Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T16:09:54.539Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Treatment Alternatives and Timing Affect Seeds of African Mustard (Brassica tournefortii), an Invasive Forb in American Southwest Arid Lands

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Scott R. Abella ,
Alexis A. Suazo ,
Carrie M. Norman  and
Alice C. Newton
Scott R. Abella*
Affiliation:
National Park Service, Washington Office, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Directorate, Biological Resource Management Division, 1201 Oakridge Drive, Fort Collins, CO 80525
Alexis A. Suazo
Affiliation:
College of Natural Resources, Department of Forest, Rangeland, and Fire Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844
Carrie M. Norman
Affiliation:
National Park Service, Lake Mead National Recreation Area, 601 Nevada Highway, Boulder City, NV 89005
Alice C. Newton
Affiliation:
National Park Service, Lake Mead National Recreation Area, 601 Nevada Highway, Boulder City, NV 89005
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: scott_abella@nps.gov
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Developing management strategies for invasive plant species requires identifying effective treatment methods (e.g., physical or chemical treatments) and optimally timing their application. For invasive annual plants, effects of treatments on seed production and germinability are paramount to reduce seed banks and subsequent plant establishment. We compared effects of a range of physical and chemical treatments applied to plants containing seeds at different developmental stages at field sites in the Mojave Desert (Nevada and Arizona) for managing the exotic annual forb, African mustard. Effectiveness of physical treatments (hand pulling entire plants, breaking plants, or separating siliques from plants) for reducing African mustard seed size and germination varied by treatment and seed maturity stage at which treatments were applied. With all treated plant material remaining in the field (i.e., not bagged and transported off site), hand pulling or breaking plants resulted in 90 to 100% of developing and developed seeds still able to germinate. Separating siliques from plants, however, resulted in 0% germination of undeveloped and developing seeds. All three tested herbicides (glyphosate, 2,4-D, and metsulfuron) reduced germination to zero or near zero across all seed development stages. Results suggest that physical treatments are most effective at early stages of seed development, whereas several different herbicides are effective across seed developmental stages. Results also highlight the importance of considering the potential for continued seed development and germinability on treated plant material when choosing invasive plant treatment types and timing.

Keywords

African mustard, Brassica tournefortii GouanChemicaldesertgerminationherbicidephysicalpulling
Type
Research
Information
Invasive Plant Science and Management , Volume 6 , Issue 4 , December 2013 , pp. 559 - 567
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Abella, S. R., Lee, A. C., and Suazo, A. A. 2011. Effects of burial depth and substrate on the emergence of Bromus rubens and Brassica tournefortii . Bull. South. Calif. Acad. Sci. 110:17–24.Google Scholar
Abella, S. R., Spencer, J. E., Hoines, J., and Nazarchyk, C. 2009. Assessing an exotic plant surveying program in the Mojave Desert, Clark County, Nevada, USA. Environ. Monit. Assess. 151:221–230.Google Scholar
Adkins, J. K. and Barnes, T. G. 2013. Herbicide treatment and timing for controlling Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis) and tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea) in cool season grasslands of central Kentucky, USA. Nat. Areas J. 33:31–38.Google Scholar
Aigner, P. A. and Woerly, R. J. 2011. Herbicides and mowing to control barb goatgrass (Aegilops triuncialis) and restore native plants in serpentine grasslands. Invasive Plant Sci. Manag. 4:448–457.Google Scholar
Bangle, D. N., Walker, L. R., and Powell, E. A. 2008. Seed germination of the invasive plant Brassica tournefortii (African mustard) in the Mojave Desert. West. N. Am. Nat. 68:334–342.Google Scholar
Barrows, C. W., Allen, E. B., Brooks, M. L., and Allen, M. F. 2009. Effects of an invasive plant on a desert sand dune landscape. Biol. Invasions 11:673–686.Google Scholar
Bond, W. J., Honing, M., and Maze, K. E. 1999. Seed size and seedling emergence: an allometric relationship and some ecological implications. Oecologia 120:132–136.Google Scholar
Brooks, M. L. 2000. Competition between alien annual grasses and native annual plants in the Mojave Desert. Am. Midl. Nat. 144:92–108.Google Scholar
Brooks, M. L. 2009. Spatial and temporal distribution of non-native plants in upland areas of the Mojave Desert. Pages 101–124 in Webb, R. H., Fenstermaker, L. F., Heaton, J. S., Hughson, D. L., McDonald, E. V., and Miller, D. M., eds. The Mojave Desert: Ecosystem Processes and Sustainability. Reno, NV University of Nevada Press.Google Scholar
Brooks, M. L. and Berry, K. H. 2006. Dominance and environmental correlates of alien annual plants in the Mojave Desert, USA. J. Arid Environ. 67:100–124.Google Scholar
Brooks, M. L., Draper, J. V., and Trader, M. R. 2006. Controlling African mustard: evaluation of herbicide and mechanical treatments (California). Ecol. Restor. 24:277–278.Google Scholar
DiTomaso, J. M., Enloe, S. F., and Pitcairn, M. J. 2007. Exotic plant management in California annual grasslands. Pages 281–296 in Stromberg, M. R., Corbin, J. D., and D'Antonio, C. M., eds. 2007. California Grasslands: Ecology and Management. Berkeley, CA University of California Press.Google Scholar
Engel, E. C. and Abella, S. R. 2011. Vegetation recovery in a desert landscape after wildfires: influences of community type, time since fire and contingency effects. J. Appl. Ecol. 48:1401–1410.Google Scholar
Flory, S. L. and Clay, K. 2009. Invasive plant removal method determines native plant community responses. J. Appl. Ecol. 46:434–442.Google Scholar
Kyser, G. B., Creech, J. E., Zhang, J., and DiTomaso, J. M. 2012. Selective control of medusahead (Taeniatherum caput-medusae) in California sagebrush scrub using low rates of glyphosate. Invasive Plant Sci. Manag. 5:1–8.Google Scholar
Love, J. P. and Anderson, J. T. 2009. Seasonal effects of four control methods on the invasive Morrow's honeysuckle (Lonicera morrowii) and initial responses of understory plants in a southwestern Pennsylvania old field. Restor. Ecol. 17:549–559.Google Scholar
Marushia, R. G., Brooks, M. L., and Holt, J. S. 2012. Phenology, growth, and fecundity as determinants of distribution in closely related nonnative taxa. Invasive Plant Sci. Manag. 5:217–229.Google Scholar
Marushia, R. G., Cadotte, M. W., and Holt, J. S. 2010. Phenology as a basis for management of exotic annual plants in desert invasions. J. Appl. Ecol. 47:1290–1299.Google Scholar
Minnich, R. A. and Sanders, A. C. 2000. Brassica tournefortii . Pages 68–72 in Bossard, C. C., Randall, J. M., and Hoshovsky, M. C., eds. Invasive Plants of California's Wildlands. Berkeley, CA University of California Press.Google Scholar
Moyes, A. B., Witter, M. S., and Gamon, J. A. 2005. Restoration of native perennials in a California annual grassland after prescribed spring burning and solarization. Restor. Ecol. 13:659–666.Google Scholar
Rice, P. M., Toney, J. C., Bedunah, D. J., and Carlson, C. E. 1997. Plant community diversity and growth form responses to herbicide applications for control of Centaurea maculosa . J. Appl. Ecol. 34:1397–1412.Google Scholar
Sheley, R. L. and Denny, M. K. 2006. Community response of nontarget species to herbicide application and removal of the nonindigenous invader Potentilla recta L. West. N. Am. Nat. 66:55–63.Google Scholar
Simmons, M. T., Windhager, S., Power, P., Lott, J., Lyons, R. K., and Schwope, C. 2007. Selective and non-selective control of invasive plants: the short-term effects of growing-season prescribed fire, herbicide, and mowing in two Texas prairies. Restor. Ecol. 15:662–669.Google Scholar
Steers, R. J. and Allen, E. B. 2010. Post-fire control of invasive plants promotes native recovery in a burned desert shrubland. Restor. Ecol. 18(S2):334–343.Google Scholar
Suazo, A. A., Spencer, J. E., Engel, E. C., and Abella, S. R. 2012. Responses of native and non-native Mojave Desert winter annuals to soil disturbance and water additions. Biol. Invasions 14:215–227.Google Scholar
Trader, M. R., Brooks, M. L., and Draper, J. V. 2006. Seed production by the non-native Brassica tournefortii (African mustard) along desert roadsides. Madroño 53:313–320.Google Scholar
Wilbur, H. D. and Hufbauer, R. A. 2012. Timing control efforts to limit seed set of common mullein (Verbascum thapsus). Invasive Plant Sci. Manag 5:390–394.Google Scholar
[WRCC] Western Regional Climate Center. 2013. Western U.S. Historical Climate Summaries. http://www.wrcc.dri.edu/. Accessed February 18, 2013.Google Scholar
Zaady, E., Levacov, R., and Shachak, M. 2004. Application of the herbicide, Simazine, and its effect on soil surface parameters and vegetation in a patchy desert landscape. Arid Land Res. Manag. 18:397–410.Google Scholar