Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T17:06:32.488Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reestablishment Potential of Beach Vitex (Vitex rotundifolia) after Removal and Control Efforts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Matthew M. Cousins ,
Jeanne Briggs ,
Ted Whitwell ,
Chuck Gresham  and
Jack Whetstone
Matthew M. Cousins
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29632
Jeanne Briggs
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29632
Ted Whitwell*
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29632
Chuck Gresham
Affiliation:
Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634
Jack Whetstone
Affiliation:
Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: twhtwll@clemson.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Beach vitex is an invasive plant of coastal areas of the southeastern United States from Maryland to Georgia. Many resources have been dedicated to the control of established beach vitex stands. Successful eradication will require knowledge of this plant's ability to reestablish from seed after control efforts. To understand seed-based regenerative potential, studies were conducted to characterize the fruits and seeds, document the existence and size of seed banks, determine stratification requirements for germination, and ascertain seed dormancy mechanisms. Studies of fruit lots from three consecutive years (2003 to 2005) found that the average fruit contained 1.39 seeds, and more than 76% of fruits contained at least one viable seed. A positive correlation existed between seed number and both fruit mass and fruit diameter. A substantial soil seed bank was discovered that contained viable seeds 4 yr after vegetation removal. Stratification was required for seed germination. All stratification treatments induced germination, with highest rates realized when stratification was performed at 10 C for 8 or 12 wk. Germination rates were modestly increased (from 0 to 17%) through mild scarification in the absence of stratification. Results indicate that beach vitex has physical (fruit coat) and physiological (seed) dormancy mechanisms that are capable of delaying germination for multiple seasons, allowing development of a soil seed bank. Beach vitex can reestablish from seed after vegetation removal.

Keywords

Beach vitex, Vitex rotundifolia L. f.Dormancy mechanismfruitgerminationlandscape plantseed viabilityinvasiveseed bank
Type
Research
Information
Invasive Plant Science and Management , Volume 3 , Issue 3 , November 2010 , pp. 327 - 333
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Belhadj, S., Gerasopoulos, D., and Maloupa, E. 1998. Improvement of germination of Vitex agnus-castus L. seeds with seed pre-treatments. Acta Hort. (ISHS) 454:207–212.Google Scholar
[CBVTF] Carolinas Beach Vitex Task Force 2009. Beach Vitex: Carolinas Newest Coastal Menace. http://www.beachvitex.org. Accessed April 10, 2010.Google Scholar
ChongMin, P. and EulSoo, P. 2001. Growing characteristics and propagation of Vitex rotundifolia for development of rehabilitation plant in seaboard area. Korean J. Environ. Ecol 15:57–58.Google Scholar
Cousins, M. M., Briggs, J., Gresham, C., Whetstone, J., and Whitwell, T. 2010. Beach vitex (Vitex rotundifolia): an invasive coastal species. Invasive Plant Sci. Manag 3:340–345.Google Scholar
Cousins, M. M., Gresham, C. A., Riley, M. B., and Whitwell, T. 2009. Beach dune sand hydrophobicity due to presence of beach vitex (Vitex rotundifolia L. f.). J. Agric. Food Chem 57:409–415.Google Scholar
de Kok, R. 2007. The genus Vitex (Lamiaceae) in New Guinea and the south Pacific islands. Kew Bull 62:587–603.Google Scholar
Dirr, M. A. 1998. Manual of Woody Landscape Plants: Their Identification, Ornamental Characteristics, Culture, Propagation, and Uses. Champaign, IL Stipes Publishing. 1092 p.Google Scholar
[FOCEC] Flora of China Editorial Committee 1994. Vitex . Flora of China 17:28–32.Google Scholar
Gresham, C. A. and Neal, A. 2004. An evaluation of the invasive potential of beach vitex (Vitex rotundifolia). The Belle W. Baruch Institute of Coastal Ecology and Forest Science, Clemson University, http://www.beachvitex.org. Accessed: April 10, 2010.Google Scholar
[ISTA] International Seed Testing Association 1985. Biochemical tests for viability. International rules for seed testing. Seed Sci. Technol 13:327–483.Google Scholar
Lee, J. S., Ihm, B. S., Cho, D. S., Son, D. Y., and Kim, J. W. 2007. Soil particle sizes and plant communities on coastal dunes. J. Plant Biol 50:475–479.Google Scholar
Munir, A. A. 1987. A taxonomic revision of the genus Vitex L. (Verbenaceae) in Australia. J. Adel. Bot. Gard 10:31–79.Google Scholar
[NCDA&CS] North Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services 2010. North Carolina Noxious Weeds List. http://www.agr.state.nc.us/plantindustry/plant/weed/noxweed.htm. Accessed: March 23, 2010.Google Scholar
Neal, M. C. 1965. In Gardens of Hawaii. Honolulu Bishop Museum Press. 728 p.Google Scholar
Olsen, R. T. and Bell, A. C. 2005. History of beach vitex cultivation: A potential invasive ornamental. SNA Research Conference Proceedings 50:531–533.Google Scholar
Pope, W. T. 1968. Manual of Wayside Plants of Hawaii. Tokyo Charles E. Tuttle Publishers Inc. 195–196.Google Scholar
Umali-Garcia, M. 1980. Effect of pericarp removal on the germination of molave (Vitex parviflora Juss.) seeds. Sylvatrop: Philipp. For. Res. J 5:61–66.Google Scholar