Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T11:40:58.612Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The United Irishmen and social reform

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2016

James Quinn*
Affiliation:
Dictionary of Irish Biography, Royal Irish Academy

Extract

When questioned by a parliamentary committee after the rebellion of 1798, the United Irish leader Thomas Addis Emmet predicted that ‘if a revolution ever takes place, a very different system of political economy will be established from what has hitherto prevailed here’. Was there any real substance to this claim? Did Emmet’s words indicate that the republican leadership genuinely sought a radical reshaping of society, or was he simply indulging in empty rhetoric that a broken United Irish movement could never make good?

It has always been difficult to pin down the United Irishmen’s socio-economic views: their pronouncements in this area were few and were generally couched in vague terms. This is hardly surprising. Given that the society’s membership was far from socially homogeneous, the leadership no doubt recognised the difficulties involved in trying to produce an agreed programme of social reform. In an organisation one of whose earliest rules had been ‘to attend to those things in which we agree, to exclude from our thoughts those in which we differ’, it was generally judged prudent to steer clear of such a potentially divisive subject. Moreover, the readiness with which the government instigated prosecutions of outspoken radicals, particularly after the outbreak of war in 1793, made advisable a degree of caution in any statements which could be construed as threatening the established social order. Nevertheless, the society did address the issue of social reform from time to time, and individual United Irishmen also espoused a variety of proposals. This article will attempt to examine some of the strands of United Irish social thinking and to determine if the movement had such a thing as a coherent programme of social reform.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Irish Historical Studies Publications Ltd 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Memoire of the Irish union (London, 1802), pp 35-6Google Scholar.

2 ’Resolution of the Society of United Irishmen of Dublin’, 30 Dec. 1791(Society of United Irishmen (Dublin, 1794), p. 8)Google Scholar.

3 Connolly, James, Labour in Irish history (Dublin, 1914), pp 89, 95Google Scholar; Ellis, P.Berresford, A history of the Irish working class (London, 1972), pp 71-4Google Scholar; Cronin, Seán and Roche, Richard (eds), Freedom the Wolfe Tone way (Tralee, 1973), p. 73 Google Scholar.

4 Clarkson, J. D., Labour and nationalism in Ireland (New York, 1925), p. 127 Google Scholar.

5 McDowell, R. B., Irish public opinion, 1750–1800 (London, 1944), pp 200, 202Google Scholar.

6 McDowell, R. B., ‘The proceedings of the Dublin Society of United Irishmen’ in Anal. Hib., no. 17 (1949), pp 3143 Google Scholar.

7 The Society of United Irishmen of Dublin to the Volunteers of Ireland’, 14 Dec. 1792 (Society of United Irishmen, p. 45)Google Scholar.

8 McDowell, R. B., Ireland in the age of imperialism and revolution, 1760–1801 (Oxford, 1979), p. 374 Google Scholar; Northern Star, 23, 30 June 1792.

9 ’Memoir of James Hope’ in Madden, R.R., Antrim and Down in ’98 (Glasgow, 1888), p. 108 Google Scholar.

10 Elliott, Marianne, Wolfe Tone: prophet of Irish independence (New Haven, 1989), p. 418 Google Scholar; eadem, , Partners in revolution: the United Irishmen and France (New Haven & London, 1982), p. 367 Google Scholar; Curtin, Nancy J., The United Irishmen: popular politics in Ulster and Dublin, 1791–1798 (Oxford, 1994), p. 283 Google Scholar.

11 Smyth, Jim, The men of no property: Irish radicals and popular politics in the late eighteenth century (Dublin, 1992), p. 165 Google Scholar.

12 ’The Society of United Irishmen of Dublin to the Hon. Simon Butler and Oliver Bond’, 16 Aug. 1793 (Society of United Irishmen, p. 103)Google Scholar.

13 Resolution of the Society of United Irishmen of Dublin’, 30 Dec. 1791 (ibid., p. 9).

14 ’The Society of United Irishmen of Dublin to the Irish nation’, 25 Jan. 1793 (ibid., pp 55–6).

15 ’The Society of United Irishmen of Dublin tę the people of Ireland’, 14 Mar. 1794 (ibid., p. 193).

16 The autobiography of Theobald Wolfe Tone, 1763–98, ed. O’Brien, R.Barry (2 vols, Dublin, 1913 ed.), i, 38Google Scholar.

17 ‘Declaration of the Society of United Irishmen of Dublin’, 9 Nov. 1791 (Society of United Irishmen, p. 5)Google Scholar.

18 Northern Star, 17 Mar., 8 Dec. 1792; see also address ‘To the Presbyterians of the province of Ulster’, c. Sept. 1792 (N.A.I., Rebellion papers, 620/19/101).

19 The Society of United Irishmen of Dublin to the people of Ireland’, 14 Mar. 1794 (Society of United Irishmen, p. 192).

20 ’The Society of United Irishmen to the people of Ireland’, c. Mar. 1794 (ibid., pp 129–30). According to William Drennan, this was written by Thomas Addis Emmet ( The Drennan letters... 1776–1819, ed. Chart, D.A. (Belfast, 1931), p. 184 Google Scholar).

21 Memoire of the Irish union, p. 35.

22 Ibid., p.94.

23 McDowell, R. B., ‘The personnel of the Dublin Society of United Irishmen, 1791–4’ in I.H.S., ii, no. 5 (Mar. 1940), pp 18, 50Google Scholar; idem, Ireland in the age of imperialism and revolution, pp 364–6.

24 Lecky, W. E. H., A history of Ireland in the eighteenth century (5 vols, London, 1892), iii, 1819 Google Scholar.

25 Smyth, Men of no property, p. 95.

26 MacNeven, W. J., Pieces of Irish history (New York, 1807), pp 76-7Google Scholar.

27 Whelan, Kevin, ‘The United Irishmen, the Enlightenment and popular culture’ in Dickson, David, Keogh, Dáire and Whelan, Kevin (eds), The United Irishmen: republicanism, radicalism and rebellion (Dublin, 1993), p. 285 Google Scholar.

28 A candid and impartial account of the disturbances in the county of Meath in the years 1792, 1793, 1794, by a County Meath freeholder (Dublin, 1794), p. 8 Google Scholar.

29 See, for example, Hobart to Nepean, 17 June 1793 (P.R.O., HO 100/44/147-50); Camden to Portland, 25 July 1795 (N.A.I., Rebellion papers, 620/22/19, pp 12–13).

30 Irvine Johnston to Thomas Pelham, 5 Mar. 1797 (N.A.I., Rebellion papers, 620/29/23).

31 John Knox to Thomas Pelham, 17 Dec. 1796 (B.L., Pelham papers, Add. MS 33104, f. 1139).

32 John Toler to_____, Apr. 1797 (N.A.I., Rebellion papers, 620/29/336).

33 Advice to the rich... by an independent country gentleman (Belfast, 1796), pp5,24Google Scholar.

34 Arthur O’Connor to the secret committee of the House of Commons, 16 Aug. 1798 (Memoire of the Irish union, pp 58–9).

35 Memoire of the Irish union, pp 29, 35–6,70-72,92.

36 Madden, Antrim and Down in ’98, pp 151–2.

37 Ibid., p. 108.

38 Notes by Hope on the insurrection of 1803 (T.C.D., Hope MS 7253/1, f. 3).

39 Connolly, Labour in Irish history, pp 99, 103.

40 Notes by Hope on the insurrection of 1803 (T.C.D., Hope MS 7253/1, f. 3).

41 ’The provisional government to the people of Ireland’, July 1803 (N.A.I., Rebellion papers, 620/11/134).

42 Madden, Antrim and Down in ’98, p. 108.

43 Smyth, Men of no property, p. 165.

44 Russell, Thomas, A letter to the people of Ireland on the present situation of the country (Belfast, 1796)Google Scholar.

45 Draft essay by Russell, c. 1797–8 (T.C.D., Sirr MS 868/1, f. 323).

46 Madden, R. R., The United Irishmen, their lives and times, 3rd series (3 vols, Dublin, 1846), ii, 151 Google Scholar.

47 Northern Star, 14 Nov. 1793; for authorship see Russell’s journal, 14 Nov. 1793 ( Journals and memoirs of Thomas Russell, 1791–5, ed. Woods, C.J. (Dublin, 1991), p. 135 Google Scholar).

48 Russell, Journals, p. 83 (9 July 1793).

49 Ibid., p.88(ll July 1793).

50 Russell to Leonard McNally, 6 Oct. 1803 (P.R.O., HO 100/114/121-2).

51 Russell’s statement, 17 Oct. 1803 ( MacDonagh, Michael (ed.), The viceroy’s postbag (London, 1904), p. 425 Google Scholar).

52 Sir George Hill to Thomas Pelham, 20 Mar. 1797 (N.A.I., Rebellion papers, 620/29/96).

53 Dickson, David, ‘Paine and Ireland’ in Dickson, , Keogh, & Whelan, (eds), United irishmen, p. 147 Google Scholar; The Press, 4 Nov. 1797.

54 O’Connor, Arthur, The state of Ireland (London, 1798), pp 3031 Google Scholar,57.

55 Cork Gazette, 13, 24 Feb. 1796.

56 Ibid., 17 Dec. 1796 (enclosed in N.A.I., Rebellion papers, 620/26/141).

57 John Ford to John Lees, 27 Apr. 1795 (Centre for Kentish Studies, Maidstone, Camden papers, U840/0144/20/1).

58 Hugh White to C. S. Stephenson, 13 Feb. 1797 (N.A.I., Rebellion papers, 620/28/276).

59 Union Star, c. 1797 (ibid., 620/54/51).

60 The union doctrine or poor man’s catechism [1796?], pp 3–5,7-8 (ibid., 620/43/6).

61 Rev. A.B., Christ in triumph coming to judgement! As recorded in the most holy sacred scripture by the holy prophets and evangelists (Strabane, n.d.), enclosed in A. Cole Hamilton to [Dublin Castle?], 2 Mar. 1797 (ibid., 620/29/8).

62 John Beresford to Lord Auckland, 4 Sept. 1796 ( The correspondence of the Rt Hon. John Beresford, ed. Beresford, William (2 vols, London, 1854), ii, 128 Google Scholar); McSkimin, Samuel, Annals of Ulster, 1790–1798, ed. McCrum, E.J. (Belfast, 1906), pp 31-2Google Scholar; see also Miller, David, ‘Presbyterianism and “modernisation” in Ulster’ in Philpin, C. H. E. (ed.), Nationalism and popular protest in Ireland (Cambridge, 1987), pp 80109 Google Scholar.

63 James Buchanan to [Dublin Castle?], 14 Sept. 1796 (N.A.I., Rebellion papers, 620/25/62).

64 William Bristow to [Dublin Castle?], 31 Mar. 1796 (ibid., 620/23/58).

65 Moody, T. W., ‘The political ideas of the United Irishmen’ in Ireland Today, iii, 1 (1938), p. 23 Google Scholar.

66 The union doctrine or poor man’s catechism, pp 5, 6.

67 MacDonagh, Oliver, States of mind: a study of Anglo-Irish conflict, 1780–1980 (London, 1983), p. 75 Google Scholar; Elliott, Partners in revolution, p. 369.