Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T21:53:06.288Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Beginnings of Word Order Change in the Arabic Dialects of Southern Iran in Contact with Persian: A Preliminary Study of Data from Four Villages in Bushehr and Hormozgan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Dina El Zarka
Affiliation:
University of Graz

Abstract

This preliminary study explores the hypothesis that Arabic dialects spoken on the Iranian side of the Persian Gulf exhibit the beginnings of contact-induced shift in word order from VO to OV. Although the basic VO order is still stable, there is some variation even in this very limited data set. Specifically two phenomena point to a change in progress: clause-final copulae and auxiliaries that are placed after the lexical verb, lending further evidence to the observation that a clause-final copula is an areal feature of western Asia. The study also investigates semantic and pragmatic factors that influence word order choice, pointing to a strong effect of information structure in terms of narrow focus and theme-rheme partition. Furthermore, the study also reveals an effect of semantic role, specifically as far as the preferred placement of goals and recipients in post-verbal position is concerned.

Type
Aramaic and Arabic linguistic islands
Copyright
Copyright © Association For Iranian Studies, Inc 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anonby, Erik, Taheri-Ardali, Mortaza & Hayes, AmosThe Atlas of the Languages of Iran (ALI): A Research Overview”, Iranian Studies, 52/1–2 (2019): 199230. DOI:10.1080/00210862.2019.1573135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aoun, Joseph E., Benmamoun, Elabbas, and Choueiri, Lina. The Syntax of Arabic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Asbaghi, Asya. Persische Lehnwörter im Arabischen. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 1988.Google Scholar
Behaghel, Otto. Deutsche Syntax. Vol. 4. Heidelberg: Carl Winters Universitätsbuchhandlung, 1932.Google Scholar
Benmamoun, Elabbas. Agreement and Cliticization in Arabic Varieties from Diachronic and Synchronic Perspectives Al-'Arabiyya. Vol. 44/45, 137150, 20112012.Google Scholar
Brustad, Kristen. The Syntax of Spoken Arabic: A Comparative Study of Moroccan, Egyptian, Syrian, and Kuwaiti Dialects. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Büring, Daniel.Towards a Typology of Focus Realization.” In Information Structure, ed. Zimmermann, Malte and Féry, Caroline, 177205. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L.Givenness, Contrastiveness, Definiteness, Subjects, Topics and Point of View” In Subject and topic, ed. Li, Charles, 2556. New York: Academic Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L. Discourse, Consciousness and Time: The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Dahlgren, Sven-Olof. Word Order in Arabic. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis, 1998.Google Scholar
Dahlgren, Sven-Olof.Word Order.” In Encyclopedia of Arabic Language and Linguistics. Vol. 4, 725736. Leiden: Brill, 2009.Google Scholar
El Zarka, Dina.On the Interaction of Information Structure and Prosody: The Case of Egyptian Arabic.” PhD diss., Graz, 2013.Google Scholar
El Zarka, Dina, and Schuppler, Barbara. “On the Interplay of Pragmatic and Formal Factors in the Prosodic Realization of Themes in Egyptian Arabic.” Grazer Linguistische Studien 90 (Autumn 2018): 33106. doi:10.25364/04.45:2018.90.2.Google Scholar
Féry, Caroline.Focus as Prosodic Alignment.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 31, no. 3 (2013): 683734. doi:10.1007/s11049-013-9195-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Firbas, Jan.On the Concept of Communicative Dynamism in the Theory of Functional Sentence Perspective.” Studia Minora Facultatis Philosophicae Universitatis Brunensis A 19 (1971): 135144.Google Scholar
Gazsi, Dénes.Arabic-Persian Language Contact.” In The Semitic Languages: An International Handbook, ed. Weninger, Stefan, 10151021. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2011.Google Scholar
Gazsi, Dénes.From Arabia to Persia and Back: Code-switching among the Āl ʽAlī Tribe in the UAE and Iran.” In Arabic in Contact, ed. Manfredi, Stefano and Tosco, Mauro, 314330. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy.The Pragmatics of Word-Order: Predictability, Importance and Attention.” In Studies in Syntactic Typology, ed. Hammond, Michael, Moravcsik, Edith, and Wirth, Jessica, 243284. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gundel, Jeanette. The Role of Topic and Comment in Linguistic Theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club, 1976.Google Scholar
Gussenhoven, Carlos.Focus, Mode and the Nucleus.” Journal of Linguistics 19 (1983): 377417. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700007799Google Scholar
Haig, Geoffrey.Verb-Goal (VG) Word Order in Kurdish and Neo-Aramaic: Typological and Areal Considerations.” In Neo-Aramaic and Its Linguistic Context, ed. Khan, Geoffrey and Napiorkowska, Lidia, 407425. Piscataway, NJ: Gorgias Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Haig, Geoffrey.Western Asia: East Anatolia as a Transition Zone.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Areal Linguistics, ed. Hickey, Raymond, 396423. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haig, Geoffrey.The Grammaticalization of Object Pronouns: Why Differential Object Indexing is an Attractor State.” Linguistics 56, no. 4 (2018): 781818. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/ling-2018-0011Google Scholar
Haig, Geoffrey, and Khan, Geoffrey. “Introduction.” In The Languages and Linguistics of Western Asia: An Areal Perspective, ed. Haig, Geoffrey and Khan, Geoffrey, 130. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2019.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A.K.Notes on Transitivity and Theme in English.” Parts 1 and 2. Journal of Linguistics 3 (1967): 3781, 199–244. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700012949CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holes, Clive.Word Order and Textual Function in Gulf Arabic.” In Information Structure in Spoken Arabic, ed. Owens, Jonathan and Elgibali, Alaa, 6174. London: Routledge, 2010.Google Scholar
Holes, Clive. Dialect, Culture, and Society in Eastern Arabia: Vol. III: Phonology, Morphology, Syntax, Style. Leiden: Brill, 2016.Google Scholar
Ingham, Bruce. Najdi Arabic: Central Arabian. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1994. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/alltitles/docDetail.action?docID=10488448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahnemuyipour, Arsalan.Syntactic Categories and Persian Stress.” Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 21, no. 2 (2003): 333379. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1023330609827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kálmán, Lázsló, Prószéky, Gábor, Nádasdy, Ádám, and Kálmán C, György. “Hocus, Focus, and Verb Types in Hungarian Infinitive Constructions.” In Topic, Focus and Configurationality, ed. Abraham, Werner and Meij, Sjaak de, 139142. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1986.Google Scholar
Khan, Geoffrey.The Neo-Aramaic Dialects of Western Iran.” In The Languages and Linguistics of Western Asia: An Areal Perspective, ed. Haig, Geoffrey and Khan, Geoffrey, 481532. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2019.Google Scholar
É.Kiss, Katalin.Identificational Focus versus Information Focus.” Language 74, no. 2 (1998): 245273. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/lan.1998.0211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladd, Dwight Robert. Intonational Phonology. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud. Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leitner, Bettina.Clause-Final Copulae in Arabic.” Paper presented at the 13th International AIDA Conference at Akaki Tsereteli State University, Kutaisi, June 10–13, 2019.Google Scholar
Leitner, Bettina, forthcoming. “Contact-Induced Change in Khuzestan Arabic.” In Arabic and Contact-Induced Change: A Handbook. Studies in Diversity Linguistics, ed. Lucas, Christopher and Manfredi, Stefano. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Leitner, Bettina, Anonby, Erik, Taheri-Ardali, Mortaza, and Zarka, Dina El, forthcoming. A First Description of Arabic on the South Coast of Iran: The Arabic Dialect of Bandar Moqām, Hormozgan.Google Scholar
Matras, Yaron.The Borrowability of Structural Categories.” In Grammatical Borrowing in Cross-Linguistic Perspective, ed. Matras, Yaron and Sakel, Jeanette, 3173. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2007.Google Scholar
Matras, Yaron, and Shabibi, Maryam. “Grammatical Borrowing in Khuzistani Arabic.” In Grammatical Borrowing in Cross-Linguistic Perspective, ed. Matras, Yaron and Sakel, Jeanette, 137149. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2007.Google Scholar
Nadjmabadi, Shahnaz.‘Arabisiert’ oder ‘Iranisiert’? Siedlungsgeschichte in der iranischen Provinz Hormozgān am Persischen Golf.” Die Welt des Islams 45, no. 1 (2005): 108150. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/1570060053628043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Procházka, Stephan.The Arabic Dialects of Eastern Anatolia.” In The Languages and Linguistics of Western Asia: An Areal Perspective, ed. Haig, Geoffrey and Khan, Geoffrey, 159189. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2019.Google Scholar
Procházka, Stephan.The Arabic dialects of Northern Iraq.” In The Languages and Linguistics of Western Asia: An Areal Perspective, ed. Haig, Geoffrey and Khan, Geoffrey, 243266. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2019.Google Scholar
Procházka, Stephan, forthcoming. “Arabic in Iraq, Syria, and Southern Turkey.” In Arabic and Contact-Induced Change: A Handbook, ed. Lucas, Christopher and Manfredi, Stefano. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Ratcliffe, Robert R.Bukhara Arabic: A Metatypized Dialect of Arabic in Central Asia.” In Linguistic Convergence and Areal Diffusion: Case Studies from Iranian, Semitic and Turkic, ed. Csató, Éva Ágnes, Isaksson, Bo, and Jahani, Carina, 141159, London: RoutledgeCurzon, 2005.Google Scholar
Sadat Tehrani, Nima.The Intonational Grammar of Persian.” PhD diss., University of Manitoba, 2007.Google Scholar
Seeger, Ulrich.Khalaf: Ein arabisches Dorf in Khorasan.” In Philologisches und Historisches zwischen Anatolien und Sokotra: Analecta Semitica In Memoriam Alexander Sima, ed. Arnold, Werner, Jursa, Michael, Müller, Walter W. and Procházka, Stephan, 307317. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2009.Google Scholar
Seeger, Ulrich.Zum Verhältnis der zentralasiatischen arabischen Dialekte mit einem bisher unveröffentlichten Text aus Südchorasan.” In Nicht nur mit Engelszungen: Beiträge zur semitischen Dialektologie: Festschrift für Werner Arnold zum 60. Geburtstag, ed. Kuty, Renaud, Seegers, Ulrich and Talay, Shabo, 313322. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2013.Google Scholar
Taheri-Ardali, Mortaza, Rahmani, Hamed, and Xu, Yi. “The Perception of Prosodic Focus in Persian.” Speech Prosody 7 (2014): 515519. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21437/SpeechProsody.2014-90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vallduví, Enric. The Informational Component. New York: Garland, 1992.Google Scholar
Van der Wal Anonby, Christina.Kumzari.” In The Languages and Linguistics of Western Asia: An Areal Perspective, ed. Haig, Geoffrey and Khan, Geoffrey, 625658. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2019.Google Scholar
Versteegh, Kees.Contact and the Development of Arabic.” In The Handbook of Language Contact, ed. Hickey, Raymond, 634651. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Versteegh, Kees. The Arabic Language. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Wedgwood, Daniel. Shifting the Focus: From Static Structures to the Dynamics of Interpretation. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, William. A Grammar of the Arabic Language. 3rd edition. Beirut: Librairie du Liban, 1974.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Gerit.Uzbekistan Arabic.” In Encyclopedia of Arabic Language and Linguistics. Vol. 4, 612623. Leiden: Brill, 2009.Google Scholar