 18:60–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, M. D. and Knapp, A. K. 1999. Exotic plant species in C4-dominated grasslands: invasibility, disturbance, and community structure. Oecologia 120:605–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stacy, M. D., Perryman, B. L., Stahl, P. D., and Smith, M. A. 2005. Brome control and microbial inoculation effects in reclaimed cool-season grasslands. Range Ecol. Manag 58:161–166.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinauer, E. M. and Collins, S. L. 1996. Prairie ecology—the tallgrass prairie. Pages 39–52. In Samson, F. B. and Knopf, F. L. eds. Prairie Conservation: Preserving North America's Most Endangered Ecosystem. Washington, DC Island Press.Google Scholar
Stubbs, M. 2007. Land Conversion in the Northern Plains. Congressional Research Service Report for Congress. April 5. 16 p.Google Scholar
The Nature Conservancy, Northern Tallgrass Prairie Ecoregional Planning Team 1998. Ecoregional planning in the Northern Tallgrass Prairie ecoregion. Minneapolis, MN The Nature Conservancy, Midwest Regional Office. 208 p.Google Scholar
Towne, G. and Owensby, C. E. 1984. Long-term effects of annual burning at different dates in ungrazed Kansas tallgrass prairie. J. Range Manag 37:392–397.Google Scholar
Tunnell, S. J., Stubbendieck, J., Palazzolo, S., and Masters, R. A. 2006. Forb response to herbicides in a degraded tallgrass prairie. Nat. Areas J 26:72–77.Google Scholar
Vermeire, L. T. and Rinella, M. J. 2009. Fire alters emergence of invasive plant species from soil surface deposited seeds. Weed Sci 57:304–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vinton, M. A. and Goergen, E. R. 2006. Plant-soil feedbacks contribute to the persistence of Bromus inermis in tallgrass prairie. Ecosystems 9:967–976.Google Scholar
Vitousek, P. M., Walker, L. R., Whiteaker, L. D., Mueller-Dombois, D., and Matson, P. A. 1987. Biological invasion by Myrica faya alters ecosystem development in Hawaii. Science 238:802–804.Google Scholar
Waller, S. S. and Schmidt, D. K. 1983. Improvement of eastern Nebraska tallgrass range using atrazine or glyphosate. J. Range Manag 36:87–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Washburn, B. E. and Barnes, T. G. 2000. Native warm season grass and forb establishment using imazapic and 2,4-D. Native Plants J 1:61–68.Google Scholar
Washburn, B. E., Barnes, T. G., Rhoades, C. C., and Remington, R. 2002. Using imazapic and prescribed fire to enhance native warm-season grasslands in Kentucky, USA. Nat. Areas J 22:20–27.Google Scholar
Willson, G. D. 1991. Morphological characteristics of smooth brome to determine a prescribed burn date. Pages 113–116. In Smith, D. D. and Jacobs, C. A. eds. Proceedings of the 12th North American Prairie Conference. Cedar Falls, IA University of Northern Iowa.Google Scholar
Willson, G. D. and Stubbendieck, J. 1997. Fire effects on four growth stages of smooth brome (Bromus inermis Leyss.). Nat. Areas J 17:306–312.Google Scholar
Willson, G. D. and Stubbendieck, J. 2000. A provisional model for smooth brome management in degraded tallgrass prairie. Ecol. Restor 18 (1):34–38. Jamestown, ND: Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center Online. http://www.npwrc.usgs.gov/resource/plants/sbrome/sbrome.htm (Version 08DEC2000). Accessed: February 12, 2005.Google Scholar
Wilson, S. D. 1989. The suppression of native prairie by alien species introduced for revegetation. Landscape Urban Plan 17:113–119.Google Scholar
Zedler, J. and Loucks, O. L. 1969. Differential burning response of Poa pratensis fields and Andropogon scoparius prairies in central Wisconsin. Am. Midl. Nat 81:341–352.Google Scholar