Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T21:23:40.975Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Herbicide Management of Umbrella Dracaena (Dianella ensifolia) in a Florida State Park

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Jeffrey T. Hutchinson*
Affiliation:
University of Florida, Agronomy Department, Center for Aquatic and Invasive Plants, 7922 NW 71st Street, Gainesville, FL 32653
Elizabeth A. Gandy
Affiliation:
Florida Park Service, District 4 Administration, 1843 South Tamiami Trail, Osprey, FL 34229
Kenneth A. Langeland
Affiliation:
University of Florida, Agronomy Department, Center for Aquatic and Invasive Plants, 7922 NW 71st Street, Gainesville, FL 32653
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: jthutch@ufl.edu

Abstract

We evaluated herbicide treatments for control of umbrella dracaena, locally invasive in central Florida. Biannual treatments of imazapyr (3.2 and 6.4 g ai L−1), metsulfuron (0.08 and 0.16 g ai L−1), and imazapyr (0.8 g ai L−1) plus glyphosate (19.9 g ai L−1) reduced cover to < 3% at 12 mo, but no treatment eliminated the plant. In contrast, a single treatment on individual potted plants in greenhouse trials was highly effective with ≥ 98% necrosis/chlorosis at 6 mo and no regrowth at 9 mo posttreatment for most treatments. Management of umbrella dracaena will require more than two herbicide treatments with imazapyr, metsulfuron, glyphosate, or a combination of these herbicides if eradication is to be achieved. Because it is currently problematic and localized in one specific area in about 40 ha, it should be a high management priority before it spreads throughout Florida and possibly other states.

Type
Case Study
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Curtis, W. M. 1952. Variation in certain Tasmanian plants. New Phytol. 51:398414.Google Scholar
Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Division of Recreation and Parks. 2007. Highlands Hammock State Park Unit Management Plan. http://www.dep.state.fl.us/parks/planning/parkplans/HighlandsHammockStatePark.pdf. Accessed: May 15, 2010.Google Scholar
[FNAI] Florida Natural Areas Inventory and the Florida Department of Natural Resources. 1990. Guide to the Natural Communities of Florida. Tallahassee, FL. 111 p.Google Scholar
Gabor, T. S., Iiaagsma, T., Murkin, H. R., and Armson, E. 1995. Effects of triclopyr amine on purple loosestrife and non-target wetland plants in south-eastern Ontario, Canada. J. Aquat. Plant Manag. 33:4851.Google Scholar
Gandy, E. A., Hutchinson, J. T., and Langeland, K. A. 2009. Cerulean flaxlily—an invasive plant in Highlands Hammock State Park. Wildland Weeds 12(3):1015.Google Scholar
Hobbs, R. J. and Humphries, S. E. 1995. An integrated approach to the ecology and management of plant invasions. Conserv. Biol. 9:761770.Google Scholar
Jessop, J. P. 1979. Liliaceae. Pages 189235 in van Steenis, C. G. G. J., ed. Flora Malesiana. Ser. 1, Vol. 9, Part 1. Leiden, The Netherlands Noordhoff International Publishing.Google Scholar
Knezevic, S. Z., Smith, D., Kulm, R., Doty, D., Kinkaid, D., Goodrich, M., and Stolcpart, R. 2004. Purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria) control with herbicides: single-year application. Weed Tech. 18:12551260.Google Scholar
Ko, I.W.P., Corlett, R. T., and Xu, R.-J. 1998. Sugar composition of wild fruits in Hong Kong, China. J. Trop. Ecol. 14:381387.Google Scholar
Laufenberg, S. M., Sheley, R. L., Jacobs, J. S., and Borkowski, J. 2005. Herbicide effects on density and biomass of Russian knapweed (Acroptilon repens) and associated plant species. Weed Technol. 19:6272.Google Scholar
Longid, C. S. 1993. Studies on Philippine Liliaceae, two species from the Cordillera. Sci. Diliman 5:17.Google Scholar
Marafa, L. M. and Chau, K. C. 1999. Effect of hill fire on upland soil in Hong Kong. Forest Ecol. Manag. 120:97104.Google Scholar
Marrs, R. H. 1985. The effects of potential bracken and scrub control herbicides on lowland Calluna and grass heath communities in East Anglia, UK. Biol. Conserv. 32:1332.Google Scholar
Peng, S., Furong, L., Ting, Z., Leifu, C., Baoming, C., and Hua, P. 2008. Special ecological effects of ravines in Danxia landform, China. Acta Ecol. Sin. 28:29472953.Google Scholar
Sridith, K. and Laongpol, C. 2003. The preliminary study on some natural plant communities of the sandbars along eastern coast of peninsular Thailand. Songklanakarin J. Sci. Technol. 25:103113.Google Scholar
Wang, Z. 1984. Acute rodenticides in the control of rodent pest in China: a review. Pages 5463 in Clark, D. O., ed. Proceedings of the Eleventh Vertebrate Pest Conference. Davis, CA University of California.Google Scholar
Wild, H. 1953. Dianella ensifolia: a new generic record for continental Africa. Kew Bull. 8:251252.Google Scholar
Wunderlin, R. P. and Hansen, B. F. 2008. Atlas of Florida Vascular Plants. Institute for Systematic Botany, University of South Florida, Tampa. [Landry, S. M. and Campbell, K. N. (application development), Florida Center for Community Design and Research]. Available at: http://www.plantatlas.usf.edu/. Accessed: December 12, 2008.Google Scholar
Zomlefer, W. B. 1998. The genera of Hemerocallidaceae in the southeastern United States. Harvard Pap. Bot. 3:113145.Google Scholar
Zomlefer, W. B. 1999. Advances in angiosperm systematics: examples from the Liliales and Asparagales. J. Torrey Bot. Soc. 126:5862.Google Scholar