Article contents
Persian Local Histories: Views from the Wings
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 January 2022
Extract
The history of Iran is still told very much in terms of events on center stage. A common enough lament: the intrigues at court, the deeds—edifying or otherwise—of the ruler and his entourage, the marching of armies and squashing of revolts, the rise and fall of dynasties, these seem to be the main stuff of history. When recognized for what it is, the tossing of waves, we blame the sources for the fact that we can't see below the stormy surface. There is some truth in this, of course; the main narrative histories are notoriously palace-centered or, later, camp-followers. The regions of Iran tend to come into focus only when they are, in fact, briefly transformed into centers. An example of this is Sistan, one of the few provinces to be the subject of detailed modern studies. Even then, it tends to be the same sort of story, writ small.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Association For Iranian Studies, Inc 2000
References
1. See the work of Bosworth, C.E., Sistan Under the Arabs (Rome, 1968)Google Scholar and The History of the Saffarids of Sistan (Costa Mesa, Calif, and New York, 1994).Google Scholar
2. Subtitled A Study in Medieval Islamic Social History (Cambridge, Mass., 1972).Google Scholar
3. Stephens, W.B., Sources for English Local History (Cambridge, 1981), 1.Google Scholar
4. Most systematically by Elisabeth M.C. Van Houts, Local and Regional Chronicles, fasc. 74 in Typologie des sources du moyen âge occidental, ed. Noël, R. (Turnhout, 1995)Google Scholar, mainly with regard to Continental Europe.
5. Gransden, A., Historical Writing in England c. 550-c. 1307 (London, 1974), esp. 269–95, 519-21Google Scholar [quotations at 269].
6. Hay, D., Annalists and Historians. Western Historiography from the Eighth to the Eighteenth Centuries (London, 1977), esp. 78–80, 85-86Google Scholar; Gransden, 508-17; Breisach, E., Historiography. Ancient, Medieval, Modern, 2nd ed. (Chicago & London, 1994), 150–52.Google Scholar Examples could be enormously multiplied.
7. Du Boulay, F.R.H., “The German Town Chronicles,” in Davis, R.H.C. & Wallace-Hadrill, J.M., eds., The Writing of History in the Middle Ages. Essays Presented to Richard William Southern (Oxford, 1981), 448–49.Google Scholar
8. See, e.g., Dahan, S., “The Origin and Development of the Local Histories of Syria,” in Lewis, B. and Holt, P.M., eds., Historians of the Middle East (London, 1962), 108–17.Google Scholar
9. H.A.R. Gibb, ‘Taᶜrīḵẖ,” Encyclopædia of Islam First Edition, Supplement (henceforth EI1) reprinted in Studies on the Civilization of Islam (London, 1962), 120.Google Scholar
10. Rosenthal, F., A History of Muslim Historiography (Leiden, 1968), 160–62.Google Scholar
11. Khalidi, Tarif, Arabic Historical Thought in the Classical Period (Cambridge, 1994), 17ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Tauer, F., “Persian Learned Literature to the End of the 18th Century iv. History and Biography,” in Jahn, K., ed., History of Iranian Literature (Dordrecht, 1968), 438–48.Google Scholar This essentially follows the typology of Storey, C.A., Persian Literature. A Bio-bibliographical Survey, vol. 1, part 1 (reprinted, London, 1970)Google Scholar, under the headings “General History” and “Special Histories of Persia,” arranged by dynasty and geographically. Tauer treats biographical works (taẕkiras) separately. See however A.K.S. Lambton, “Persian Biographical Literature,” in Lewis and Holt, 141-51, where the role of local histories as a form of biographical dictionary is emphasized (143-45).
13. Humphreys, R.S., Islamic History. A Framework for Inquiry, 2nd ed. (London & New York, 1991), 131–32.Google Scholar He regards monographs and dynastic chronicles as separate genres from local histories.
14. E.g. Rosenthal, 129.
15. Tārīkh-i Bayhaq, ed. Bahmanyar, A. (Tehran, 1318/1939), 19–22Google Scholar, distinguishes “well-known histories” from histories of towns and provinces; cf. Parvaneh Pourshariati's article in this volume.
16. al-Safadi, al-Wāfī bi'l-wafayāt, vol. 1, ed. Ritter, H. (Istanbul, 1931), 47–51Google Scholar, translated in Amar, E., “Prolégomènes à l'étude des historiens arabes,” Journal Asiatique 19 (1912): 243–70.Google Scholar
17. See Rosenthal, 433ff.; Cheddadi, A., “Ibn Khaldun, anthropologue ou historien?” in Khaldun, Ibn, Peuples et nations du monde (1) (Paris, 1986)Google Scholar, see esp. 37-39.
18. E.g. al-Safadi, 51ff., tr. Amar, 270ff. Cf. al-Sakhawi's list, based on the allembracing classification of al-Dhahabi, translated in Rosenthal, 388ff. See also Cheddadi, 47-8.
19. Calasso, G., “Universal History, Local History, National History: Recent Theoretical and Methodological Contributions on Islamic Historiography,” in The East and the Meaning of History, University of Rome, Studi orientali vol. 13 (Rome, 1994), 205–8.Google Scholar The same could be said of Ibn al-ᶜAdim's treatment of Aleppo; cf. Morray, D., An Ayyubid Notable and His World. Ibn al-ᶜAdim and Aleppo as Portrayed in His Biographical Dictionary of the People Associated with the City (Leiden, 1994), esp. 13–16.Google Scholar Calasso's arguments are largely in response to the work of Cheddadi noted above.
20. Rosenthal, 457. Cf. Cheddadi, 26-35.
21. Van Houts, 15.
22. Gibb, 120; Humphreys, loc. cit, n. 13; Khalidi, 182-84.
23. Meisami, J.S., Persian Historiography to the End of the Twelfth Century (Edinburgh, 1999), 9–10.Google Scholar She also discusses the Fārsnāmah of Ibn al-Balkhi, Ibn Funduq's Tārīkh-i Bayhaq and Kirmani's ᶜIqd al-ūlā. Narshakhi's Tārīkh-i Bukhārā and Ibn Isfandiyar's Tārīkh-i Ṭabaristān, which she does not cover, do contain more substantial elements of political history.
24. Humphreys, R.S., “Ta˒rīḵẖ (b) The Central and Eastern Lands 950-1500,” EI2, 10: 277–78.Google Scholar Cf. Gibb, 120.
25. Rosenthal, 150-51.
26. Lambton, A. K. S., “Persian Local Histories: the Tradition behind Them and the Assumptions of Their Authors,” in Scarcia Amoretti, B. & Rostagno, L., eds., Yādnāma in Memoria di Alessandro Bausani, University of Rome, Studi orientali vol. 10 (Rome, 1991), 227–38 [quotation at 229].Google Scholar
27. Miller, I., “Local History in Ninth/fifteenth Century Yazd: the Tārīkh-i Jadīd-i Yazd,” Iran 27 (1989): 75–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28. Paul, J., “The Histories of Samarqand,” Studia Iranica 22 (1993): 69–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Pourshariati, P., “Local Histories of Khurasan and the Pattern of Arab Settlement,” Studia Iranica 27 (1998): 48–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8
- Cited by