Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:27:21.171Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cinematic Revolution: Cosmopolitan Alter-cinema of Pre-revolutionary Iran

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Golbarg Rekabtalaei
Golbarg Rekabtalaei*
Affiliation:
The Department of Near and Middle Eastern Civilizations, at the University of Toronto
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the late 1950s, when Iran was witness to the withering away of social norms and everyday practices concomitant with the country's rapid urbanization, a group of young Iranian film directors embarked upon a new cinematic trend, in attempts to screen the ethereal quotidian of Iranian life. Defining itself against what was perceived to be the “cheap” and “repetitive” commercial “Film Farsi” industry of the time, this alternative (alter-)cinema fused the local and global, by incorporating international cinematic elements in socially and politically conscious national films, and projecting them on local and international screens. Problematizing a homogeneous conception of historical time that subsumes the history of cinema into a conventionalized grand narrative of the Iranian 1979 revolution, this article works with a conception of heterogeneous historical time that first interrogates cinematic temporality autonomously and then in relation to the political history of Iran, especially the events of the 1978–79 revolution. This article explores how the distinct cosmopolitan alter-cinema of pre-revolutionary Iran was born from a cinematic rupture in the 1950s, prompted by series of critiques and professional expectations that colored the attention paid to the vernacular and quotidian in film production.

Type
Articles
Information
Iranian Studies , Volume 48 , Issue 4 , July 2015 , pp. 567 - 589
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 The International Society for Iranian Studies

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

“24th Berlin International Film Festival June 21–July 2, 1974.” Berlinale. Berlin International Film Festival. http://www.berlinale.de/en/archiv/jahresarchive/1974/01_jahresblatt_1974/01_Jahresblatt_1974.htmlGoogle Scholar
Afshar, Mahmud. “Sīnamā dar Īrān: yā yikī az Madrisih-hā-yi (Fannī) va ‘Amalī-yi Fisād” (Cinema in Iran: or One of the Technical and Practical Schools of Corruption). Āyandih, no. 4 (1338 [1959]): 227–242.Google Scholar
Akramī, Jamshīd. “Jahd dar Gharībih Namāyī” [Efforts in defamiliarization]. Rūdakī 37–38 (Ābān–Āzar 1353 [Oct.–Nov. 1974]): 23–24.Google Scholar
Akramī, Jamshīd. “Mīrās-i Tabāh Kunandih” [Corroding legacy]. Rūdakī 37–38 (Ābān–Āzar 1353 [Oct.–Nov. 1974]): 21–22.Google Scholar
Aʻlāyī, Manūchihr. “Sīnamā yā Buzurgtarīn ‘Ᾱmil-i Fisād-i Akhlāgh” [Cinema or the most significant cause of moral corruption]. Parcham-i Islām (Urdībihisht 20, 1325 [May 10, 1946]): 1, 4.Google Scholar
Al-i Ahmad, Jalal. Occidentosis: A Plague from the West. Translated by Robert, Campbell. Berkeley, CA: Mizan Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Amīr-ʻAlāyī, Shamsuddīn. “Āsār-i Matbūʻāt va Adabīyyāt-i Sīnamā va Tiātr va Mud dar Irtikāb-i Jināyāt” [The impact of publications and cinema literature and theatre and fashion in the committing of crimes]. Majmū’ah-yi Huqūqī 6, no. 4 (Tīr 31, 1321 [July 22, 1942]): 139–146.Google Scholar
Appadurai, Arjun. Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1996.Google Scholar
“Asāsnāmih va Nizāmnāmih-yi Anjuman-i Nivīsandigān-i Sīnamā va Tiātr-i Īrān” [The Society for Iranian Cinema and Theater Writers]. Sitārih-yi Sīnamā 3, no. 81 (Mihr 8, 1336 [Sept. 30, 1956]): 11.Google Scholar
ʻAttār, ʻAbdulrizā. “Shawhar-i Āhū Khānum: Fīlmī Tahsīn Bar-angīz” [Mrs. Ahu's husband: an admirable film]. Nigīn 43 (Azar 30, 1347 [Dec. 21, 1968]): 59–60, 70.Google Scholar
“Buzurgtarīn Fistīvāl-i Sīnamāyī-yi Sāl az Shāhkār-hā-yi Buzurg-i Fīlm-hā-yi Ītālīyāyī” [The biggest cinema festival of the year (showcasing) the great masterpieces of Italian films]. Sitārih-yi Sīnamā 16 (Mihr 28, 1333 [Oct. 20, 1954]): 25.Google Scholar
Deroo, Neil. “The Future Matters: Protention as More Than Inverse Retention.” Bulletin d'analyse phénoménologique 4, no. 7 (2008): 1–18.Google Scholar
“Dukhtarī az Shīrāz” [A girl from Shiraz]. Sitārih-yi Sīnamā 7 (Tīr 2, 1333 [June 23, 1954]): 7.Google Scholar
Esfandiary, Shahab. Iranian Cinema and Globalization: National, Transnational, and Islamic Dimensions. Chicago: Intellect, University of Chicago Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Farahī, Farhang. “Jumʻih Bāzār-i Sīnamā-yi Fīlm-Fārsī” [The Friday bazaar of Film-Farsi]. Nigīn 44 (Day 30, 1347 [Jan. 20, 1969]): 25–26, 62.Google Scholar
Forslund, Bengt. “Matbūʻāt-i Jahān va Sivvumīn Jashnvārih-yi Jahānī-yi Fīlm-i Tihrān” [World press and the Third International Film Festival of Tehran]. Sīnamā 54, no. 18 (Murdād–Shahrīvar 1354 [Aug.–Sept. 1975]): 65–69.Google Scholar
Ghadīmī, Hūshang. “Intiqād-i Fīlm-hā-yi Haftih: Āghā Muhammad Khān-i Qājār” [A critique of this week's films: Agha Muhammad Khan of Qajar]. Sitārih-yi Sīnamā 21 (Bahman 1333 [Jan. 1955]): 17.Google Scholar
Ghaffārī, Farrukh. “Sīnamā-yi Īrān az Dīrūz tā Imrūz” [Iran's cinema from yesterday to today]. Irān Nāmih 14, no. 3 (Tābistān 1375 [Summer 1996]): 341–352.Google Scholar
Gillett, John. “Dar Hāshīyih-yi Jashnvārih-yi Kan: Dar Intizār-i Zuhūr-i Āsārī Buzurg az Sīnamā-yi Irān” [On the sidelines of the Cannes Film Festival: in anticipation of great works from Iranian cinema]. Sīnamā 54, no. 18 (Murdād–Shahrīvar 1354 [Aug.–Sept. 1975]): 60Google Scholar
Gourgouris, Stathis. “Philosophy and Sublimation.” Thesis Eleven 49, no. 1 (May 1997): 31–43. doi: 10.1177/0725513697049000004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gow, Christopher. From Iran to Hollywood: and Some Places in-Between. London: I. B. Tauris, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Gulih, Mahbūb-i Sīnamāgarān-i Irān” [Gulah, popular among Iranian filmmakers]. Sīnamā 54, no. 21 (Day–Bahman 1354 [Dec.–Jan. 1975–76]): 8.Google Scholar
Hakamīzādih, ʻAlī Akbar. “Tablīghāt” [Propaganda]. Humāyūn 7 (Farvardīn 1314 [March 1934]): 31–32.Google Scholar
Hamadānī, ʻAlī. “Hamāsih-yi Qaysar va Sīm-i Ākhar” [The epic of Qaysar and madness]. Nigīn 56 (Day 1348 [Dec. 1969]): 13, 68.Google Scholar
Hansen, Miriam. “Vernacular Modernism: Tracking Cinema on a Global Scale.” In World Cinemas: Transnational Perspectives, edited by Ďurovičová, Nataša and Newman, Kathleen, 287–314. New York: Routledge, 2010.Google Scholar
Higson, Andrew. “The Concept of National Cinema.” Screen 30, no. 4 (1989): 36–46. doi: 10.1093/screen/30.4.36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Il Tempo.” Sinama 54, no. 21 (Day–Bahman 1354 [Dec.–Jan. 1975]): 8.Google Scholar
Ipakchī, Dāvūd. “Nigāhī bih Sīnamā-yi Javān-i Īrān dar Pārīs” [A look at the young Iranian cinema in Paris]. Nigīn 99 (Murdād 1352 [Aug. 1973]): 48–50.Google Scholar
ʻIshqī, Bihzād. “Sīnamā-yi Jāmiʻih Garā” >[Socially oriented cinema]. Rūdakī 48 (Mihr 1353 [Sept.–Oct. 1974]): 14–17.Google Scholar
ʻIshqī, Bihzād. “Sīnamā-yi Zarūrat” [Cinema of necessity]. Rūdakī 39–40 (Day–Bahman 1353 [Dec. 1974–Jan. 1975]): 36–39.Google Scholar
ʻIshqī, Bihzād. “Tazād-hā-yi Ijtimāʻī dar Fīlm-i Pustchī” [Social conflict in the film, The postman]. Nigīn 90 (Aban 1351 [Oct. 1972]): 48–49, 55.Google Scholar
“Jashnvārih-yi Fīlm-hā-yi Īrānī dar Āmrīcā” [The Festival of Iranian Films in America]. Sīnamā 5, no. 24 (Tīr/Murdād 2535 [July/Aug. 1975]): 57.Google Scholar
“Kānūn-i Millī-yi Hunar va Sīnih Kulūb” [National Art Association and Cine-Club]. Payk-i Sīnamā 9 (Āzar 6, 1333 [Nov. 27, 1954]): 22–23.Google Scholar
Kasravi, Ahmad. Āyīn. 1932.Google Scholar
Kāvūsī, Hūshang. “Gandāb-i Rūbirū” [The Wasteland Ahead]. Nigīn 44 (Day 30, 1347 [Jan. 20, 1969]: 6.Google Scholar
Kāvūsī, Hūshang. “Guftih-hā va Nāguftih-hā: Man Tājiram, Taw Tājirī, Ū Tājir Ast” [The said and unsaid matters: I am a merchant, you are a merchant, he/she is a merchant]>. Nigīn 55 (Azar 1348 [Nov. 1969]): 5–6.Google Scholar
Khāchīkīyān, Samuel. “Chigūnih Mītavān Navāqis-i Fīlm-hā-yi Fārsī rā Rafʻ Kard?” [How can the flaws of Persian films be rectified?] Sitārih-yi Sīnamā 24 (Day 22, 1333 [Jan. 12, 1955]): 14.Google Scholar
Khāwjih-Nūrī, Ibrāhīm. “Tarh-i Buzurg barāy-i Sīnamā-yi Īrān” [A big plan for the cinema of Iran]. Masāil-i Īrān 43 (Isfand 1345 [Feb. 1966]): 13–15.Google Scholar
“Kūshish dar Rāh-i Namāyish-i Fīlm-hā-yi Khūb-i Sīnamāyī” [Attempts in screening good cinema films]. Nigīn 56 (Day 1348 [Dec. 1969]): 49.Google Scholar
McGee, Peter. Cinema, Theory and Political Responsibility in Contemporary Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naficy, Hamid. “Islamising Film Culture in Iran: A Post-Khatami Update.” In The New Iranian Cinema: Politics, Representation, and Identity, edited by Tapper, Richard, 26–65. London: I. B. Tauris, 2012.Google Scholar
Naficy, Hamid. The Industrializing Years, 1941–1978. Vol. 2 of A Social History of Iranian Cinema. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
“Naghd-i Fīlm dar Irān: Guzārishī az Yik Guftugū, bā Shirkat-i Nasīb Nasībī, … Hūshang Hisāmī, … Basīr Nasībī, … Mīnāsīyān” [Film critique in Iran: report of a discussion, with the participation of Nasīb Nasībī, … Hūshang Hisāmī, … Basīr Nasībī, … Mīnāsīyān]. Nigīn 54 (Ābān 1348 [Oct. 1969]): 60–64.Google Scholar
Nasībī, Basīr. “Fīlm va Sīnamā va Fīlmfārsī” [Film and cinema and Film-Farsi]. Nigīn 39 (Murdād 31, 1347 [Aug. 22, 1968]): 10–11, 67.Google Scholar
Nasībī, Nasīb. “Fīlm-i Sarzanish-i Rasmī” [The film, Reprimand]. Nigīn 43 (Āzar 1347 [Dec. 1968]): 71.Google Scholar
Nūryānī, Nusratullāh. “Sīnamā va Andīshihih-yi Mardum” [Cinema and the public's opinion]. Āyīn-i Islām (Isfand 23, 1325 [March 14, 1946]): 12.Google Scholar
“Rāhzan” [The bandit]. Sitārih-yi Sīnamā 21 (Bahman 1333 [Jan. 1955]): 12.Google Scholar
Rafīʻ, H. “Dar Justujūy-i Yik Sīnamā-yi Sālim va Tafakkur-Angīz” [In search of a healthy and thought-provoking cinema]. Nigīn 78 (Ābān 1350 [Oct. 1971]): 34–35.Google Scholar
“Rājiʻ bih ʻAvāriz-i Fīlm-hā-ye Fārsī Chih Nazarī Dārīd?” [What do you think about the taxes on Persian films?] Payk-i Sīnamāyī-yi Nijāt 7 (Ābān 8, 1333 [Oct. 30, 1954]): 20.Google Scholar
Razavī, Zīyā. “Fistīvāl-i Sīnamāyī-i Birlīn, 1972” [Berlin Film Festival, 1972]. Kāvih (Munich) 41–42 (Pāyīz va Zimistān 1350 [Fall and Winter 1972]): 304.Google Scholar
Sābirī, Īraj. “Safar-i Harf bā Masūd Kīmīyāyī” [A journey of words with Masūd Kīmīyāyī]. Sīnamā 56–58, no. 33 (Day–Bahman 1356 [Jan.–Feb. 1978]): 10.Google Scholar
Sābirī, Īraj. “Sāyih-hā-yi Buland: Chun va Chirā Bā Bahman Farmān-Arā” [The tall shadows: question and answer with Bahman Farman-Ara]. Sīnamā 56–58, no. 36 (Shahrīvar 1357 [Sept. 1978]): 29.Google Scholar
Sadr, Hamid Reza. Iranian Cinema: A Political History. New York: I. B. Tauris, 2006.Google Scholar
Safā, Parī. “Nishastī bā Kāmrān Shīrdil” [A conversation with Kamran Shirdel]. Rūdakī 39–40 (Day–Bahman 1353 [Dec. 1974–Jan. 1975]): 10–13.Google Scholar
“Screen International: Īnjā Suhbat az Buland Parvāzī Ast” [Screen International: here, there is word of high expectations]. Sīnamā 54, no. 21 (Day–Bahman 1354 [Dec. 1974–Jan. 1975]): 4–5.Google Scholar
Shaftī, Hūshang. “Guzārishī Kūtāh az Chāhārumīn Jashnvārih-yi Āsīyāyī-yi ‘Tāshkand’” [A short report on the fourth “Tashkent” Asian festival]. Sīnamā 55, no. 24 (Tīr–Murdād 2535 [June–July 1976]): 65.Google Scholar
Shīravānī, Hasan. “Sanʻat va Hunar-i Fīlmbardārī dar Īrān” [The industry and art of video-recording in Iran]. Sitārih-yi Sīnamā 18 (Ābān 19, 1333 [Nov. 10, 1954]): 6–7, 11.Google Scholar
“Sīnamā-hā-yi Jadīd, Ibtikārāt-i Tāzih” [New cinemas: new initiatives]. Sitārih-yi Sīnamā 3, no. 82 (Mihr 15, 1335 [Oct. 7, 1956]): 2.Google Scholar
“Sīnamā-yi Būmī” [Indigenous cinema]. Rūdakī 37–38 (Ābān–Āzar 1353 [Oct.–Nov. 1974]): 21.Google Scholar
Tapper, , Richard, . The New Iranian Cinema: Politics, Representation and Identity. London: I.B. Tauris, 2002.Google Scholar
“Taqlīl-i ʻAvāriz-i Fīlm-hā-ye Fārsī Muvāzī Bā Taqlīl-i ʻAvāriz-i Fīkm-hā-yi Khārigī Bāyad Sūrat Bigīrad” [The tax reduction on Iranian films must be implemented parallel to the tax reduction on foreign films]. Sitārih-yi Sīnamā 3, no. 79 (Shahrīvar 25, 1335 [Sept. 16, 1956]): 2.Google Scholar
“Tehran International Film Festival.” Variety (Archive: 1905–2000) 283, no. 2 (May 19, 1976): 77. http://search.proquest.com/docview/1285983144?accountid=14771Google Scholar
Tūrānī, Bihrūz. “Fīlm-i ‘Bunbast’ Asar-i Parvīz Sayyād dar Jashnvārih-yi Muskaw” [The movie “The dead-end” by Parviz Sayyad in the Moscow festival]. Bunyād 6 (Shahrīvar 2536 [Sept. 1977]): 64.Google Scholar
Vahīdī, Gītī. “Ārāmish dar Huzūr-i Fājiʻih” [Tranquility in the presence of catastrophe]. Nigīn 96 (Urdībihisht 1352 [April 1973]): 55–56.Google Scholar
“Vazīrnīā, , Mahdī, . “Sinamā va Asarāt-i ān dar Javānān-i Irānī” [Cinema and its effects on the Iranian youth]. Maktab-i Mām 11 (Bahman 1348 [Feb. 1969]): 18–21.Google Scholar
Walker, Alexander. “Ingilistān, Firistandih-ye Tilivīzīyunī-ye B.B.C.: Jashnvārih-ye Chāhārrum, Fursatī Barā-ye Īrānī-hā-ye Javān” [England, BBC television channel: the fourth festival, an opportunity for Iranian youth]. Sīnamā 55, no. 22 (Farvardīn 2535 [March 1976]): 55–57.Google Scholar
Wang, Ben. The Sublime Figure of History: Aesthetics and Politics in Twentieth-Century China. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Weiler, A. H. “The Screen; ‘A Simple Event,’ From Iran, at Modern Art.” New York Times, April 8, 1975. http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.htmlres=F30814FF3858157493CAA9178FD85F418785F9Google Scholar
“Yik Dirām-i Muhayyij-i Vāqaʻyi: Ākharin Shab” [A real drama-thriller: the last night]. Sitārih-yi Sīnamā 20 (Day 1333 [Jan. 1955]): 9.Google Scholar