Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-26T08:22:10.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

SELEUCID-PARTHIAN FIGURINES FROM BABYLON IN THE NIPPUR COLLECTION: IMPLICATIONS OF MISATTRIBUTION AND RE-EVALUATING THE CORPUS1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 October 2016

Stephanie M. Langin-Hooper
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article formally documents an important correction to the provenance attribution of three reclining female figurines from Babylon that reside in the Nippur collection at the University of Pennsylvania Museum and were published with that corpus. Few scholars have noticed the misattribution of these figurines, and the problem has not been formally documented for scholarship. Through historiographical analysis of the late nineteenth century Nippur Expeditions and early twentieth century cataloguing and publication of the Nippur corpus, this article reconstructs how and why these three reclining figurines have been continually misassociated with Nippur, and traces the continued impact of this confusion on scholarship's understanding of the Nippur figurine tradition. Most critically, the publication of these three figurines as Nippur objects lent credence to the testimony of an antiquities dealer who sold an additional eight reclining figurines “from Nippur” to the Harvard Semitic Museum; these figurines continue to be regarded as Nippur objects. This article casts doubt upon that provenance. The figurine tradition of Seleucid-Parthian Nippur is reevaluated in light of the absence of securely-provenanced reclining female figurines at that site. An art historical evaluation of these figurines is undertaken, which links these figurines to the general use of hybrid Greek-Babylonian imagery in Seleucid-Parthian figurines, and connects the specific motif of the reclining figure to Greek banqueting imagery. It is proposed that the Nippur community's lack of interest in reclining female figurines can be correlated with a disinterest in pan-Hellenistic ceramic tablewares; together, these lacunae indicate Nippur's non-participation in negotiated Greek-Babylonian banqueting practices. These differences in cross-cultural interaction between Nippur and the neighboring Babylonian communities have not been fully recognized nor explored, due to scholarship's misunderstanding of the use of reclining female figurines at that site. It is this confusion that this article attempts to resolve.

Type
Research Article
Information
IRAQ , Volume 78 , December 2016 , pp. 49 - 77
Copyright
Copyright © The British Institute for the Study of Iraq 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Portions of this research were presented at the American Schools of Oriental Research Annual Meeting (San Francisco, 2011), College Art Association Annual Meeting (Los Angeles, 2012) and the Archaeological Institute of America Annual Meeting (Seattle, 2013). I thank the session chairs, other presenters, and audiences at those meetings for their thoughtful feedback and support. For feedback on drafts of this article, I thank Marian Feldman, Margaret Cool Root, S. Rebecca Martin, Kiersten Neumann, Andrew Hershberger, Allie Terry-Fritsch, and Ruthy Light. Staff at the University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology were critical in facilitating my research on this project, and my sincere thanks go to Katherine Blanchard, Chrisso Boulis, and Alessandro Pezzati for all of their assistance. I am also appreciative to Ann Kuttner and Holly Pittman for orchestrating my research trip. Adam Aja and Joseph Greene provided me with information concerning the figurines in the Semitic Museum, Harvard University. McGuire Gibson and Helen McDonald supplied me with information about funerary contexts, as well as terracotta figurines, from the University of Chicago excavations at Nippur. Jerry Langin-Hooper edited several of the images published in this article. For all of their help, I am grateful. Any errors remain, of course, my own.

References

Assante, J. 2000. The Erotic Reliefs of Ancient Mesopotamia. Ph.D. diss., Columbia University, New York.Google Scholar
Bahrani, Z. 2001. Women of Babylon: Gender and Representation in Mesopotamia. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bailey, D. 2005. Prehistoric Figurines: Representation and Corporeality in the Neolithic. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baughan, E. 2013. Couched in Death: Klinai and Identity in Anatolia and Beyond. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
de Beauchamp, A. 1790. “Mémoire sur les Antiquités babyloniennes qui se trouvent aux environs de Bagdad.” Journal des Scavans: Dec. 1790.Google Scholar
Berlin, A. 2013. “The Alexander Effect in the Early Hellenistic East,” conference paper given at the American Schools of Oriental Research Annual Meeting; November 22, 2013.Google Scholar
Daly, L., Moreau, K., Ruwell, M.E., and Fredricks, M.. 1982. “Guide to the Nippur Excavation Records, 1888–1900, University of Pennsylvania Museum Archives.” Unpublished archive guide. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Downey, S. 1988. Mesopotamian Religious Architecture: Alexander through the Parthians. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Geere, H.V. 1904. By Nile and Euphrates: A Record of Discovery and Adventure. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark.Google Scholar
Gibson, McG. 1975. Excavations at Nippur: Eleventh Season. Chicago: The Oriental Institute.Google Scholar
Gosden, C. 2004. Archaeology and Colonialism: Cultural Contact from 5000 BC to the Present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hannestad, L. 1983. The Hellenistic Pottery from Failaka, With a Survey of Hellenistic Pottery in the Near East, Volume 2/1 (Jutland Archaeological Society Publications, XVI:2). Aarhus: Jysk Arkæologisk Selskab.Google Scholar
Hilprecht, H.V. 1908. The So-Called Peters-Hilprecht Controversy. Philadelphia: A.J. Holman and Company.Google Scholar
Higgins, R. 1967. Greek Terracottas. London: Methuen & Co. Ltd. Google Scholar
Hopkins, C. 1972. Topography and Architecture of Seleucia on the Tigris. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Invernizzi, A. 1970–71. “Problemi di Coroplastica Tardo-Mesopotamica.” Mesopotamia 5/6: 325–89.Google Scholar
Invernizzi, A. 1985. “Seleucia on the Tigris: Terracotta Figurines.” Pp. 97–99 in Invernizzi, A., Mancini, M., and Valtz, E. (eds.), The Land Between Two Rivers: twenty years of Italian archaeology in the Middle East: the treasures of Mesopotamia. Turin: Il Quadrante.Google Scholar
Karvonen-Kannas, K. 1995. The Seleucid and Parthian Terracotta Figurines from Babylon. Firenze: Case Editrice Le Lettere.Google Scholar
Keall, E. 1970. The Significance of Late Parthian Nippur. Ph.D. diss., University of Michigan Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Keall, E. and Ciuk, K.. 1991. “Continuity of Tradition in the Pottery from Parthian Nippur.” Pp. 57–70 in Schippmann, K., Herling, A., and Salles, J.-F. (eds.), Golf-Archäologie: Mesopotamien, Iran, Kuwait, Bahrain, Vereinigte Arabische Emirate und Oman. Buch am Erlbach: Verlag Marie L. Leidorf.Google Scholar
Kilmer, M. 1993. Greek Erotica on Attic Red-Figure Vases. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Klengel-Brandt, E. 1979–1981. “Some remarks on the terracotta figurines from Babylon.” Sumer 41/1–2: 118–20.Google Scholar
Klengel-Brandt, E. and Cholidis, N.. 2006. Die Terrakotten von Babylon im Vorderasiatischen Museum in Berlin, Teil 1: Die Anthropomorphen Figuren. Saarwellingen: Saarländische Druckerei & Verlag.Google Scholar
Koldewey, R. 1925. Das wieder erstehende Babylon; die bisherigen Ergebnisse der deutschen Ausgrabungen. Leipzig: J.C Hinrichs.Google Scholar
Kucklick, B. 1996. Puritans in Babylon: The Ancient Near East and American Intellectual Life, 1880–1930. Princeton: Princeton University.Google Scholar
Langin-Hooper, S. 2007. “Social Networks and Cross-Cultural Interaction: A New Interpretation of the Female Terracotta Figurines of Hellenistic Babylon.” Oxford Journal of Archaeology 26:2: 145–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langin-Hooper, S. 2013. “Terracotta Figurines and Social Identities in Hellenistic Babylonia.” Pp. 451–79 in Feldman, M. and Brown, B. (eds.), Critical Approaches to Ancient Near Eastern Art. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langin-Hooper, S. 2015. “Fascination with the Tiny: Social Negotiation through Miniatures in Hellenistic Babylonia.” World Archaeology 47/1: 60–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langin-Hooper, S. Forthcoming. “Gender Experiments in Hellenistic Babylonian Figurines.” In Svärd, S. and Ventura, A. Garcia (eds.), Gender, Methodology and the Ancient Near East. Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns.Google Scholar
Legrain, L. 1928. “Small Sculptures from Babylonian Tombs.” The Museum Journal of the University of Pennsylvania 19/2: 195–212.Google Scholar
Legrain, L. 1930. Terra-cottas from Nippur (University of Pennsylvania, The University Museum, Publications of the Babylonian Section, Vol. XVI). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Lissarrague, F. 1990. The Aesthetics of the Greek Banquet: Images of Wine and Ritual, translated by A. Szegedy-Maszak. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maderia, P. 1964. Men in Search of Man: The First Seventy-Five Years of the University Museum of the University of Pennsylvania. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meade, C.W. 1974. Road to Babylon: Development of U.S. Assyriology. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menegazzi, R. 2007. “La Coroplastica della Mesopotamia Ellenizzata.” Pp. 129–33 in Sulla Via Di Alessandro da Seleucia al Gandhara. Milan: Silvana Editoriale.Google Scholar
Menegazzi, R. 2012. “Creating a new language: The terracotta figurines from Seleucia on the Tigris.” Pp. 157–67 in Matthews, R. and Curtis, J. (eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Congress on the Archaeology of the Ancient Near East 12 April – 16 April 2010, the British Museum and UCL, London, Volume 1: Mega-cities & Mega-sites; The Archaeology of Consumption & Disposal; Landscape, Transport & Communication. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.Google Scholar
Menegazzi, R. 2014. Seleucia al Tigri Le Terrecotte Figurate: Dagli Scavi Italiani e Americani (Monografie di Mesopotamia XVI). Firenze: Casa Editrice Le Lettere.Google Scholar
Muscarella, O.W. 1977. “Unexcavated Objects and Ancient Near Eastern Art.” Pp 153–208 in Levine, L. and Young, T.C. Jr. (eds.), Mountains and Lowlands: Essays in the Archaeology of Greater Mesopotamia (Bibliotheca Mesopotamica, Volume 7). Malibu: Undena Publications.Google Scholar
Muscarella, O.W. 2000. The Lie Became Great: The Forgery of Ancient Near Eastern Cultures. Groningen: Styx Publications.Google Scholar
Neils, J. 2000. “Others Within the Other: An Intimate Look at Hetairai and Maenads.” Pp. 203–26 in Cohen, B. (ed.), Not the Classical Ideal: Athens and the Construction of the Other in Greek Art. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Passmore, E. 2014. “Analytical Results for Pigment Traces on Selected Seleucid Terracotta and Plaster Figurines from the Kelsey Museum.” Pp. 19–21 in Menegazzi, R., Seleucia al Tigri Le Terrecotte Figurate: Dagli Scavi Italiani e Americani. Firenze: Le Lettere.Google Scholar
Peirce, S. 1998. “Visual Language and Concepts of Cult on the ‘Lenaia Vases’.” Classical Antiquity 17/1: 59–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, J.P. 1897. Nippur or Explorations and Adventures on the Euphrates, Volume 2, New York: G.P. Putnam's Sons.Google Scholar
Peters, J.P. 1899. Nippur or Explorations and Adventures on the Euphrates, Volume 1, New York: G.P. Putnam's Sons.Google Scholar
Petrie, C. 2002. “Seleucid Uruk: An Analysis of Ceramic Distribution.” Iraq 64: 85–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potts, D. 1997. Mesopotamian Civilization: The Material Foundations. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Rabinowitz, N.S. 2002. “Excavating Women's Homoeroticism in Ancient Greece: The Evidence from Attic Vase Painting.” Pp. 106–66 in Rabinowitz, N.S. and Auanger, L. (eds.), Among Women: From the Homosocial to the Homoerotic in the Ancient World. Austin: University of Texas Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reade, J.E. 2008. “Tablets at Babylon and the British Museum.” Pp. 74–80 in Finkel, I.L. and Seymour, M.J. (eds.), Babylon. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ristvet, L. 2014. “Between ritual and theatre: political performance in Seleucid Babylonia.” World Archaeology 45/4: 256–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rumscheid, F. 2006. Die figürlichen Terrakotten von Priene: Fundkontexte, Ikonographie und Funktion in Wohnhäusern und Heiligtümern im Licht antiker Parallelbefunde, Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
Shapin, S., and Schaffer, S.. 1995. Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life. Princeton: Princeton University.Google Scholar
Stillwell, A. 1952. Corinth: Results of Excavations conducted by The American School of Classical Studies at Athens, Volume XV, Part II: The Potters’ Quarter, The Terracottas. Princeton: The American School of Classical Studies at Athens.Google Scholar
Thönges-Stringaris, R. 1965. “Das Griechische Totenmahl.” Mitteilungen des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts, Athenische Abteilung 80: 1–68.Google Scholar
Topper, K. 2012. The Imagery of the Athenian Symposium. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Valtz, E. 1991. “Pottery from Seleucia.” Pp. 45–56 in Schippmann, K., Herling, A., and Salles, J.-F. (eds.), Golf-Archäologie: Mesopotamien, Iran, Kuwait, Bahrain, Vereinigte Arabische Emirate und Oman. Buch am Erlbach: Verlag Marie L. Leidorf.Google Scholar
Van Buren, E.D. 1930. Clay Figurines of Babylonia and Assyria. New Haven: Yale University.Google Scholar
Van Dommelen, P. 1997. “Colonial Constructs: Colonialism and Archaeology in the Mediterranean.” World Archaeology 28/3: 305–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Ingen, W. 1939. Figurines from Seleucia on the Tigris: Discovered by the Expeditions Conducted by the University of Michigan with the Cooperation of the Toledo Museum of Art and the Cleveland Museum of Art 1927–1932. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Warden, P.G. 1997. The Hilprecht Collection of Greek, Italic, and Roman Bronzes in the University of Pennsylvania Museum. Philadelphia: The University Museum.Google Scholar
Westenholz, A. 1992. “The Early Excavators of Nippur.” Pp. 291–95 in Ellis, M. (ed.), Nippur at the Centennial: Papers Read at the 35th Rencontre Assyriologique Internationale, Philadelphia, 1988. Philadelphia: The University Museum.Google Scholar
Westh-Hansen, S. 2011. “Cultural Interaction and the Emergence of Hybrids in the Material Culture of Hellenistic Mesopotamia: An Interpretation of Terracotta Figurines, Ceramic Ware and Seal Impressions.” Pp. 103–16 in Kouremenos, A., Chandrasekaran, S. and Rossi, R. (eds.), From Pella to Gandhara: Hybridisation and Identity in the Art and Architecture of the Hellenistic East (British Archaeological Reports International Series 2221). Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar
Wild, G. 1973. Seleucid and Parthian Figurines: Contribution to a Study of the Typology of Mesopotamian Terra Cotta Figurines. MA diss., American University of Beirut, Lebanon.Google Scholar
Wilson, K.L. 2012. Bismaya: Recovering the Lost City of Adab. Chicago: Oriental Institute Publications.Google Scholar
Zettler, R. 1992. “Excavations at Nippur, The University of Pennsylvania, and the University's Museum.” Pp. 325–36 in Ellis, M. (ed.), Nippur at the Centennial: Papers Read at the 35th Rencontre Assyriologique Internationale, Philadelphia, 1988. Philadelphia: The University Museum.Google Scholar
Ziegler, C. 1962. Die Terrakotten von Warka (Ausgrabungen der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft in Uruk-Warka Band 6). Berlin: Verlag Gebr. Mann. Google Scholar