Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T02:07:27.523Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

New long-stay patients — two years later

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2014

David Meagher
Affiliation:
St Vincent's Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, Ireland
Liam Watters
Affiliation:
Dept of Psychiatry, Fulbarn Hospital, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 5RB, England

Abstract

Objectives: The aims of this study were to review the outcome of those long-stay patients two years after identification and to compare those discharged with those remaining in hospital in order to identify factors which might contribute to their continuing stay.

Methods: All the new long-stay patients who were more than one year and less than six years on 1st March 1992 were included in the study. Their current placement. Legal status and demographic and clinical details were recorded. Findings: Sixtynine percent of the original cohort remained in hospital, 9% had died, and 22 % had been discharged, mainly to highly staffed accommodation. Approximately half of those remaining in hospital were considered suitable for community placement. Those remaining in hospital were older, had longer durations of illness and were more likely to be dangerous than those discharged.

Conclusions: Despite continuing developments in community services a considerable number of new long-stay patients still remain in hospital and the proportion of those compulsorily detained remains unchanged.

Type
Audit
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Magnus, RV. ‘The new chronics”. Br J Psychiatry 1967; 113: 555–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Wing, JK. Long term community care: experience in a London borough Psychol Med 1982: Monograph Supplement 2.Google Scholar
3.Lelliot, P, Wing, J. A national audit of new long-stay psychiatric patients. II: Impact on services. Br J Psychiatry 1994; 165: 170–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Walsh, D, Butler, S, Sarks, S. The St Loman's psychiatric service: an exercise in parsimony. Ir J Psychiatry 1990; xx: 511.Google Scholar
5.Mann, SA, Cree, W. ‘New’ long-stay psychiatric patients; a national sample survey of 15 mental hospitals in England and Wales 1972/73. Psychol Med 1976; 6: 603–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Lelliott, P, Wing, J, Clifford, P. A national audit of new long-stay psychiatric patients 1: methods and description of the cohort. Br J Psychiatry 1994; 165: 160–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Clifford, P, Charman, A, Webb, Y, Best, S. Planning for community care. Long-stay populations of hospitals scheduled for run-down or closure. Br J Psychiatry 1991; 158: 190–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.McCreadie, RG, Wilson, O, Burton, LL. The Scottish survey of ‘new chronic’ inpatients. Br J Psychiatry 1983; 143: 564–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Gannon, MA, Meagher, D, Johnson, J, Mirza, H, Farren, C. A survey of new long-stay patients in an Irish health board area. Psychiatric Services 1995; 46(4): 394–8.Google Scholar
10.Clifford, P. The Community Placement Questionnaire. London: Research and Development for Psychiatry. TR House, 134138 Borough High Street, London SE1 1LB.Google Scholar
11.Mc Creadie, RG, Robinson, ADT, Wilson, OA. The Scottish survey of new chronic inpatients: Two year follow up. Br J Psychiatry 1985; 147: 637–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Keogh, F, Walsh, D. A national audit of new long-stay patients. Ir J Psychiatry 1994; 11: 712.Google Scholar
13.Carey, TG, Owens, JM, Home, P. An analysis of a new long-stay population: the need for mental hospitals. Ir Journal of Psychol Med 1993; 10(2): 80–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Conning, AM, Brownlow, J. Determining suitability of placement for long-stay psychiatric inpatients. Hosp and Comm Psychiatr 1992; 43(7): 709–12.Google ScholarPubMed