Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:41:25.555Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Formation of Islamic Art. By Oleg Grabar. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1973. 233 pages; 131 illustrations.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Priscilla P. Soucek*
Affiliation:
Department of the History of Art of the University of Michigan

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review and Comment
Copyright
Copyright © Association For Iranian Studies, Inc 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Hamilton, R. W. Khirbat al-Mafjar, Oxford, 1959, pp. 98-103Google Scholar, fig. 52, p1. LV; L,5; CVII.

2. Ibid., fig. 50.

3. Ibid., pp. 92-98, p1. LVI, CVIII.

4. Ibid., pp. 63-67, figs. 25, 26, p1s. LIII, LIV, LVI.

5. Jarīr al-Ṭabarī, Muḥammad ibn Jāmi˓ al-Bayān, Cairo, 1954, vol. 22, pp. 71-72.Google Scholar

6. Aḥmad al-Muqaddasī, Muḥammad b. Aḥsan al-Taqāsīm fi Ma˓rifat al-Aqālīm, ed. de Goeje, 2nd ed., Leiden, 1906, p. 444: 6-10.Google Scholar

7. Ṭāhir al-Maqdisī, Mutahhar ibn Kitāb al-Bad’ wa al-Tā'rīkh, Paris, 1903, vol. III, p. 106.Google Scholar

8. Muḥammad Bal˓amī, Tā'rīkh-i Ṭabarī, trans. Zotenberg, Paris, 1958, vol. I, p. 442.Google Scholar

9. Aḥmad al-Ḥamdānī, al-Ḥasan ibn The Antiquities of South Arabia, trans. Faris, N. Princeton, 1938, p. 50.Google Scholar

10. ˓Alī Al-Harawī, Kitāb al-Ishārāt ilā Ma˓rifat al-Ziyārāt, ed. Sourdel-Thomine, J. Damascus, 1953, p. 21.Google Scholar

11. Ṭabarī, Jāmi˓ al-Bayān, vol. 22, p. 69.Google Scholar

12. Ṭabarī, Tā'rīkh al-Rusul wa al-Mulūk, ed. de Goeje, Leiden, 1881-82, vol. I, pt. 2, p. 575:2-11.Google Scholar

13. Ettinghausen, R. From Byzantium to Sasanian Iran and the Islamic World, Leiden, 1972, pp. 11-16.Google Scholar

14. ˓Alī b. al-Ḥusain al-Mas˓ūdī, Murūj al-Dhahab, ed. Pavet de Courteille Barbier de Meynard, Paris, 1914, vol. 4, p. 23.Google Scholar

15. Ibn Isḥāq/ Ibn Hishām, Sīrat al-Nabī, Cairo, 1971, Vol. II, p. 6.Google Scholar

16. Dā'īd al-Dīnawarī, Aḥmad ibn Akhbār al-Ṭiwāl, Cairo, 1970, p. 19:9-10.Google Scholar

17. Ṭabarī, Tā'rīkh, vol. I, pt. 2, p. 573:1-2, 575:11 576:2.Google Scholar

18. For a canopy supported by angels, see Fares, B.Figures Magiques,” fig. 2, in Aus der Welt der Islamischen Kunst, ed. Ettinghausen, R. Berlin, 1959Google Scholar; for a bird canopy see Stchoukine, I. Les Peintures des Manuscrits Safavis, Paris, 1959, p1. LXV.Google Scholar

19. Tabarī gives two versions of this story--in both cases Solomon loses the ring because he entrusts it to one of his wives who gives it to the usurper. The ring is eventually recovered from the stomach of a fish. Tā'rīkh, vol. I, pt. 2, pp. 589:18, 594:3.Google Scholar

20. For a detailed description, see Abū ˓Alī al-Faḍl al-Tabarsī, Majma˓ al-Bayān, Cairo, 1955, vol. 22, pp. 191-192.Google Scholar The figure of Solomon (discussed by B. Fares) cited in note 18 is supported by lions. See also Binyon, L. Wilkinson, J. V. S. Gray, B. Persian Miniature Painting, Oxford, 1933, p1. XVI B.Google Scholar

21. Miskawaih, Ibn Tajārib al-Umam, ed. and trans. Amedroz, H. and Margoliouth, D. Oxford, 1921, vol. I, pp. 162-163, vol. IV, pp. 182-183.Google Scholar

22. Mīr Muḥammad ibn Sayyīd Burhān al-Dīn Khwāvand Shāh known as Mirkhwānd, Tā'rīkh Rawzat al-Ṣafā, Tehran, 1339, vol. IV, p. 154.Google Scholar