Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:59:03.066Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

MATHEMATICAL ASPECTS OF EARTH-MOVING LINKED TO HYDRAULIC WORKS IN UR III UMMA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 October 2018

Sergio Alivernini
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper studies mathematical aspects of earthwork projects in the Ur III city of Umma, c.2053–2032 b.c. The main purpose of this paper is to describe the practical procedures involved in moving earth for hydraulic works around Umma. It also shows how Old Babylonian pedagogical “mathematical texts” about earthworks, from the early second millennium b.c., are indebted to the practical procedures adopted by Ur III officials.

Type
Research Article
Information
IRAQ , Volume 80 , December 2018 , pp. 15 - 34
Copyright
Copyright © The British Institute for the Study of Iraq 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alivernini, S. and Greco, A. 2014. “An Ur III tablet concerning garden plots and its ‘sketch’: MVN 22, 31”. Altorientalische Forschungen 41(1): 2–9.Google Scholar
Civil, M. 1994. The Farmer's Instructions. A Sumerian Agricultural Manual. Aula Orientalis Supplementa 5. Barcelona: Editorial AUSA.Google Scholar
Hruška, B. 1988. “Die Bewässerungsanlagen in den altsumerischen Königsinschriften von Lagaš”. Bulletin on Sumerian Agriculture 4: 61–72.Google Scholar
Maaijer De, R. 1998. “Land tenure in Ur III Lagaš” in Haring, B. and De Maaijer, R., eds. Landless and Hungry? Access to Land in Early and Traditional Societies. Proceedings of a Seminar Held in Leiden 20 and 21 June 1996. Leiden: Research School CNWS, School of Asian, African, and Amerindian Studies. pp. 50–73.Google Scholar
Neugebauer, O. and Sachs, A. 1945. Mathematical Cuneiform Texts. American Oriental Series 29. New Haven: American Oriental Society and the American School of Oriental Research.Google Scholar
Oates, J. 1960. “Ur and Eridu, the prehistory”. Iraq 22: 32–50.Google Scholar
Postgate, J. N. 1988. “Introduction”. Bulletin on Sumerian Agriculture 4: vii–xii.Google Scholar
Pournelle, J. R. 2003. “Marshland of Cities: Deltaic Landscapes and the Evolution of Early Mesopotamian Civilization”. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
Pournelle, J. R. 2007. “KLM to CORONA: a bird's eye view of cultural ecology and early Mesopotamian urbanization” in Stone, E., ed., Settlement and Society: Essays Dedicated to Robert McCormick Adams. Los Angeles: UCLA Cotsen Institute. pp. 29–62.Google Scholar
Powell, M. 1976. “The antecedents of Old Babylonian place notation and the early history of Babylonian mathematics”. Historia Mathematica 3: 417–39.Google Scholar
Renger, J. 1990. “Rivers, watercourses and irrigation ditches”. Bulletin on Sumerian Agriculture 5: 31–46.Google Scholar
Robson, E. 1999. Mesopotamian Mathematics, 2100-1600 BC: Technical Constants in Bureaucracy and Education. Oxford Edition of Cuneiform Texts 14. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Robson, E. 2008. Mathematics in Ancient Iraq: A Social History. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rost, S. 2011. “Irrigation management in the Ur III period: a reconsideration based on a case study of the maintenance of the íd-NINA-šè-DU canal of the province of Lagaš” in Selz, G., ed., The Empirical Dimension of Ancient Near Eastern Studies. Wiener Offene Orientalistik 6. Wien: LIT Verlag, pp. 211–69.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, T.J. 2013. “Hydraulic landscapes and irrigation systems of Sumer” in Crawford, H., ed., The Sumerian World. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 33–54.Google Scholar