Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T19:19:20.510Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Russian Knapweed (Acroptilon repens) Control with Low Rates of Aminopyralid on Range and Pasture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Stephen F. Enloe*
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Soils, Auburn University, AL 36849
Guy B. Kyser
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA 95616
Steven A. Dewey
Affiliation:
Utah State University, Logan UT, 84322
Vanelle Peterson
Affiliation:
Dow AgroSciences, 28884 S. Marshall Road, Mulino, OR 97042
Joseph M. DiTomaso
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA 95616
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: sfe001@auburn.edu

Abstract

Russian knapweed is an invasive weed of rangeland, pasture, and natural areas throughout western North America. Aminopyralid is a new pyridine carboxylic acid herbicide that has activity on Russian knapweed at lower use rates than current standard treatments. The objectives of this study were to compare aminopyralid efficacy at the bud to early flower timing and the fall timing with commercial standards for Russian knapweed control. Studies were conducted at five locations in California, Utah, and Wyoming in heavily infested pastures or rangeland. When applied in summer at the bud to early flower timing, aminopyralid at 0.07 kg ae/ha controlled Russian knapweed effectively and was comparable to picloram + 2,4-D amine (0.56 + 1.12 kg ae/ha) at 12 and 24 months after treatment (MAT). The addition of 2,4-D with lower rates of aminopyralid did not improve control. When applied after seed set at the fall timing, control from aminopyralid at 0.05 kg ae/ha and higher was also comparable to picloram (0.56 kg ae/ha) and better than clopyralid (0.42 kg ae/ha) and imazapic (0.18 and 0.21 kg ae/ha) 12 and 21 MAT. Aminopyralid controlled Russian knapweed effectively at lower use rates than current commercial standards and good control lasted for at least 21 to 24 MAT.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Benz, L. J., Beck, K. G., Whitson, T. D., and Koch, D. W. 1999. Reclaiming Russian knapweed infested rangeland. J. Range Manag 52:351356.Google Scholar
Bottoms, R. M. and Whitson, T. D. 1998. A systems approach for the management of Russian knapweed (Centaurea repens). Weed Technol 12:363366.Google Scholar
Carrithers, V. F., Burch, P. L., Kline, W. N., Masters, R. A., Nelson, J. A., Halstvedt, M. B., Troth, J. L., and Breuninger, J. M. 2005. Aminopyralid: a new reduced risk active ingredient for control of broadleaf invasive and noxious weeds. Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci 58:5960.Google Scholar
Dewey, S. A. and Mace, R. W. 2005. Russian knapweed control in pasture with chlorsulfuron. Las Cruces, NM Western Society of Weed Science Research Progress Rep. P. 6.Google Scholar
Duncan, C. A. 2005. Russian knapweed (Acroptilon repens (L.) DC). Pages 815. in Duncan, C. L. and Clark, J. K., editors. Invasive Plants of Range and Wildlands and Their Environmental, Economic, and Societal Impacts. Lawrence, KS Weed Science Society of America.Google Scholar
Duncan, C. A. and Jachetta, J. J. 2005. Introduction. Pages 17. in Duncan, C. L. and Clark, J. K., editors. Invasive Plants of Range and Wildlands and Their Environmental, Economic, and Societal Impacts. Lawrence, KS Weed Science Society of America.Google Scholar
Enloe, S. F., Lym, R. G., Wilson, R., Westra, P., Nissen, S., Beck, G., Moechnig, M., Peterson, V., Masters, R., and Halstvedt, M. 2007. Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) control with aminopyralid in range, pasture, and non-crop areas. Weed Technol 21:890894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrell, J. A., Mullahey, J. J., Langeland, K. A., and Kline, W. N. 2006. Control of tropical soda apple (Solanum viarum) with aminopyralid. Weed Technol 20:453457.Google Scholar
Grant, D. W., Peters, D. P. C., Beck, K. G., and Fraleigh, H. D. 2003. Influence of an exotic species, Acroptilon repens (L.) DC., on seedling emergence and growth of native grasses. Plant Ecol 166:157166.Google Scholar
Hare, D. D., McFadden, A. G., McGregor, W. R., Juras, L. T., Satchivi, N. M., and Turnbull, G. C. 2005. Aminopyralid: a new herbicide for broadleaf weed control in rangeland and pastures in Canada and United States. Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci 58:59.Google Scholar
Jachetta, J. J., Havens, P. L., Dybowski, J. A., Kranzfelder, J. A., and Tiu, C. 2005. Aminopyralid: a new reduced risk herbicide for invasive species control: toxicology, ecotoxicology, and environmental fate profile. Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci 58:6061.Google Scholar
Laufenberg, S. M., Sheley, R. L., Jacobs, J. S., and Borkowski, J. 2005. Herbicide effects on density and biomass of Russian knapweed (Acroptilon repens) and associated plant species. Weed Technol 19:6272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maddox, D. M., Mayfield, A., and Poritz, N. H. 1985. Distribution of yellow starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis) and Russian knapweed (Centaurea repens). Weed Sci 33:315327.Google Scholar
Mangold, J. M. and Jacobs, J. 2007. Ecology and management of perennial pepperweed (Lepidium latifolium L.). U.S. Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service Technical Notes Montana-Invasive Species-MT-11. Pages 8 p.Google Scholar
Mangold, J. M., Poulsen, C. L., and Carpinelli, M. F. 2007. Revegetating Russian knapweed (Acroptilon repens) infestations using morphologically diverse species and seedbed preparation. Rangeland Ecol. Manag 60:378385.Google Scholar
Mealor, B. A. and Hild, A. L. 2007. Post-invasion evolution of native plant populations: a test of biological resilience. Oikos 116:14931500.Google Scholar
Ou, X. and Watson, A. K. 1993. Mass-culture of Subanguina picridis and its bioherbicidal efficacy on Acroptilon repens . J. Nematol 25:8994.Google ScholarPubMed
Panter, K. E. 1991. Neurotoxicity of the knapweeds (Centaurea spp.) in horses. Pages 316324. in James, L. F. and Evans, J. O., editors. Noxious Range Weeds. Boulder, CO Westview.Google Scholar
Rogers, C. F. 1928. Canada thistle and Russian knapweed and their control. Fort Collins, CO Colorado Agricultural College, Colorado Experiment Station Bulletin 348. 44 p.Google Scholar
Sheley, R. L., Laufenberg, S. M., Jacobs, J. S., and Borkowski, J. 2007. Restoring species richness and diversity in a Russian knapweed (Acroptilon repens)–infested riparian plant community using herbicides. Weed Sci 55:311318.Google Scholar
Shultz, B. 2005. Paradise Valley weed control demonstration plot: Russian knapweed. Reno, NV University of Nevada Cooperative Extension Special Publication 05–19. 12 p.Google Scholar
Skinner, K., Smith, L., and Rice, P. 2000. Using noxious weed lists to prioritize targets for developing weed management strategies. Weed Sci 48:640644.Google Scholar
Tyrer, S. J., Hild, A. L., and Mealor, B. A. 2007. Establishment of native species in soils from Russian knapweed (Acroptilon repens) invasions. Rangeland Ecol. Manag 60:604612.Google Scholar
Watson, A. K. 1980. The biology of Canadian weeds. 43. Acroptilon (Centaurea) repens (L.) DC. Canadian J. Plant Sci 60:9931004.Google Scholar
Whitson, T. D., Aagard, S. D., and Bennett, L. E. 1997. The effects of fall applications of various herbicides on Russian knapweed (Centaurea repens). Newark, CA Western Society of Weed Science Research Progress Rep. P. 6.Google Scholar
Whitson, T. D., Tatman, W. R., Aagard, S. D., and Rose, K. K. 1998. The effects of late summer applications of various herbicides on Russian knapweed. Newark, CA Western Society of Weed Science Research Progress Rep. P. 13.Google Scholar