Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:32:31.744Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Predicting the Distribution of Perennial Pepperweed (Lepidium latifolium), San Francisco Bay Area, California

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Melanie Vanderhoof ,
Barbara A. Holzman  and
Chris Rogers
Melanie Vanderhoof*
Affiliation:
Department of Geography and Human Environmental Studies, San Francisco State University, 1600 Holloway Ave., San Francisco, CA 94132
Barbara A. Holzman
Affiliation:
Department of Geography and Human Environmental Studies, San Francisco State University, 1600 Holloway Ave., San Francisco, CA 94132
Chris Rogers
Affiliation:
ESA, 350 Frank H. Ogawa Plaza, Suite 300, Oakland, CA 94612
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: mvanderhoof@mbakercorp.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Perennial pepperweed is an invasive plant species that occurs throughout the western United States. This study develops a predictive model for perennial pepperweed distribution for the San Francisco Bay Area, based on spatial variables. Distribution data were developed by mapping perennial pepperweed along the shoreline of the South San Francisco Bay, using geographic positioning system units. Spatial relationships between its distribution and spatial variables were tested using binomial logistic regression. Predictive models were mapped using geographic information systems (GIS), and high risk areas within the San Francisco Bay Area were identified. Perennial pepperweed was found to occur within marsh habitats with full tidal action and near open water. This study demonstrates that habitat variables from widely available GIS layers can be used to predict distribution patterns for perennial pepperweed. The model results were compared to land ownership within the study area to demonstrate a management application of the model.

Keywords

Perennial pepperweed, Lepidium latifolium L. LEPLAPredictive modelinvasivedistributionriskSan Francisco BayGIS
Type
Research
Information
Invasive Plant Science and Management , Volume 2 , Issue 3 , July 2009 , pp. 260 - 269
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Atwater, B. F., Conard, S. G., Dowden, J. N., Hedel, C. W., MacDonald, R. L., and Savage, W. 1979. History, landforms and vegetation of the estuary's tidal marshes. Pages 347–400. In Conomos, T. J. San Francisco Bay: The Urbanized Estuary. San Francisco Pacific Division/American Association for the Advancement of Science.Google Scholar
Bastin, L. and Thomas, C. D. 1999. The distribution of plant species in urban vegetation fragments. Landsc. Ecol 14:493–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bio, A. M. F., De Becker, P., De Bie, E., Huybrechts, W., and Wassen, M. 2002. Prediction of plant species distribution in lowland river valleys in Belgium: modeling species response to site conditions. Biodivers. Conserv 11:2189–2216.Google Scholar
Blank, R. R. and Young, J. A. 1997. Lepidium latifolium: influences on soil properties, rate of spread, and competitive stature. Pages 69–80. In Brock, J. H., Wade, M., Pysek, P., and Green, D. Plant Invasions: Studies from North America and Europe. Leiden, The Netherlands Brackhuys.Google Scholar
Brigham, C. 2004. Towards eradication of Lepidium latifolium at Paramount Ranch: control methods and a test of restoration treatments. Pages 35–37. in. Proceedings of the California Invasive Plant Council. Ventura, CA California Invasive Plant Council.Google Scholar
California Department of Food and Agriculture 2004. Tall Whitetop or Perennial Pepperweed (Lepidium latifolium L.). http://www.cdfa.ca.gov/phpps/ipc/weedinfo/lepidium.htm. Accessed: September 20, 2006.Google Scholar
California Resources Agency Legacy Project 2005. Public Conservation and Trust Lands, California Environmental Info Catalog. Sacramento, CA California Legacy Project Data Collection.Google Scholar
Cawsey, E. M., Austin, M. P., and Baker, B. L. 2002. Regional vegetation mapping in Australia: a case study in the practical use of statistical modeling. Biodivers. Conserv 11:2239–2274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, H., Qualls, R. G., and Miller, G. C. 2002. Adaptive responses of Lepidium latifolium to soil flooding: biomass allocation, adventitious rooting, aerenchyma formation and ethylene production. Environ. Exp. Bot 48:119–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, A. 2000. An introduction to the San Francisco Estuary. San Francisco Estuary Project. San Francisco, CA San Francisco Estuary Institute. 40.Google Scholar
Collingham, Y. C., Wadsworth, R. A., Huntley, B., and Hulme, P. E. 2000. Predicting the spatial distribution of non-indigenous riparian weeds: issues of spatial scale and extent. J. Appl. Ecol 37/Suppl. 1:13–27.Google Scholar
Donaldson, S. G. 1997. Flood-borne noxious weeds: impacts on riparian areas and wetlands. Pages 25–33. in. Proceedings of the California Exotic Pest Plant Council. Concord, CA California Exotic Pest Plant Council.Google Scholar
Eiswerth, M. E., Singletary, L., Zimmerman, J. R., and Johnson, W. S. 2005. Dynamic benefit-cost analysis for controlling perennial pepperweed (Lepidium latifolium). Weed Technol 19/2:237–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garson, G. D. 2006. Logistic Regression. http://www2.chass.ncsu.edu/garson/PA765/logistic.htm. Accessed: January 25, 2007.Google Scholar
Gilham, J., Hild, A., Johnson, J., Hunt, E., and Whitson, T. 2004. Weed Invasion Susceptibility Prediction (WISP) model for use with geographic information systems. Arid Land Res. Manag 18/1:1–12.Google Scholar
Grossinger, R., Alexander, J., Cohen, A., and Collins, J. 1998. Introduced Tidal Marsh Plants in the San Francisco Estuary: Regional Distribution and Priorities for Control. San Francisco San Francisco Estuary Institute. 42.Google Scholar
Guisan, A., Edwards, T. C. Jr., and Hastie, T. 2002. Generalized linear and generalized additive models in studies of species distributions: setting the scene. Ecol. Model 157:89–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guisan, A. and Thuiller, W. 2005. Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models. Ecol Lett 8:993–1009.Google Scholar
Guisan, A. and Zimmermann, N. E. 2000. Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecol. Model 135:147–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higgins, S. I., Richardson, D. M., Cowling, R. M., and Trinder-Smith, T. H. 1999. Predicting the landscape-scale distribution of alien plants and their threat to plant diversity. Conserv. Biol 13/2:303–313.Google Scholar
Hogle, I., Viers, J. H., and Quinn, J. F. 2006. Perennial pepperweed infestation on the Cosumnes River experimental floodplain. Sacramento, CA California Bay-Delta Authority. 26. ERP#2001-01.Google Scholar
Howald, A. 2000. Lepidium latifolium . Pages 222–227. In Bossard, C. C., Randall, J. M., and Hshovsky, M. C. Invasive Plants of California's Wildlands. Berkeley, CA University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kent, U. K. M., Stevens, R. A., and Zhang, L. 1999. Urban plant ecology patterns and processes: a case study of the flora of the city of Plymouth, Devon. J. Biogeogr 26:1281–1298.Google Scholar
Mao, L. 2006. Lab 10: Mapping Habitat for Pseudo Bear Using Environmental Data, GIS for Environmental Modeling. http://www.acsu.buffalo.edu/~liangmao/EMGIS_LAB/Lab10.pdf. Accessed February 8, 2007.Google Scholar
May, M. 1995. Lepidium latifolium L. in the San Francisco Estuary. Berkeley, CA University of California. 16.Google Scholar
National Invasive Species Council 2001. Meeting the Invasive Species Challenge: National Invasive Species Management Plan. Washington, D.C. 80.Google Scholar
Neville, L. E. and Murphy, S. 2001. Invasive alien species: forging cooperation to address a borderless issue. Int. Assoc. Ecol. Newsl. Spring/Summer 2001:3–7.Google Scholar
Nielsen, C., Hartvig, P., and Kollmann, J. 2008. Predicting the distribution of the invasive alien Heracleum mantegazzianum at two different spatial scales. Divers. Distrib 14:307–317.Google Scholar
Renz, M. 2001. Element stewardship abstract for Lepidium latifolium L. The Nature Conservancy. http://tncweeds.ucdavis.edu/esadocs/documnts/lepilat.pdf. Accessed February 8, 2007.Google Scholar
Renz, M. 2002. Biology, ecology and control of perennial pepperweed (Lepidium latifolium L.). Ph.D Dissertation. Davis, CA University of California. 128.Google Scholar
Sanderson, E. W., Foin, T. C., and Ustin, S. L. 2001. A simple empirical model of salt marsh plant spatial distributions with respect to a tidal channel network. Ecol. Monit 139:293–307.Google Scholar
[SFEI] San Francisco Estuary Institute 1997. Modern Baylands: EcoAtlas Information System. http://www.sfei.org/ecoatlas/pricing.html. Accessed: December 15, 2006.Google Scholar
Skinner, M. and Pavlik, B. 1994. Inventory of Rare and Endangered Vascular Plants of California. Sacramento, CA California Native Plant Society. 338.Google Scholar
Spautz, H. and Nur, N. 2004. Impacts of non-native perennial pepperweed (Lepidium latifolium) on abundance, distribution and reproductive success of San Francisco Bay tidal marsh birds. Stinson Beach, CA PRBO Conservation Science. 22.Google Scholar
Spenst, R. O., Foin, T. C., and Miles, A. K. 2004. Invasion dynamics of perennial pepperweed along the salinity gradient. Pages 29–33. in. Proceedings of the California Invasive Plant Council. Ventura, CA California Invasive Plant Council.Google Scholar
State of California, Department of Conservation, Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program 2004. FMMP GIS Data. http://www.conservation.ca.gov/DLRP/fmmp/map_products/download_gis_data.htm. Accessed: November 15, 2006.Google Scholar
Thuiller, W. 2003. BIOMOD—optimizing predictions of species distributions and projecting potential future shifts under global change. Glob. Change Biol 9:1353–1362.Google Scholar
Trumbo, J. 1994. Perennial pepperweed: a threat to wildland areas. CalEPPC News 2:4–5.Google Scholar
U.S. Census Bureau 2002. TIGER 2000 Transportation Layers. http://gis.ca.gov/BrowseCatalog.epl. Accessed: November 20, 2006.Google Scholar
[USCOP] U.S. Commission on Ocean Policy 2004. Ch. 17: Preventing the spread of invasive species. Pages 211–221. in, An Ocean Blueprint for the 21st Century: Final Report.Google Scholar
[USGS] U.S. Geological Survey 2003. 2m Digital Surface Model. Menlo Park, CA USGS.Google Scholar
[USGS and U.S. EPA] U.S. Geological Survey and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 2005. National Hydrography Dataset: High Resolution. http://nhd.usgs.gov/data.html. Accessed: November 15, 2006.Google Scholar
[USGS and NOAA] U.S. Geological Survey and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 2002. National Land Cover Data: Coastal Land Cover. Menlo Park, CA USGS.Google Scholar
Van Horssen, P. W., Schot, P. P., and Barendregt, A. 1999. A GIS-based plant prediction model for wetland ecosystems. Landsc. Ecol 14/3:253–265.Google Scholar
Young, J. A., Palmquist, D. E., Blank, R. S., and Turner, C. E. 1995. Ecology and control of perennial pepperweed (Lepidium latifolium L.). Pages 29–32. in. Proceedings of the California Exotic Pest Plant Council. Pacific Grove, CA California Exotic Pest Plant Council.Google Scholar
Young, J. A., Palmquist, D. E., and Wotring, S. O. 1997. The invasive nature of Lepidium latifolium: a review. Pages 59–68. In Brock, J. H., Wade, M., Pysek, P., and Green, D. Plant Invasions: Studies from North America and Europe. Leiden, The Netherlands Brackhuys.Google Scholar
Young, J. A. and Turner, C. 1995. Lepidium latifolium L. in California. CalEPPC News 3/3:4–5.Google Scholar
Zerbe, S., Choi, I., and Kowarik, I. 2004. Characteristics and habitats of non-native plant species in the city of Chonju, southern Korea. Ecol. Res 19:91–98.Google Scholar
Zhang, Z., Xie, Y., and Wu, Y. 2006. Human disturbance, climate and biodiversity determine biological invasion at a regional scale. Integr. Zool 1:130–138.Google Scholar