Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T08:10:09.788Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Nimrud Letters, 1952—Part VII

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 August 2014

H. W. F. Saggs
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Most of the Nimrud letters bearing important identifiable historical allusions have now been published. There still remain, however, about a hundred further documents, of which the letters of the present selection are amongst the best preserved. All the letters here published are from those which fell to the share of the British School of Archaeology at the division of the Nimrud tablets, and it has therefore been possible in every case to collate the copies (made in 1954) against the originals prior to publication.

The letters in this group are connected by no common theme, though there are several which relate to similar situations. In the first two (LXXI and LXXII), and in one of the three letters in Babylonian dialect and script (LXXXI), the writer excuses himself for failure to perform the king's orders; though despite the similarity of subject-matter there is a very different tone in the different letters. Thus, whilst in LXXXI the writer is full of apology, blaming his apparent neglect to communicate with the king upon the shortcomings of his messenger, the attitude of the writer of LXXI shows a sturdy independence of spirit. He declines to do what is asked of him in connection with a horse train, and after quoting what appears to be a proverb — ‘he who answered the king back died’ or ‘he who turned against the king died’ — sums up with the words ‘Now after I have sent a message let the king my lord do what he will do’.

Type
Research Article
Information
IRAQ , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , Spring 1965 , pp. 17 - 32
Copyright
Copyright © The British Institute for the Study of Iraq 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See Iraq XVII, Part 1, pp. 21–50 and Plates IV–IX; XVII, Part 2, pp. 126–154 and Plates XXX–XXXV; XVIII, Part 1, pp. 40–56 and Plates IX–XII; XX, Part 2, pp. 182–212 and Plates XXXVII–XLI; XXI, Part 2, pp. 158–179 and Plates XLIII–XLIX; XXV, Part 1, pp. 70–80 and Plates XI–XIV.

2 The system of transliteration below differs from that previously employed, in the following respects:

x denotes a sign of which traces remain but which is unrecognizable

[x] denotes one sign totally lost

… denotes two or three lost signs

…… denotes lost signs probably in excess of three

……… denotes a line completely lost.