Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T07:07:41.201Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Empirical investigation into placebo effectiveness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2014

Barbara Dolinska
Barbara Dolinska*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Wroclaw, ul. Dawida 1, Wroclaw, Poland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate whether placebo effects may vary in strength, depending on appearance of the medication.

Method: Polish subjects were randomly given different kinds of pills and told that the medicine was produced abroad or in Poland and that it was cheap or very expensive. Measures of different forms of well-being were taken directly after the ‘therapy’.

Results: Subjective ratings were higher for subjects who received big white or small red medicine compared to subjects who received small white or big red pills. The results are discussed in the light of the subject's previous experience with drugs of different kinds.

Conclusion: It was shown that placebo effects do vary in strength, depending on the appearance of the pill.

Keywords

Placebo effectivenessDrug therapyPolandPolish subjects
Type
Brief Reports
Information
Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine , Volume 16 , Issue 2 , June 1999 , pp. 57 - 58
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Shapiro, AK. Placebo effects in psychotherapy and psychoanalysis. J Clinical Pharmacol 1970; 10: 73–8.Google ScholarPubMed
2.Lundth, LG. Placebo: belief and health. A cognitive-emotional model. Scand J Psychol 1987; 28: 128–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Beecher, HK. Quantification of the subjective pain experience. In: Weisenberg, M ed. Pain: clinical and experimental perspectives. Saint Louis: The Mosby Company, 1975: 56–66.Google Scholar
4.Benson, H, Epstein, MD. The placebo effect. A neglected asset in the care of patients. JAMA 1975; 232: 1225–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Critelii, JW, Neuman, KEThe placebo. Conceptual analysis of construct in transition. American Psychologist 1984; 39: 32–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Frank, JD. Persuasion and healing. A comparative study of psychotherapy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University, 1973.Google Scholar
7.Wagstaff, GEHypnosis, compliance and belief. Brighton: Harvester Press, 1981.Google Scholar
8.Haas, H, Fink, H, Hartfelder, G. Das Placeboproblem. Fortschritte der Arzneimittleforschuntt, 1959; 1: 279–454.Google Scholar
9.Evans, FJ. Expectancy, therapeutic instructions, and placebo response. In: White, L, Tursky, B, Shwartz, GE, eds. Placebo theory: research and mechanisms. New York: The Guilford Press, 1985:215–28.Google Scholar
10.Kratochvil, S. Psychoterapia, Warszawa, PWN, 1980.Google Scholar