Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T12:54:08.016Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Integrating Herbicide Use and Perennial Grass Revegetation to Suppress Weeds in Noncrop Areas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Rob G. Wilson*
Affiliation:
Intermountain Research & Extension Center, 2816 Havlina Road, Tulelake, CA 96134
Steve B. Orloff
Affiliation:
University of California Cooperative Extension Siskiyou County, 1655 South Main St., Yreka, CA 96097
Donald L. Lancaster
Affiliation:
University of California Cooperative Extension Modoc County, 202 West 4th St., Alturas, CA 96101
Donald W. Kirby
Affiliation:
Superintendent and Emeritus, Intermountain Research & Extension Center, 2816 Havlina Road, Tulelake, CA 96134
Harry L. Carlson
Affiliation:
Superintendent and Emeritus, Intermountain Research & Extension Center, 2816 Havlina Road, Tulelake, CA 96134
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: rgwilson@ucdavis.edu

Abstract

Noncropland such as levees, roadsides, field borders, fencerows, and wildlife areas are vulnerable to weed invasion. Many sites have undergone frequent human disturbance, such as manipulation from surrounding land uses, and lack competitive, desirable vegetation. This study addressed the importance of revegetation in an integrated weed management program including revegetation for noncrop areas. The study evaluated 14 cool-season perennial grasses (seven native species and eight introduced species) for their establishment, vigor, and ability to suppress weeds. It also evaluated the impact of herbicides on weed control and grass establishment. Treatments were applied at three noncrop sites in Northeast California that were heavily infested with weeds. Chemical weed control during the year of seeding and the following year was critical for perennial grass establishment. Weed cover was greater than 50% whereas average seeded grass cover was less than 6% in untreated plots at all sites 2 yr after seeding. In contrast, average seeded grass cover at all sites was 22 to 31% 2 yr after seeding for treatments where herbicide use resulted in wide-spectrum weed control and grass safety. Increasing perennial grass cover decreased total weed cover across perennial grass species 1and 2 yr after seeding. Individual grass species' cover differed among sites. Two introduced grasses (tall wheatgrass and crested wheatgrass) and three native grasses (western wheatgrass, bluebunch wheatgrass, and thickspike wheatgrass) showed broad adaptation and had > 20% cover at all sites 2 yr after seeding. In herbicide-treated plots, these grasses reduced total weed cover by 43 to 98% compared to unseeded plots 2 yr after seeding.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Amor, R. L. and Stevens, P. L. 1975. Spread of weeds from a roadside to into sclerophyll forests at Dartmouth, Australia. Weed Res 16:111118.Google Scholar
Barbour, M. G., Burk, J. H., Pitts, W. D., Gilliam, F. S., and Schwartz, M. W. 1999. Terrestrial Plant Ecology. Menlo Park, CA Benjamin/Cummings. 649.Google Scholar
Berger, J. J. 1993. Ecological restoration and nonindigenous plant species: a review. Restor. Ecol 1:7482.Google Scholar
Blumenthal, D. M., Jordan, N. R., and Svenson, E. L. 2003. Weed control as a rationale for restoration: the example of tallgrass prairie. Conserv. Ecol 7:6. [online] URL:http://www.consecol.org/vol7/iss1/art6/. Accessed: April 15, 2009.Google Scholar
Borman, M. M., Krueger, W. C., and Johnson, D. E. 1991. Effects of established perennial grasses on yields of associated annual weeds. J. Range Manag 44:318326.Google Scholar
Buhler, D. D., Hartzler, R. G., and Forcella, F. 1997. Implications of weed seedbank dynamics to weed management. Weed Sci 45:329336.Google Scholar
Dekker, J. 1999. Soil weed seed banks and weed management. J. Crop Prod 2:139166.Google Scholar
DiTomaso, J. M. 2000. Invasive weeds in rangelands: species, impacts, and management. Weed Sci 48:255265.Google Scholar
Herron, G. J. R., Sheley, L., Maxwell, B. D., and Jacobs, J. S. 2001. Influence of nutrient availability on the interaction between spotted knapweed and bluebunch wheatgrass. Ecol. Restor 9:326331.Google Scholar
Hobbs, R. J. and Humphries, S. E. 2002. An integrated approach to the ecology and management of plant invasions. Conserv. Biol 9:761770.Google Scholar
Jacobs, J. S., Carpinelli, M. F., and Sheley, R. L. 1999. Revegetating noxious weed-infested rangeland. Pages 133145. in Sheley, R. L. and Petroff, J. K. Biology and Management of Noxious Rangeland Weeds. Corvallis, OR Oregon State University Press.Google Scholar
Kelley, A. D. and Bruns, V. F. 1975. Dissemination of weed seeds by irrigation water. Weed Sci 23:486493.Google Scholar
Radosevich, S. R., Stubbs, M. M., and Ghersa, C. M. 2003. Plant invasions—process and patterns. Weed Sci 51:254259.Google Scholar
Sheley, R. L., Svejcar, T. J., and Maxwell, B. D. 1996. A theoretical framework for developing successional weed management strategies on rangeland. Weed Technol 10:766773.Google Scholar
Thill, D. C. and Shinn, S. L. 2004. Tolerance of several perennial grasses to imazapic. Weed Technol 18:6065.Google Scholar